Alternatives to Amazon Route 53 logo

Alternatives to Amazon Route 53

GoDaddy, Google Cloud DNS, CloudFlare, Google Domains, and Namecheap are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Amazon Route 53.
14.4K
678

What is Amazon Route 53 and what are its top alternatives?

Amazon Route 53 is a scalable Domain Name System (DNS) web service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It allows users to route end users to internet applications by translating domain names into IP addresses. Key features include reliability, low latency, global reach, and integration with other AWS services. However, limitations include complex pricing structure based on usage and the AWS ecosystem lock-in.

  1. Google Cloud DNS: Google Cloud DNS is a reliable, scalable, and managed DNS service provided by Google Cloud Platform. Key features include low latency, high availability, easy integration with other Google Cloud services, and competitive pricing. Pros include global reach and Google's robust infrastructure, while cons include limited support for non-Google Cloud environments.
  2. Cloudflare DNS: Cloudflare DNS is a secure and fast global DNS service offered by Cloudflare. Key features include DDoS protection, DNSSEC support, and a user-friendly dashboard. Pros include strong security features and free usage with basic functionality, while cons include occasional outages and limited customization options.
  3. AWS DNS Management: AWS DNS Management is Amazon Route 53's alternative that offers similar features for managing DNS records within the AWS ecosystem. Key features include seamless integration with other AWS services, reliability, and scalability. Pros and cons are similar to Amazon Route 53 itself.
  4. Microsoft Azure DNS: Microsoft Azure DNS is a reliable and high-performance DNS service provided by Microsoft Azure. Key features include easy setup, high availability, and integration with other Microsoft Azure services. Pros include strong security measures and competitive pricing, while cons include limited global coverage compared to other providers.
  5. DNS Made Easy: DNS Made Easy is a premium DNS hosting service known for its speed, reliability, and advanced traffic management features. Key features include global server network, DNS failover, and flexible API for automation. Pros include high performance and advanced traffic routing options, while cons include higher pricing tiers for advanced features.
  6. BlueCat DNS: BlueCat DNS is an enterprise-grade DNS management solution with features such as DDI (DNS, DHCP, IPAM) integration, automation, and security. Pros of BlueCat DNS include centralized management of network infrastructure and compliance with industry standards, while cons include higher pricing for enterprise-level features.
  7. PowerDNS: PowerDNS is an open-source DNS server software known for its flexibility, scalability, and performance. Key features include support for various backends, DNSSEC support, and REST API for automation. Pros of PowerDNS include customization options and active community support, while cons include the need for technical expertise to set up and manage.
  8. Namecheap PremiumDNS: Namecheap PremiumDNS is a cost-effective DNS hosting service with features like DNSSEC, Anycast network, and easy setup. Pros include competitive pricing and user-friendly interface, while cons include limited advanced traffic management options compared to other providers.
  9. NS1: NS1 is a modern DNS and traffic management platform offering features like intelligent routing, advanced analytics, and API-driven automation. Key features include real-time data processing, DDoS protection, and global server network. Pros of NS1 include advanced traffic routing capabilities and robust security measures, while cons include potentially higher pricing for premium features.
  10. EasyDNS: EasyDNS is a reliable DNS hosting provider known for its privacy protection, security features, and customer support. Key features include DNS failover, DDoS protection, and domain registration services. Pros include focus on privacy and security, while cons include potential limitations in customization options for advanced users.

Top Alternatives to Amazon Route 53

  • GoDaddy
    GoDaddy

    Go Daddy makes registering Domain Names fast, simple, and affordable. It is a trusted domain registrar that empowers people with creative ideas to succeed online. ...

  • Google Cloud DNS
    Google Cloud DNS

    Use Google's infrastructure for production quality, high volume DNS serving. Your users will have reliable, low-latency access to Google's infrastructure from anywhere in the world using our network of Anycast name servers. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Google Domains
    Google Domains

    It is a domain registration service which includes top website builders. The privacy is included at no additional cost. It also includes simple domain management tools. ...

  • Namecheap
    Namecheap

    We provide a set of DNS servers spread across the US and Europe to deliver highly reliable DNS services to everyone. By choosing Namecheap.com as your domain registrar, you are choosing a highly reputable and reliable partner. Namecheap.com is rated 4.6 out of 5 - Based on 1,395 reviews via Google Checkout ...

  • Amazon S3
    Amazon S3

    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

Amazon Route 53 alternatives & related posts

GoDaddy logo

GoDaddy

552
495
11
Your all in one solution to grow online
552
495
+ 1
11
PROS OF GODADDY
  • 8
    Flexible payment methods for domains
  • 3
    .io support
CONS OF GODADDY
  • 2
    Constantly trying to upsell you
  • 1
    Not a great UI

related GoDaddy posts

Deep Shah
Software Engineer at Amazon · | 6 upvotes · 962.1K views

I only know Java and so thinking of building a web application in the following order. I need some help on what alternatives I can choose. Open to replace components, services, or infrastructure.

  • Frontend: AngularJS, Bootstrap
  • Web Framework: Spring Boot
  • Database: Amazon DynamoDB
  • Authentication: Auth0
  • Deployment: Amazon EC2 Container Service
  • Local Testing: Docker
  • Marketing: Mailchimp (Separately Export from Auth0)
  • Website Domain: GoDaddy
  • Routing: Amazon Route 53

PS: Open to exploring options of going completely native ( AWS Lambda, AWS Security but have to learn all)

See more
Google Cloud DNS logo

Google Cloud DNS

2.4K
572
44
Reliable, resilient, low-latency DNS serving from Google’s worldwide network of Anycast DNS servers
2.4K
572
+ 1
44
PROS OF GOOGLE CLOUD DNS
  • 9
    Backed by Google
  • 7
    High-availability
  • 6
    Reliable
  • 5
    High volume
  • 5
    Anycast DNS servers
  • 4
    Low-latency
  • 4
    High-Performance
  • 4
    Inexpensive
CONS OF GOOGLE CLOUD DNS
  • 4
    Lack of privacy
  • 2
    Backed by Google

related Google Cloud DNS posts

CloudFlare logo

CloudFlare

76.5K
22.5K
1.8K
The Web Performance & Security Company.
76.5K
22.5K
+ 1
1.8K
PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 424
    Easy setup, great cdn
  • 277
    Free ssl
  • 199
    Easy setup
  • 190
    Security
  • 180
    Ssl
  • 98
    Great cdn
  • 77
    Optimizer
  • 71
    Simple
  • 44
    Great UI
  • 28
    Great js cdn
  • 12
    Apps
  • 12
    HTTP/2 Support
  • 12
    DNS Analytics
  • 12
    AutoMinify
  • 9
    Rocket Loader
  • 9
    Ipv6
  • 9
    Easy
  • 8
    IPv6 "One Click"
  • 8
    Fantastic CDN service
  • 7
    DNSSEC
  • 7
    Nice DNS
  • 7
    SSHFP
  • 7
    Free GeoIP
  • 7
    Amazing performance
  • 7
    API
  • 7
    Cheapest SSL
  • 6
    SPDY
  • 6
    Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
  • 5
    Ubuntu
  • 5
    Asynchronous resource loading
  • 4
    Global Load Balancing
  • 4
    Performance
  • 4
    Easy Use
  • 3
    CDN
  • 2
    Registrar
  • 2
    Support for SSHFP records
  • 1
    Web3
  • 1
    Прохси
  • 1
    HTTPS3/Quic
CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 2
    No support for SSHFP records
  • 2
    Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

related CloudFlare posts

Tom Klein

Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

See more
Johnny Bell

When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

See more
Google Domains logo

Google Domains

222
220
3
A domain registration service
222
220
+ 1
3
PROS OF GOOGLE DOMAINS
  • 2
    Minimalist Design
  • 1
    Great support
CONS OF GOOGLE DOMAINS
  • 1
    It takes long time for DNS propagation

related Google Domains posts

which is BETTER? I get unlimited sites effectively (minus the fees for domains themselves)... I am a google-phile, but I also want my current site to maintain google email....not pay 7.20/usr/mo extra. DreamHost is relatively expensive after about a year or two. i dont know enough yet about Google Domains and what it comes with. Dreamhost gives you direct SQL access, unlimited emails, WordPress sites, etc.

See more
Namecheap logo

Namecheap

2.6K
596
50
Cheap Domain Names Registration
2.6K
596
+ 1
50
PROS OF NAMECHEAP
  • 20
    Cheap
  • 9
    Free privacy protection
  • 6
    Awesome customer support
  • 5
    Free email forwarding
  • 4
    Free custom DNS
  • 2
    Web Hosting/CPanel
  • 2
    24/7 Customer Support
  • 2
    Premium DNS
CONS OF NAMECHEAP
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Namecheap posts

    Amazon S3 logo

    Amazon S3

    53.1K
    39.7K
    2K
    Store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
    53.1K
    39.7K
    + 1
    2K
    PROS OF AMAZON S3
    • 590
      Reliable
    • 492
      Scalable
    • 456
      Cheap
    • 329
      Simple & easy
    • 83
      Many sdks
    • 30
      Logical
    • 13
      Easy Setup
    • 11
      REST API
    • 11
      1000+ POPs
    • 6
      Secure
    • 4
      Easy
    • 4
      Plug and play
    • 3
      Web UI for uploading files
    • 2
      Faster on response
    • 2
      Flexible
    • 2
      GDPR ready
    • 1
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Plug-gable
    • 1
      Easy integration with CloudFront
    CONS OF AMAZON S3
    • 7
      Permissions take some time to get right
    • 6
      Requires a credit card
    • 6
      Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
    • 3
      Complex to set up

    related Amazon S3 posts

    Ashish Singh
    Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest · | 38 upvotes · 3.3M views

    To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

    Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

    We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

    Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

    Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

    #BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

    See more
    Russel Werner
    Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.8M views

    StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

    Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

    #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

    See more
    Akamai logo

    Akamai

    1.9K
    439
    0
    The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
    1.9K
    439
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF AKAMAI
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF AKAMAI
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Akamai posts

        Postman logo

        Postman

        94.3K
        80.8K
        1.8K
        Only complete API development environment
        94.3K
        80.8K
        + 1
        1.8K
        PROS OF POSTMAN
        • 490
          Easy to use
        • 369
          Great tool
        • 276
          Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
        • 156
          Easy setup, looks good
        • 144
          The best api workflow out there
        • 53
          It's the best
        • 53
          History feature
        • 44
          Adds real value to my workflow
        • 43
          Great interface that magically predicts your needs
        • 35
          The best in class app
        • 12
          Can save and share script
        • 10
          Fully featured without looking cluttered
        • 8
          Collections
        • 8
          Option to run scrips
        • 8
          Global/Environment Variables
        • 7
          Shareable Collections
        • 7
          Dead simple and useful. Excellent
        • 7
          Dark theme easy on the eyes
        • 6
          Awesome customer support
        • 6
          Great integration with newman
        • 5
          Documentation
        • 5
          Simple
        • 5
          The test script is useful
        • 4
          Saves responses
        • 4
          This has simplified my testing significantly
        • 4
          Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
        • 4
          Easy as pie
        • 3
          API-network
        • 3
          I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
        • 3
          Mocking API calls with predefined response
        • 2
          Now supports GraphQL
        • 2
          Postman Runner CI Integration
        • 2
          Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
        • 2
          Continuous integration using newman
        • 2
          Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
        • 2
          Runner
        • 2
          Graph
        • 1
          <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
        CONS OF POSTMAN
        • 10
          Stores credentials in HTTP
        • 9
          Bloated features and UI
        • 8
          Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
        • 7
          Poor GraphQL support
        • 5
          Expensive
        • 3
          Not free after 5 users
        • 3
          Can't prompt for per-request variables
        • 1
          Import swagger
        • 1
          Support websocket
        • 1
          Import curl

        related Postman posts

        Noah Zoschke
        Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 2.9M views

        We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

        Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

        Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

        This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

        Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

        Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

        Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

        See more
        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5M views

        Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

        • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
        • npm as package manager
        • NestJS as Node.js framework
        • TypeScript as programming language
        • ExpressJS as web server
        • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
        • Postman as a tool for API development
        • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
        • JSON Web Token for access token management

        The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

        • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
        • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
        • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
        • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
        See more