Alternatives to BlazeMeter logo

Alternatives to BlazeMeter

Flood IO, Gatling, Load Impact, Runscope, and RedLine13 are the most popular alternatives and competitors to BlazeMeter.
67
155
+ 1
13

What is BlazeMeter and what are its top alternatives?

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>
BlazeMeter is a tool in the Load and Performance Testing category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to BlazeMeter

  • Flood IO
    Flood IO

    Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk. ...

  • Gatling
    Gatling

    Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support. ...

  • Load Impact
    Load Impact

    It is performance testing platform brings performance testing to the developer’s turf. Developers of all skill levels are able to easily pick up manual testing with it and simply transition to the more modern principles of DevOps and performance testing automation. ...

  • Runscope
    Runscope

    Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring. ...

  • RedLine13
    RedLine13

    It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools. ...

  • Selenium
    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • Locust
    Locust

    Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

BlazeMeter alternatives & related posts

Flood IO logo

Flood IO

20
70
5
Where scalable software starts
20
70
+ 1
5
PROS OF FLOOD IO
  • 2
    Great feature set
  • 2
    Affordable
  • 1
    Easy to use
CONS OF FLOOD IO
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Flood IO posts

    Vrashab Jian
    Shared insights
    on
    Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

    I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

    I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

    See more
    Gatling logo

    Gatling

    248
    317
    21
    Open-source load testing for DevOps and CI/CD
    248
    317
    + 1
    21
    PROS OF GATLING
    • 6
      Great detailed reports
    • 5
      Can run in cluster mode
    • 5
      Loadrunner
    • 3
      Scala based
    • 2
      Load test as code
    • 0
      Faster
    CONS OF GATLING
    • 2
      Steep Learning Curve
    • 1
      Hard to test non-supported protocols
    • 0
      Not distributed

    related Gatling posts

    Shared insights
    on
    LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

    I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

    See more
    Vrashab Jian
    Shared insights
    on
    Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

    I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

    I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

    See more
    Load Impact logo

    Load Impact

    2
    9
    0
    Performance testing platform for developers
    2
    9
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF LOAD IMPACT
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF LOAD IMPACT
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Load Impact posts

        Runscope logo

        Runscope

        132
        173
        60
        API Performance Monitoring
        132
        173
        + 1
        60
        PROS OF RUNSCOPE
        • 17
          Great features
        • 15
          Easy to use
        • 4
          Nicely priced
        • 4
          Free plan
        • 2
          No install needed - runs on cloud
        • 2
          Decent
        • 1
          Collections
        • 1
          Dead simple and useful. Excellent
        • 1
          Awesome customer support
        • 1
          Import scripts from sources including Postman
        • 1
          Shareable Collections
        • 1
          Global & Collection level variables
        • 1
          Graphical view of response times historically
        • 1
          Integrations - StatusPage, PagerDuty, HipChat, Victorop
        • 1
          Run tests from multiple locations across globe
        • 1
          Schedule test collections to auto-run at intervals
        • 1
          Auto Re-run failed scheduled tests before notifying
        • 1
          Makes developing REST APIs easy
        • 1
          History feature - call history and response history
        • 1
          Restrict access by teams
        • 1
          Fully featured without looking cluttered
        • 1
          Can save and share scripts
        CONS OF RUNSCOPE
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Runscope posts

          RedLine13 logo

          RedLine13

          14
          21
          8
          (Almost) free load and performance testing in the cloud
          14
          21
          + 1
          8
          PROS OF REDLINE13
          • 4
            Easy to scale JMeter in the cloud cheaply
          • 2
            Easy to scale JMeter in the cloud for free or almost fr
          • 1
            Can run load agents in any EC2 Region
          • 1
            Generate JMeter Report in the cloud
          CONS OF REDLINE13
            Be the first to leave a con

            related RedLine13 posts

            Selenium logo

            Selenium

            15.4K
            12.3K
            525
            Web Browser Automation
            15.4K
            12.3K
            + 1
            525
            PROS OF SELENIUM
            • 175
              Automates browsers
            • 154
              Testing
            • 101
              Essential tool for running test automation
            • 24
              Record-Playback
            • 24
              Remote Control
            • 8
              Data crawling
            • 7
              Supports end to end testing
            • 6
              Easy set up
            • 6
              Functional testing
            • 4
              The Most flexible monitoring system
            • 3
              End to End Testing
            • 3
              Easy to integrate with build tools
            • 2
              Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
            • 2
              Record and playback
            • 2
              Compatible with Python
            • 2
              Easy to scale
            • 2
              Integration Tests
            • 0
              Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
            CONS OF SELENIUM
            • 8
              Flaky tests
            • 4
              Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
            • 2
              Update browser drivers

            related Selenium posts

            Kamil Kowalski
            Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 3.9M views

            When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

            See more
            Benjamin Poon
            QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 1.9M views

            For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

            With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

            See more
            Locust logo

            Locust

            171
            315
            51
            Define user behaviour with Python code, and swarm your system with millions of simultaneous users
            171
            315
            + 1
            51
            PROS OF LOCUST
            • 15
              Hackable
            • 11
              Supports distributed
            • 7
              Open source
            • 6
              Easy to use
            • 6
              Easy to setup
            • 4
              Fast
            • 2
              Test Anything
            CONS OF LOCUST
            • 1
              Bad design

            related Locust posts

            Shared insights
            on
            LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

            I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

            See more
            Vrashab Jian
            Shared insights
            on
            Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

            I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

            I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

            See more
            JavaScript logo

            JavaScript

            350.7K
            267K
            8.1K
            Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
            350.7K
            267K
            + 1
            8.1K
            PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
            • 1.7K
              Can be used on frontend/backend
            • 1.5K
              It's everywhere
            • 1.2K
              Lots of great frameworks
            • 896
              Fast
            • 745
              Light weight
            • 425
              Flexible
            • 392
              You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
            • 286
              Non-blocking i/o
            • 236
              Ubiquitousness
            • 191
              Expressive
            • 55
              Extended functionality to web pages
            • 49
              Relatively easy language
            • 46
              Executed on the client side
            • 30
              Relatively fast to the end user
            • 25
              Pure Javascript
            • 21
              Functional programming
            • 15
              Async
            • 13
              Full-stack
            • 12
              Setup is easy
            • 12
              Its everywhere
            • 12
              Future Language of The Web
            • 11
              JavaScript is the New PHP
            • 11
              Because I love functions
            • 10
              Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
            • 9
              Expansive community
            • 9
              Everyone use it
            • 9
              Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
            • 9
              Easy
            • 8
              Easy to hire developers
            • 8
              No need to use PHP
            • 8
              For the good parts
            • 8
              Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
            • 8
              Powerful
            • 8
              Most Popular Language in the World
            • 7
              Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
            • 7
              It's fun
            • 7
              Nice
            • 7
              Versitile
            • 7
              Hard not to use
            • 7
              Its fun and fast
            • 7
              Agile, packages simple to use
            • 7
              Supports lambdas and closures
            • 7
              Love-hate relationship
            • 7
              Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
            • 7
              Evolution of C
            • 6
              1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
            • 6
              Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
            • 6
              It let's me use Babel & Typescript
            • 6
              Easy to make something
            • 6
              Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
            • 5
              Promise relationship
            • 5
              Stockholm Syndrome
            • 5
              Function expressions are useful for callbacks
            • 5
              Scope manipulation
            • 5
              Everywhere
            • 5
              Client processing
            • 5
              Clojurescript
            • 5
              What to add
            • 4
              Because it is so simple and lightweight
            • 4
              Only Programming language on browser
            • 1
              Test2
            • 1
              Easy to learn
            • 1
              Easy to understand
            • 1
              Not the best
            • 1
              Hard to learn
            • 1
              Subskill #4
            • 1
              Test
            • 0
              Hard 彤
            CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
            • 22
              A constant moving target, too much churn
            • 20
              Horribly inconsistent
            • 15
              Javascript is the New PHP
            • 9
              No ability to monitor memory utilitization
            • 8
              Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
            • 7
              Thinks strange results are better than errors
            • 6
              Can be ugly
            • 3
              No GitHub
            • 2
              Slow

            related JavaScript posts

            Zach Holman

            Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

            But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

            But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

            Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

            See more
            Conor Myhrvold
            Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 10M views

            How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

            Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

            Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

            https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

            (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

            Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

            See more