Alternatives to BlazeMeter logo

Alternatives to BlazeMeter

Flood IO, Gatling, Load Impact, Runscope, and RedLine13 are the most popular alternatives and competitors to BlazeMeter.
63
148
+ 1
13

What is BlazeMeter and what are its top alternatives?

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>
BlazeMeter is a tool in the Load and Performance Testing category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to BlazeMeter

  • Flood IO
    Flood IO

    Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk. ...

  • Gatling
    Gatling

    Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support. ...

  • Load Impact
    Load Impact

    It is performance testing platform brings performance testing to the developer’s turf. Developers of all skill levels are able to easily pick up manual testing with it and simply transition to the more modern principles of DevOps and performance testing automation. ...

  • Runscope
    Runscope

    Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring. ...

  • RedLine13
    RedLine13

    It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools. ...

  • Selenium
    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • Locust
    Locust

    Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle. ...

  • Apache JMeter
    Apache JMeter

    It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions. ...

BlazeMeter alternatives & related posts

Flood IO logo

Flood IO

19
67
5
Where scalable software starts
19
67
+ 1
5
PROS OF FLOOD IO
  • 2
    Great feature set
  • 2
    Affordable
  • 1
    Easy to use
CONS OF FLOOD IO
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Flood IO posts

    Vrashab Jian
    Shared insights
    on
    Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

    I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

    I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

    See more
    Gatling logo

    Gatling

    239
    303
    21
    Open-source load testing for DevOps and CI/CD
    239
    303
    + 1
    21
    PROS OF GATLING
    • 6
      Great detailed reports
    • 5
      Loadrunner
    • 5
      Can run in cluster mode
    • 3
      Scala based
    • 2
      Load test as code
    CONS OF GATLING
    • 2
      Steep Learning Curve
    • 1
      Hard to test non-supported protocols
    • 0
      Not distributed

    related Gatling posts

    Shared insights
    on
    LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

    I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

    See more
    Vrashab Jian
    Shared insights
    on
    Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

    I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

    I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

    See more
    Load Impact logo

    Load Impact

    2
    9
    0
    Performance testing platform for developers
    2
    9
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF LOAD IMPACT
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF LOAD IMPACT
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Load Impact posts

        Runscope logo

        Runscope

        132
        170
        60
        API Performance Monitoring
        132
        170
        + 1
        60
        PROS OF RUNSCOPE
        • 17
          Great features
        • 15
          Easy to use
        • 4
          Nicely priced
        • 4
          Free plan
        • 2
          No install needed - runs on cloud
        • 2
          Decent
        • 1
          Collections
        • 1
          Dead simple and useful. Excellent
        • 1
          Awesome customer support
        • 1
          Import scripts from sources including Postman
        • 1
          Shareable Collections
        • 1
          Global & Collection level variables
        • 1
          Graphical view of response times historically
        • 1
          Integrations - StatusPage, PagerDuty, HipChat, Victorop
        • 1
          Run tests from multiple locations across globe
        • 1
          Schedule test collections to auto-run at intervals
        • 1
          Auto Re-run failed scheduled tests before notifying
        • 1
          Makes developing REST APIs easy
        • 1
          History feature - call history and response history
        • 1
          Restrict access by teams
        • 1
          Fully featured without looking cluttered
        • 1
          Can save and share scripts
        CONS OF RUNSCOPE
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Runscope posts

          RedLine13 logo

          RedLine13

          14
          21
          8
          (Almost) free load and performance testing in the cloud
          14
          21
          + 1
          8
          PROS OF REDLINE13
          • 4
            Easy to scale JMeter in the cloud cheaply
          • 2
            Easy to scale JMeter in the cloud for free or almost fr
          • 1
            Can run load agents in any EC2 Region
          • 1
            Generate JMeter Report in the cloud
          CONS OF REDLINE13
            Be the first to leave a con

            related RedLine13 posts

            Selenium logo

            Selenium

            13.7K
            10.8K
            522
            Web Browser Automation
            13.7K
            10.8K
            + 1
            522
            PROS OF SELENIUM
            • 172
              Automates browsers
            • 154
              Testing
            • 101
              Essential tool for running test automation
            • 24
              Remote Control
            • 24
              Record-Playback
            • 8
              Data crawling
            • 7
              Supports end to end testing
            • 6
              Functional testing
            • 6
              Easy set up
            • 4
              The Most flexible monitoring system
            • 3
              End to End Testing
            • 3
              Easy to integrate with build tools
            • 2
              Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
            • 2
              Record and playback
            • 2
              Compatible with Python
            • 2
              Easy to scale
            • 2
              Integration Tests
            • 0
              Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
            CONS OF SELENIUM
            • 8
              Flaky tests
            • 4
              Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
            • 1
              Update browser drivers

            related Selenium posts

            Kamil Kowalski
            Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 1.8M views

            When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

            See more
            Benjamin Poon
            QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 932.2K views

            For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

            With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

            See more
            Locust logo

            Locust

            159
            294
            50
            Define user behaviour with Python code, and swarm your system with millions of simultaneous users
            159
            294
            + 1
            50
            PROS OF LOCUST
            • 14
              Hackable
            • 11
              Supports distributed
            • 7
              Open source
            • 6
              Easy to use
            • 6
              Easy to setup
            • 4
              Fast
            • 2
              Test Anything
            CONS OF LOCUST
            • 1
              Bad design

            related Locust posts

            Shared insights
            on
            LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

            I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

            See more
            Vrashab Jian
            Shared insights
            on
            Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

            I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

            I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

            See more
            Apache JMeter logo

            Apache JMeter

            382
            258
            10
            An open source load testing tool
            382
            258
            + 1
            10
            PROS OF APACHE JMETER
            • 5
              Requires no programming knowledge
            • 3
              Supports distributed
            • 2
              Open-source
            CONS OF APACHE JMETER
            • 1
              It's GUI-first
            • 1
              Too complicated

            related Apache JMeter posts