Alternatives to Google Cloud DNS logo

Alternatives to Google Cloud DNS

Amazon Route 53, DNSimple, CloudFlare, GoDaddy, and Google Domains are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Google Cloud DNS.
2.4K
572
+ 1
44

What is Google Cloud DNS and what are its top alternatives?

Google Cloud DNS is a scalable and high-performance Domain Name System (DNS) service offered by Google Cloud Platform. It provides reliable and low-latency DNS resolution for your domains and delivers global coverage with low-latency DNS responses. Google Cloud DNS offers features such as automatic DNS deployment, manageability through the Google Cloud Console, and integration with other Google Cloud services. However, some limitations include the lack of advanced DNS features compared to other providers and potential costs associated with usage.

  1. Amazon Route 53: Amazon Route 53 is a highly available and scalable cloud Domain Name System (DNS) web service. It offers features such as health checks, routing policies, and traffic management for optimal performance. Pros: Strong integration with other AWS services, global coverage, and high availability. Cons: Cost can be higher compared to some other providers.

  2. Cloudflare DNS: Cloudflare DNS is a fast and secure Domain Name System (DNS) service known for its performance and security features such as DDoS protection, caching, and privacy protection. Pros: High performance, security features, and free usage tier. Cons: Limited advanced DNS functionalities.

  3. Azure DNS: Azure DNS is a reliable, secure, and high-performance Domain Name System (DNS) service provided by Microsoft Azure. It offers features such as DNS hosting, private zones, and integration with Azure services. Pros: Integration with Azure services, global coverage, and ease of use. Cons: Limited advanced DNS features.

  4. Dyn (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure): Dyn, now part of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, provides managed DNS services with features like Traffic Director, DynECT platform, and asynchronous DNS notification. Pros: Anycast network, Traffic Director feature, and global coverage. Cons: Potential higher costs for usage.

  5. DNS Made Easy: DNS Made Easy is a reliable and cost-effective managed DNS service that offers features like global Anycast network, advanced traffic management, and real-time reporting. Pros: Performance optimization tools, global Anycast network, and cost-effective pricing. Cons: UI can be complex for beginners.

  6. BlueCat DNS: BlueCat DNS is a DNS security and management solution that provides features like DNS security, IP address management, and automation capabilities. Pros: DNS security features, IP address management, and automation tools. Cons: Tends to be more focused on enterprise-level deployments.

  7. NS1: NS1 is a modern DNS platform that offers features such as intelligent traffic management, real-time data analytics, and built-in DDoS protection. Pros: Intelligent traffic routing, real-time data analytics, and built-in DDoS protection. Cons: Interface can be overwhelming for new users.

  8. PowerDNS: PowerDNS is an open-source DNS server software that provides authoritative, recursive, and DNSSEC functionality. It offers features like high performance, scalability, and extensibility through various modules. Pros: Open-source, extensibility, and support for various backends. Cons: Requires more technical knowledge for setup and configuration.

  9. Infoblox Secure DNS: Infoblox Secure DNS is a DNS security solution that offers features like DNS firewall, threat intelligence integration, and advanced reporting tools. Pros: DNS security features, threat intelligence integration, and reporting capabilities. Cons: Tends to be more suitable for large enterprises.

  10. Quad9: Quad9 is a free, privacy-focused DNS resolver service that protects users from phishing, malware, and other cyber threats. It offers features like DNS encryption, threat intelligence feeds, and privacy protection. Pros: Privacy-focused, security features, and free to use. Cons: Limited advanced DNS functionalities.

Top Alternatives to Google Cloud DNS

  • Amazon Route 53
    Amazon Route 53

    Amazon Route 53 is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating human readable names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Route 53 effectively connects user requests to infrastructure running in Amazon Web Services (AWS) – such as an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instance, an Amazon Elastic Load Balancer, or an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket – and can also be used to route users to infrastructure outside of AWS. ...

  • DNSimple
    DNSimple

    DNSimple provides the tools you need to manage your domains. We offer both a carefully crafted web interface for managing your domains and DNS records, as well as an HTTP API with various code libraries and tools. Buy, connect, operate! ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • GoDaddy
    GoDaddy

    Go Daddy makes registering Domain Names fast, simple, and affordable. It is a trusted domain registrar that empowers people with creative ideas to succeed online. ...

  • Google Domains
    Google Domains

    It is a domain registration service which includes top website builders. The privacy is included at no additional cost. It also includes simple domain management tools. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Git
    Git

    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. ...

  • GitHub
    GitHub

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together. ...

Google Cloud DNS alternatives & related posts

Amazon Route 53 logo

Amazon Route 53

14.3K
9.2K
678
A highly available and scalable Domain Name System (DNS) web service.
14.3K
9.2K
+ 1
678
PROS OF AMAZON ROUTE 53
  • 185
    High-availability
  • 148
    Simple
  • 103
    Backed by amazon
  • 76
    Fast
  • 54
    Auhtoritive dns servers are spread over different tlds
  • 29
    One stop solution for all our cloud needs
  • 26
    Easy setup and monitoring
  • 20
    Low-latency
  • 17
    Flexible
  • 15
    Secure
  • 3
    API available
  • 1
    Dynamically setup new clients
  • 1
    Easily add client DNS entries.
CONS OF AMAZON ROUTE 53
  • 2
    SLOW
  • 2
    Geo-based routing only works with AWS zones
  • 1
    Restrictive rate limit

related Amazon Route 53 posts

Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 4.7M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Khauth György
CTO at SalesAutopilot Kft. · | 12 upvotes · 550.5K views

I'm the CTO of a marketing automation SaaS. Because of the continuously increasing load we moved to the AWSCloud. We are using more and more features of AWS: Amazon CloudWatch, Amazon SNS, Amazon CloudFront, Amazon Route 53 and so on.

Our main Database is MySQL but for the hundreds of GB document data we use MongoDB more and more. We started to use Redis for cache and other time sensitive operations.

On the front-end we use jQuery UI + Smarty but now we refactor our app to use Vue.js with Vuetify. Because our app is relatively complex we need to use vuex as well.

On the development side we use GitHub as our main repo, Docker for local and server environment and Jenkins and AWS CodePipeline for Continuous Integration.

See more
DNSimple logo

DNSimple

140
121
84
We make DNS simple
140
121
+ 1
84
PROS OF DNSIMPLE
  • 26
    Simplified dns
  • 21
    Not GoDaddy
  • 14
    Powerful
  • 9
    Good pricing
  • 9
    RESTful API
  • 4
    Reliable and secure
  • 1
    Terraform integration
CONS OF DNSIMPLE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related DNSimple posts

    CloudFlare logo

    CloudFlare

    76K
    22.1K
    1.8K
    The Web Performance & Security Company.
    76K
    22.1K
    + 1
    1.8K
    PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
    • 424
      Easy setup, great cdn
    • 277
      Free ssl
    • 199
      Easy setup
    • 190
      Security
    • 180
      Ssl
    • 98
      Great cdn
    • 77
      Optimizer
    • 71
      Simple
    • 44
      Great UI
    • 28
      Great js cdn
    • 12
      Apps
    • 12
      HTTP/2 Support
    • 12
      DNS Analytics
    • 12
      AutoMinify
    • 9
      Rocket Loader
    • 9
      Ipv6
    • 9
      Easy
    • 8
      IPv6 "One Click"
    • 8
      Fantastic CDN service
    • 7
      DNSSEC
    • 7
      Nice DNS
    • 7
      SSHFP
    • 7
      Free GeoIP
    • 7
      Amazing performance
    • 7
      API
    • 7
      Cheapest SSL
    • 6
      SPDY
    • 6
      Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
    • 5
      Ubuntu
    • 5
      Asynchronous resource loading
    • 4
      Global Load Balancing
    • 4
      Performance
    • 4
      Easy Use
    • 3
      CDN
    • 2
      Registrar
    • 2
      Support for SSHFP records
    • 1
      Web3
    • 1
      Прохси
    • 1
      HTTPS3/Quic
    CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
    • 2
      No support for SSHFP records
    • 2
      Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

    related CloudFlare posts

    Eugene Cheah

    For inboxkitten.com, an opensource disposable email service;

    We migrated our serverless workload from Cloud Functions for Firebase to CloudFlare workers, taking advantage of the lower cost and faster-performing edge computing of Cloudflare network. Made possible due to our extremely low CPU and RAM overhead of our serverless functions.

    If I were to summarize the limitation of Cloudflare (as oppose to firebase/gcp functions), it would be ...

    1. <5ms CPU time limit
    2. Incompatible with express.js
    3. one script limitation per domain

    Limitations our workload is able to conform with (YMMV)

    For hosting of static files, we migrated from Firebase to CommonsHost

    More details on the trade-off in between both serverless providers is in the article

    See more
    CDG

    I use Laravel because it's the most advances PHP framework out there, easy to maintain, easy to upgrade and most of all : easy to get a handle on, and to follow every new technology ! PhpStorm is our main software to code, as of simplicity and full range of tools for a modern application.

    Google Analytics Analytics of course for a tailored analytics, Bulma as an innovative CSS framework, coupled with our Sass (Scss) pre-processor.

    As of more basic stuff, we use HTML5, JavaScript (but with Vue.js too) and Webpack to handle the generation of all this.

    To deploy, we set up Buddy to easily send the updates on our nginx / Ubuntu server, where it will connect to our GitHub Git private repository, pull and do all the operations needed with Deployer .

    CloudFlare ensure the rapidity of distribution of our content, and Let's Encrypt the https certificate that is more than necessary when we'll want to sell some products with our Stripe api calls.

    Asana is here to let us list all the functionalities, possibilities and ideas we want to implement.

    See more
    GoDaddy logo

    GoDaddy

    548
    494
    11
    Your all in one solution to grow online
    548
    494
    + 1
    11
    PROS OF GODADDY
    • 8
      Flexible payment methods for domains
    • 3
      .io support
    CONS OF GODADDY
    • 2
      Constantly trying to upsell you
    • 1
      Not a great UI

    related GoDaddy posts

    I'm planning to make a web app with browser games that would be a Progressive Web App. I decided to use Vue.js as the front framework and Firebase to store basic information about users. Then I found out about Nuxt.js and I figured it could be really handy for making the project as PWA.

    The thing is, that I don't know if I will need Server Side Rendering for this, I couldn't find a lot of information but from what I know, the web app doesn't need SSR to be PWA. I am not sure how this would work with JavaScript browser games made with frameworks like Phaser or melon.js. Also, I host my website on GoDaddy and I've heard that it's quite hard to set up SSR with cPanel.

    So my questions are:

    Should I use SSR for Progressive Web Application built with Nuxt, filled with javascript browser games that are lazily loaded, or does that not make sense? If it makes sense, would SSR work with godaddy hosting and cPanel?

    Any help would be appreciated!

    See more
    Deep Shah
    Software Engineer at Amazon · | 6 upvotes · 952.9K views

    I only know Java and so thinking of building a web application in the following order. I need some help on what alternatives I can choose. Open to replace components, services, or infrastructure.

    • Frontend: AngularJS, Bootstrap
    • Web Framework: Spring Boot
    • Database: Amazon DynamoDB
    • Authentication: Auth0
    • Deployment: Amazon EC2 Container Service
    • Local Testing: Docker
    • Marketing: Mailchimp (Separately Export from Auth0)
    • Website Domain: GoDaddy
    • Routing: Amazon Route 53

    PS: Open to exploring options of going completely native ( AWS Lambda, AWS Security but have to learn all)

    See more
    Google Domains logo

    Google Domains

    222
    219
    3
    A domain registration service
    222
    219
    + 1
    3
    PROS OF GOOGLE DOMAINS
    • 2
      Minimalist Design
    • 1
      Great support
    CONS OF GOOGLE DOMAINS
    • 1
      It takes long time for DNS propagation

    related Google Domains posts

    which is BETTER? I get unlimited sites effectively (minus the fees for domains themselves)... I am a google-phile, but I also want my current site to maintain google email....not pay 7.20/usr/mo extra. DreamHost is relatively expensive after about a year or two. i dont know enough yet about Google Domains and what it comes with. Dreamhost gives you direct SQL access, unlimited emails, WordPress sites, etc.

    See more
    JavaScript logo

    JavaScript

    352.4K
    268.2K
    8.1K
    Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
    352.4K
    268.2K
    + 1
    8.1K
    PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 1.7K
      Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 1.5K
      It's everywhere
    • 1.2K
      Lots of great frameworks
    • 897
      Fast
    • 745
      Light weight
    • 425
      Flexible
    • 392
      You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
    • 286
      Non-blocking i/o
    • 237
      Ubiquitousness
    • 191
      Expressive
    • 55
      Extended functionality to web pages
    • 49
      Relatively easy language
    • 46
      Executed on the client side
    • 30
      Relatively fast to the end user
    • 25
      Pure Javascript
    • 21
      Functional programming
    • 15
      Async
    • 13
      Full-stack
    • 12
      Setup is easy
    • 12
      Future Language of The Web
    • 12
      Its everywhere
    • 11
      Because I love functions
    • 11
      JavaScript is the New PHP
    • 10
      Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
    • 9
      Expansive community
    • 9
      Everyone use it
    • 9
      Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
    • 9
      Easy
    • 8
      Most Popular Language in the World
    • 8
      Powerful
    • 8
      Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
    • 8
      For the good parts
    • 8
      No need to use PHP
    • 8
      Easy to hire developers
    • 7
      Agile, packages simple to use
    • 7
      Love-hate relationship
    • 7
      Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
    • 7
      Evolution of C
    • 7
      It's fun
    • 7
      Hard not to use
    • 7
      Versitile
    • 7
      Its fun and fast
    • 7
      Nice
    • 7
      Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
    • 7
      Supports lambdas and closures
    • 6
      It let's me use Babel & Typescript
    • 6
      Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
    • 6
      1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
    • 6
      Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
    • 6
      Easy to make something
    • 5
      Clojurescript
    • 5
      Promise relationship
    • 5
      Stockholm Syndrome
    • 5
      Function expressions are useful for callbacks
    • 5
      Scope manipulation
    • 5
      Everywhere
    • 5
      Client processing
    • 5
      What to add
    • 4
      Because it is so simple and lightweight
    • 4
      Only Programming language on browser
    • 1
      Test
    • 1
      Hard to learn
    • 1
      Test2
    • 1
      Not the best
    • 1
      Easy to understand
    • 1
      Subskill #4
    • 1
      Easy to learn
    • 0
      Hard 彤
    CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
    • 22
      A constant moving target, too much churn
    • 20
      Horribly inconsistent
    • 15
      Javascript is the New PHP
    • 9
      No ability to monitor memory utilitization
    • 8
      Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
    • 7
      Thinks strange results are better than errors
    • 6
      Can be ugly
    • 3
      No GitHub
    • 2
      Slow

    related JavaScript posts

    Zach Holman

    Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

    But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

    But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

    Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

    See more
    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 10.9M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more
    Git logo

    Git

    291.4K
    174.8K
    6.6K
    Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
    291.4K
    174.8K
    + 1
    6.6K
    PROS OF GIT
    • 1.4K
      Distributed version control system
    • 1.1K
      Efficient branching and merging
    • 959
      Fast
    • 845
      Open source
    • 726
      Better than svn
    • 368
      Great command-line application
    • 306
      Simple
    • 291
      Free
    • 232
      Easy to use
    • 222
      Does not require server
    • 27
      Distributed
    • 22
      Small & Fast
    • 18
      Feature based workflow
    • 15
      Staging Area
    • 13
      Most wide-spread VSC
    • 11
      Role-based codelines
    • 11
      Disposable Experimentation
    • 7
      Frictionless Context Switching
    • 6
      Data Assurance
    • 5
      Efficient
    • 4
      Just awesome
    • 3
      Github integration
    • 3
      Easy branching and merging
    • 2
      Compatible
    • 2
      Flexible
    • 2
      Possible to lose history and commits
    • 1
      Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing
    • 1
      Light
    • 1
      Team Integration
    • 1
      Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
    • 1
      Easy
    • 1
      Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast
    • 1
      CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome
    • 1
      It's what you do
    • 0
      Phinx
    CONS OF GIT
    • 16
      Hard to learn
    • 11
      Inconsistent command line interface
    • 9
      Easy to lose uncommitted work
    • 7
      Worst documentation ever possibly made
    • 5
      Awful merge handling
    • 3
      Unexistent preventive security flows
    • 3
      Rebase hell
    • 2
      When --force is disabled, cannot rebase
    • 2
      Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly
    • 1
      Doesn't scale for big data

    related Git posts

    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 9.7M views

    Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

    • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
    • Respectively Git as revision control system
    • SourceTree as Git GUI
    • Visual Studio Code as IDE
    • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
    • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
    • SonarQube as quality gate
    • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
    • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
    • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
    • Heroku for deploying in test environments
    • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
    • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
    • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
    • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
    • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

    The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

    • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
    • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
    • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
    • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
    • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
    • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
    See more
    Tymoteusz Paul
    Devops guy at X20X Development LTD · | 23 upvotes · 8.7M views

    Often enough I have to explain my way of going about setting up a CI/CD pipeline with multiple deployment platforms. Since I am a bit tired of yapping the same every single time, I've decided to write it up and share with the world this way, and send people to read it instead ;). I will explain it on "live-example" of how the Rome got built, basing that current methodology exists only of readme.md and wishes of good luck (as it usually is ;)).

    It always starts with an app, whatever it may be and reading the readmes available while Vagrant and VirtualBox is installing and updating. Following that is the first hurdle to go over - convert all the instruction/scripts into Ansible playbook(s), and only stopping when doing a clear vagrant up or vagrant reload we will have a fully working environment. As our Vagrant environment is now functional, it's time to break it! This is the moment to look for how things can be done better (too rigid/too lose versioning? Sloppy environment setup?) and replace them with the right way to do stuff, one that won't bite us in the backside. This is the point, and the best opportunity, to upcycle the existing way of doing dev environment to produce a proper, production-grade product.

    I should probably digress here for a moment and explain why. I firmly believe that the way you deploy production is the same way you should deploy develop, shy of few debugging-friendly setting. This way you avoid the discrepancy between how production work vs how development works, which almost always causes major pains in the back of the neck, and with use of proper tools should mean no more work for the developers. That's why we start with Vagrant as developer boxes should be as easy as vagrant up, but the meat of our product lies in Ansible which will do meat of the work and can be applied to almost anything: AWS, bare metal, docker, LXC, in open net, behind vpn - you name it.

    We must also give proper consideration to monitoring and logging hoovering at this point. My generic answer here is to grab Elasticsearch, Kibana, and Logstash. While for different use cases there may be better solutions, this one is well battle-tested, performs reasonably and is very easy to scale both vertically (within some limits) and horizontally. Logstash rules are easy to write and are well supported in maintenance through Ansible, which as I've mentioned earlier, are at the very core of things, and creating triggers/reports and alerts based on Elastic and Kibana is generally a breeze, including some quite complex aggregations.

    If we are happy with the state of the Ansible it's time to move on and put all those roles and playbooks to work. Namely, we need something to manage our CI/CD pipelines. For me, the choice is obvious: TeamCity. It's modern, robust and unlike most of the light-weight alternatives, it's transparent. What I mean by that is that it doesn't tell you how to do things, doesn't limit your ways to deploy, or test, or package for that matter. Instead, it provides a developer-friendly and rich playground for your pipelines. You can do most the same with Jenkins, but it has a quite dated look and feel to it, while also missing some key functionality that must be brought in via plugins (like quality REST API which comes built-in with TeamCity). It also comes with all the common-handy plugins like Slack or Apache Maven integration.

    The exact flow between CI and CD varies too greatly from one application to another to describe, so I will outline a few rules that guide me in it: 1. Make build steps as small as possible. This way when something breaks, we know exactly where, without needing to dig and root around. 2. All security credentials besides development environment must be sources from individual Vault instances. Keys to those containers should exist only on the CI/CD box and accessible by a few people (the less the better). This is pretty self-explanatory, as anything besides dev may contain sensitive data and, at times, be public-facing. Because of that appropriate security must be present. TeamCity shines in this department with excellent secrets-management. 3. Every part of the build chain shall consume and produce artifacts. If it creates nothing, it likely shouldn't be its own build. This way if any issue shows up with any environment or version, all developer has to do it is grab appropriate artifacts to reproduce the issue locally. 4. Deployment builds should be directly tied to specific Git branches/tags. This enables much easier tracking of what caused an issue, including automated identifying and tagging the author (nothing like automated regression testing!).

    Speaking of deployments, I generally try to keep it simple but also with a close eye on the wallet. Because of that, I am more than happy with AWS or another cloud provider, but also constantly peeking at the loads and do we get the value of what we are paying for. Often enough the pattern of use is not constantly erratic, but rather has a firm baseline which could be migrated away from the cloud and into bare metal boxes. That is another part where this approach strongly triumphs over the common Docker and CircleCI setup, where you are very much tied in to use cloud providers and getting out is expensive. Here to embrace bare-metal hosting all you need is a help of some container-based self-hosting software, my personal preference is with Proxmox and LXC. Following that all you must write are ansible scripts to manage hardware of Proxmox, similar way as you do for Amazon EC2 (ansible supports both greatly) and you are good to go. One does not exclude another, quite the opposite, as they can live in great synergy and cut your costs dramatically (the heavier your base load, the bigger the savings) while providing production-grade resiliency.

    See more
    GitHub logo

    GitHub

    280.6K
    244.8K
    10.3K
    Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects
    280.6K
    244.8K
    + 1
    10.3K
    PROS OF GITHUB
    • 1.8K
      Open source friendly
    • 1.5K
      Easy source control
    • 1.3K
      Nice UI
    • 1.1K
      Great for team collaboration
    • 867
      Easy setup
    • 504
      Issue tracker
    • 486
      Great community
    • 483
      Remote team collaboration
    • 451
      Great way to share
    • 442
      Pull request and features planning
    • 147
      Just works
    • 132
      Integrated in many tools
    • 121
      Free Public Repos
    • 116
      Github Gists
    • 112
      Github pages
    • 83
      Easy to find repos
    • 62
      Open source
    • 60
      It's free
    • 60
      Easy to find projects
    • 56
      Network effect
    • 49
      Extensive API
    • 43
      Organizations
    • 42
      Branching
    • 34
      Developer Profiles
    • 32
      Git Powered Wikis
    • 30
      Great for collaboration
    • 24
      It's fun
    • 23
      Clean interface and good integrations
    • 22
      Community SDK involvement
    • 20
      Learn from others source code
    • 16
      Because: Git
    • 14
      It integrates directly with Azure
    • 10
      Standard in Open Source collab
    • 10
      Newsfeed
    • 8
      It integrates directly with Hipchat
    • 8
      Fast
    • 8
      Beautiful user experience
    • 7
      Easy to discover new code libraries
    • 6
      Smooth integration
    • 6
      Cloud SCM
    • 6
      Nice API
    • 6
      Graphs
    • 6
      Integrations
    • 6
      It's awesome
    • 5
      Quick Onboarding
    • 5
      Reliable
    • 5
      Remarkable uptime
    • 5
      CI Integration
    • 5
      Hands down best online Git service available
    • 4
      Uses GIT
    • 4
      Version Control
    • 4
      Simple but powerful
    • 4
      Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
    • 4
      Free HTML hosting
    • 4
      Security options
    • 4
      Loved by developers
    • 4
      Easy to use and collaborate with others
    • 3
      Ci
    • 3
      IAM
    • 3
      Nice to use
    • 3
      Easy deployment via SSH
    • 2
      Easy to use
    • 2
      Leads the copycats
    • 2
      All in one development service
    • 2
      Free private repos
    • 2
      Free HTML hostings
    • 2
      Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
    • 2
      Beautiful
    • 2
      Easy source control and everything is backed up
    • 2
      IAM integration
    • 2
      Very Easy to Use
    • 2
      Good tools support
    • 2
      Issues tracker
    • 2
      Never dethroned
    • 2
      Self Hosted
    • 1
      Dasf
    • 1
      Profound
    CONS OF GITHUB
    • 54
      Owned by micrcosoft
    • 38
      Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
    • 15
      Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
    • 10
      API scoping could be better
    • 9
      Only 3 collaborators for private repos
    • 4
      Limited featureset for issue management
    • 3
      Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
    • 2
      GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
    • 1
      No multilingual interface
    • 1
      Takes a long time to commit
    • 1
      Expensive

    related GitHub posts

    Johnny Bell

    I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

    I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

    I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

    Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

    Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

    With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

    If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

    See more
    Russel Werner
    Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.5M views

    StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

    Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

    #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

    See more