Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Google Compute Engine

12.4K
9.2K
+ 1
423
Socket.IO

13.5K
10.9K
+ 1
776
Add tool

Google Compute Engine vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

Key differences between Google Compute Engine and Socket.IO

1. Scalability:

Google Compute Engine provides the ability to scale up or down resources based on demand, allowing users to easily handle fluctuations in traffic and workload. Socket.IO, on the other hand, is a JavaScript library that enables real-time communication between clients and servers, but it does not directly provide scalability features.

2. Purpose:

Google Compute Engine is a Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) platform that allows users to create and manage virtual machines in the cloud. It is primarily designed for running applications and hosting services. On the other hand, Socket.IO is a library mainly used for building real-time web applications that require bi-directional communication between clients and servers.

3. Flexibility:

Google Compute Engine offers a wide range of virtual machine configurations and operating system choices, providing users with flexibility in customizing their computing environment. Whereas, Socket.IO is focused on providing real-time communication capabilities and does not provide as much flexibility in terms of infrastructure setup and customization.

4. Real-time communication:

Socket.IO is specifically built to facilitate real-time communication between clients and servers, making it well-suited for applications that require instant updates and notifications. Google Compute Engine, on the other hand, provides more general computing capabilities and does not have built-in real-time communication features.

5. Managed services:

Google Compute Engine offers a range of managed services, such as managed databases and Kubernetes Engine, which simplify the deployment and management of applications. Socket.IO does not provide comparable managed services and requires users to handle the server-side infrastructure themselves.

6. Integration with other Google Cloud services:

Google Compute Engine seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, allowing users to leverage services like Google Cloud Storage and BigQuery. Socket.IO, being a standalone JavaScript library, does not have direct integration with Google Cloud services.

In summary, Google Compute Engine is a scalable infrastructure platform for running applications and hosting services, offering flexibility, managed services, and integration with other Google Cloud services. Socket.IO, on the other hand, is a JavaScript library focused on facilitating real-time communication for web applications, but lacks the infrastructure capabilities and managed services of Google Compute Engine.

Advice on Google Compute Engine and Socket.IO
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 504.4K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Decisions about Google Compute Engine and Socket.IO
Stephen Fox
Artificial Intelligence Fellow · | 2 upvotes · 202.6K views

GCE is much more user friendly than EC2, though Amazon has come a very long way since the early days (pre-2010's). This can be seen in how easy it is to edit the storage attached to an instance in GCE: it's under the instance details and is edited inline. In AWS you have to click the instance > click the storage block device (new screen) > click the edit option (new modal) > resize the volume > confirm (new model) then wait a very long time. Google's is nearly instant.

  • In both cases, the instance much be shut down.

There also the preference between "user burden-of-security" and automatic security: AWS goes for the former, GCE the latter.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Google Compute Engine
Pros of Socket.IO
  • 87
    Backed by google
  • 79
    Easy to scale
  • 75
    High-performance virtual machines
  • 57
    Performance
  • 52
    Fast and easy provisioning
  • 15
    Load balancing
  • 12
    Compliance and security
  • 9
    Kubernetes
  • 8
    GitHub Integration
  • 7
    Consistency
  • 4
    Free $300 credit (12 months)
  • 3
    One Click Setup Options
  • 3
    Good documentation
  • 2
    Great integration and product support
  • 2
    Escort
  • 2
    Ease of Use and GitHub support
  • 1
    Nice UI
  • 1
    Easy Snapshot and Backup feature
  • 1
    Integration with mobile notification services
  • 1
    Low cost
  • 1
    Support many OS
  • 1
    Very Reliable
  • 219
    Real-time
  • 143
    Node.js
  • 141
    Event-based communication
  • 102
    Open source
  • 102
    WebSockets
  • 26
    Binary streaming
  • 21
    No internet dependency
  • 10
    Large community
  • 6
    Push notification
  • 5
    Ease of access and setup
  • 1
    Test

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Google Compute Engine
Cons of Socket.IO
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 12
      Bad documentation
    • 4
      Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
    • 3
      Doesn't work on React Native
    • 2
      Small community
    • 2
      Websocket Errors

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Google Compute Engine?

    Google Compute Engine is a service that provides virtual machines that run on Google infrastructure. Google Compute Engine offers scale, performance, and value that allows you to easily launch large compute clusters on Google's infrastructure. There are no upfront investments and you can run up to thousands of virtual CPUs on a system that has been designed from the ground up to be fast, and to offer strong consistency of performance.

    What is Socket.IO?

    It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Google Compute Engine?
    What companies use Socket.IO?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Google Compute Engine?
    What tools integrate with Socket.IO?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Google Compute Engine and Socket.IO?
    Google App Engine
    Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
    DigitalOcean
    We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.
    Google Cloud Platform
    It helps you build what's next with secure infrastructure, developer tools, APIs, data analytics and machine learning. It is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube.
    Amazon EC2
    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
    Microsoft Azure
    Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.
    See all alternatives