Celoxis vs Jira

Overview

Jira

Stacks62.5K

Followers49.5K

Votes1.2K

Celoxis

Stacks3

Followers6

Votes0

Celoxis vs Jira: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing project management tools, Celoxis and Jira are two popular choices. Both platforms offer a wide range of features to help teams collaborate, track progress, and deliver projects successfully. However, there are key differences between Celoxis and Jira that set them apart.

Customization: Celoxis provides extensive customization options for fields, modules, and workflows, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific needs. On the other hand, Jira offers more limited customization capabilities, especially in terms of custom fields and workflows. This makes Celoxis a more flexible choice for teams with unique project requirements.
Resource Management: Celoxis excels in resource management, offering robust features for resource allocation, capacity planning, and tracking. Jira, while capable of tracking resources, does not provide the same level of detail and functionality as Celoxis in this area. For teams that prioritize resource optimization, Celoxis may be the better fit.
Financial Management: Celoxis includes comprehensive financial management tools, such as budget tracking, expense management, and billing features. In contrast, Jira lacks built-in financial management capabilities, requiring teams to integrate with external tools for managing project finances. This makes Celoxis a more all-in-one solution for teams that need to closely monitor project budgets.
Collaboration Tools: Jira focuses heavily on issue tracking and agile project management, offering a wide range of tools for teams to work together on tasks and tickets. While Celoxis also includes collaboration features, such as discussion boards and real-time updates, it may not be as specialized in this area as Jira. Teams looking for a dedicated collaboration platform may prefer Jira over Celoxis.
Integration Capabilities: Jira boasts a large marketplace of integrations and plugins that allow users to extend the platform's functionality and connect with other tools in their tech stack. Celoxis, while offering some integrations, may not have the same breadth and depth of integrations as Jira. Teams that rely on seamless integrations with other tools may find Jira more suitable for their needs.
User Interface: Celoxis is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it easy for new users to navigate and adopt the platform. Jira, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and may require more time for users to become proficient in using all its features. For teams that prioritize ease of use and quick onboarding, Celoxis may be the preferred choice.

In Summary, when choosing between Celoxis and Jira, consider factors such as customization, resource management, financial management, collaboration tools, integration capabilities, and user interface to determine which platform best aligns with your team's project management needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jira, Celoxis

Jakub

Node.js Software Engineer at Araclx

Mar 6, 2020

Decidedon

YouTrack

Jira

JetBrains Space

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

329k views329k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira	Celoxis
Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.	It is a web based project management software system, ideal for small teams and small projects to large multi-million dollar enterprise projects.
Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use	Project portfolio management; Project templates; Clickable and customizable charts; Client collaboration (FREE); Create and update tasks via email; Cross-project dependencies; Custom fields – include them in charts, filters, and output columns; Departments and role-based security.
Statistics
Stacks 62.5K	Stacks 3
Followers 49.5K	Followers 6
Votes 1.2K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 310 Powerful 254 Flexible 149 Easy separation of projects 113 Run in the cloud 105 Code integration Cons 8 Rather expensive 5 Large memory requirement 2 Slow 1 Cloud or Datacenter only	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Acunote Pivotal Tracker Bugsnag SnapEngage HipChat New Relic Zendesk Zopim UserVoice Balsamiq	Trello Google Drive Slack Salesforce Sales Cloud Zapier Zendesk OneLogin Google Sheets Okta Gravity Forms

What are some alternatives to Jira, Celoxis?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Confluence

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

Redmine

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Taskulu

Taskulu is a collaborative project planning service. It combines task management, real-time chat and time tracking into a single interface.

Notion

A new tool that blends your everyday work apps into one. It's a unified and collaborative workspace for you and your team

Aha!

Set product strategy, visualize and share roadmaps, and articulate features so your product development teams can build what matters.

Ora

Ora enables you to customize your projects and collaborate the way you want! Choose an existing methodology or create your own. Ora has everything your team might need to boost productivity and collaborate! Task management, kanban, lists...

Related Comparisons

Celoxis vs Jira: What are the differences?

Introduction

Customization: Celoxis provides extensive customization options for fields, modules, and workflows, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific needs. On the other hand, Jira offers more limited customization capabilities, especially in terms of custom fields and workflows. This makes Celoxis a more flexible choice for teams with unique project requirements.
Resource Management: Celoxis excels in resource management, offering robust features for resource allocation, capacity planning, and tracking. Jira, while capable of tracking resources, does not provide the same level of detail and functionality as Celoxis in this area. For teams that prioritize resource optimization, Celoxis may be the better fit.
Financial Management: Celoxis includes comprehensive financial management tools, such as budget tracking, expense management, and billing features. In contrast, Jira lacks built-in financial management capabilities, requiring teams to integrate with external tools for managing project finances. This makes Celoxis a more all-in-one solution for teams that need to closely monitor project budgets.
Collaboration Tools: Jira focuses heavily on issue tracking and agile project management, offering a wide range of tools for teams to work together on tasks and tickets. While Celoxis also includes collaboration features, such as discussion boards and real-time updates, it may not be as specialized in this area as Jira. Teams looking for a dedicated collaboration platform may prefer Jira over Celoxis.
Integration Capabilities: Jira boasts a large marketplace of integrations and plugins that allow users to extend the platform's functionality and connect with other tools in their tech stack. Celoxis, while offering some integrations, may not have the same breadth and depth of integrations as Jira. Teams that rely on seamless integrations with other tools may find Jira more suitable for their needs.
User Interface: Celoxis is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it easy for new users to navigate and adopt the platform. Jira, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and may require more time for users to become proficient in using all its features. For teams that prioritize ease of use and quick onboarding, Celoxis may be the preferred choice.

Celoxis vs Jira

Overview

Celoxis vs Jira: What are the differences?