Cloud Foundry vs DigitalOcean

Overview

DigitalOcean

Stacks18.2K

Followers13.3K

Votes2.6K

Cloud Foundry

Stacks188

Followers346

Votes5

Cloud Foundry vs DigitalOcean: What are the differences?

Ease of Deployment: Cloud Foundry is an open-source platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a seamless deployment experience, allowing developers to easily deploy and scale applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. On the other hand, DigitalOcean is an infrastructure as a service (IaaS) provider that gives users full control over their virtual servers, requiring more manual configuration and setup compared to Cloud Foundry.
Pricing Model: Cloud Foundry offers a consumption-based pricing model, where users only pay for the resources they use, making it cost-effective for small businesses and startups. In contrast, DigitalOcean follows a traditional pay-as-you-go pricing model, providing a predictable cost structure for users who prefer fixed pricing plans.
Managed Services: Cloud Foundry provides a wide range of managed services such as databases, messaging queues, and logging services, making it easier for developers to integrate these services into their applications. DigitalOcean, on the other hand, offers basic cloud infrastructure services and relies on third-party providers for additional managed services, leading to a more modular approach to service offerings.
Scalability: Cloud Foundry is designed to automatically scale applications based on demand, providing high availability and performance without manual intervention. DigitalOcean, while offering scalability through features like load balancers and auto-scaling groups, requires more configuration and monitoring to achieve the same level of scalability as Cloud Foundry.
Community Support: Cloud Foundry has a large and active community of developers and contributors who regularly contribute to the platform's development and provide support through forums, meetups, and online resources. DigitalOcean also has a strong community presence, but its focus is more on providing tutorials and guides for users, rather than direct contributions to the platform's development.

In Summary, Cloud Foundry and DigitalOcean differ in their ease of deployment, pricing models, managed services, scalability, and community support, catering to different needs and preferences of developers and businesses.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on DigitalOcean, Cloud Foundry

Jerome/Zen

Software Engineer

Aug 2, 2020

Needs advice

DigitalOcean was where I began; its USD5/month is extremely competitive and the overall experience as highly user-friendly.

However, their offerings were lacking and integrating with other resources I had on AWS was getting more costly (due to transfer costs on AWS). Eventually I moved the entire project off DO's Droplets and onto AWS's EC2.

One may initially find the cost (w/o free tier) and interface of AWS daunting however with good planning you can achieve highly cost-efficient systems with savings plans, spot instances, etcetera.

Do not dive into AWS head-first! Seriously, don't. Stand back and read pricing documentation thoroughly. You can, not to the fault of AWS, easily go way overbudget. Your first action upon getting your AWS account should be to set up billing alarms for estimated and current bill totals.

264k views264k

Comments

Dalton

Nov 8, 2020

Decided

Chose Hetnzer over DigitalOcean and Linode because Hetzner provides much cheaper VPS with much better specs. DigitalOcean might seems like a good choice at first because of how popular it is. But in reality, if all you need is a simple VPS, you won't benefit much from the their oversubscribed datacenters which often underperform other competitors. Linode is also a good choice. They have cheaper options and performs slightly better than DigitalOcean. In the end, choosing a more affordable host helps you save money. That's important when you're running a tight ship.

65.1k views65.1k

Comments

Peter

Senior Software Engineer

Sep 20, 2020

Decided

While Media Temple is more expensive than DigitalOcean, sometimes it is like comparing apples and oranges. DigitalOcean provides what is called Virtual Private Servers ( VPS ). While you seem to be on your own dedicated server, you are, in fact, sharing the same hardware with others.

If you need to be on your own dedicated server, or have other hardware requirements, you do not really have as many options with DigitalOcean. But with Media Temple, the skies the limit ( but so is potentially the cost ).

67.7k views67.7k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

DigitalOcean	Cloud Foundry
We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.	Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
We provide all of our users with high-performance SSD Hard Drives, flexible API, and the ability to select to nearest data center location.;SSD Cloud Servers in 55 Seconds;We provide a 99.99% uptime SLA around network, power and virtual server availability. If we fail to deliver, we’ll credit you based on the amount of time that service was unavailable.;All servers come with 1Gb/sec. network interface. Plans start with 1TB per month and increase incrementally.;KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is one of the fastest-growing open source full virtualization solution for Linux. Our KVM virtualized droplets are designed to address a high level of security and performance.;With our SSD hard drives, you can expect much faster disk i/o performance when compared to a traditional storage medium (e.g. SATA).;We have created a simple name spaced API that provides complete control over your virtual private servers.;All cloud servers are built on powerful Hex Core machines with dedicated ECC Ram and RAID SSD storage.;Shared Private Networking enables Droplets to communicate with other Droplets in that same datacenter.;Transfer a copy of your Droplet snapshot to all regions (Amsterdam, San Francisco, and New York).;An intuitive user interface to control all of your virtual servers. Create, resize, rebuild and snapshot with single clicks.;Full featured DNS management allows you to easily manage your domains.;If you ever get locked out of your virtual server, you’ll be able to recover it with full console access.;Automatically set your server to be backed up. Or take a snapshot when you reach a milestone.	Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
Statistics
Stacks 18.2K	Stacks 188
Followers 13.3K	Followers 346
Votes 2.6K	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 560 Great value for money 364 Simple dashboard 362 Good pricing 300 Ssds 250 Nice ui Cons 4 Pricing 3 No live support chat	Pros 2 Perfectly aligned with springboot 1 Application health management 1 Free service discovery (Eureka) 1 Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
Integrations
Cloud 66	VMware vSphere Logentries Amazon EC2 OpenStack Papertrail Amazon VPC Splunk Cloud Sumo Logic

What are some alternatives to DigitalOcean, Cloud Foundry?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Amazon EC2

It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Microsoft Azure

Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine is a service that provides virtual machines that run on Google infrastructure. Google Compute Engine offers scale, performance, and value that allows you to easily launch large compute clusters on Google's infrastructure. There are no upfront investments and you can run up to thousands of virtual CPUs on a system that has been designed from the ground up to be fast, and to offer strong consistency of performance.

Linode

Get a server running in minutes with your choice of Linux distro, resources, and node location.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Scaleway

European cloud computing company proposing a complete & simple public cloud ecosystem, bare-metal servers & private datacenter infrastructures.

Related Comparisons

Cloud Foundry vs DigitalOcean: What are the differences?

Ease of Deployment: Cloud Foundry is an open-source platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a seamless deployment experience, allowing developers to easily deploy and scale applications without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. On the other hand, DigitalOcean is an infrastructure as a service (IaaS) provider that gives users full control over their virtual servers, requiring more manual configuration and setup compared to Cloud Foundry.
Pricing Model: Cloud Foundry offers a consumption-based pricing model, where users only pay for the resources they use, making it cost-effective for small businesses and startups. In contrast, DigitalOcean follows a traditional pay-as-you-go pricing model, providing a predictable cost structure for users who prefer fixed pricing plans.
Managed Services: Cloud Foundry provides a wide range of managed services such as databases, messaging queues, and logging services, making it easier for developers to integrate these services into their applications. DigitalOcean, on the other hand, offers basic cloud infrastructure services and relies on third-party providers for additional managed services, leading to a more modular approach to service offerings.
Scalability: Cloud Foundry is designed to automatically scale applications based on demand, providing high availability and performance without manual intervention. DigitalOcean, while offering scalability through features like load balancers and auto-scaling groups, requires more configuration and monitoring to achieve the same level of scalability as Cloud Foundry.
Community Support: Cloud Foundry has a large and active community of developers and contributors who regularly contribute to the platform's development and provide support through forums, meetups, and online resources. DigitalOcean also has a strong community presence, but its focus is more on providing tutorials and guides for users, rather than direct contributions to the platform's development.

Cloud Foundry vs DigitalOcean

Overview