StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Error Tracking
  4. Exception Monitoring
  5. Bugsnag vs LogRocket

Bugsnag vs LogRocket

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Stacks1.1K
Followers620
Votes267
LogRocket
LogRocket
Stacks277
Followers278
Votes137

Bugsnag vs LogRocket: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bugsnag and LogRocket are both software tools used by developers to monitor and debug applications. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart from each other. This article will highlight the main differences between Bugsnag and LogRocket.

  1. Error Monitoring vs. Session Replay: Bugsnag focuses primarily on error monitoring and reporting. It captures and tracks errors in real-time, providing detailed information about the root cause and allowing developers to prioritize and fix issues efficiently. On the other hand, LogRocket specializes in session replay, recording user interactions and providing video playback of exactly what the user did before an error occurred. This helps developers troubleshoot issues by providing a visual understanding of the problem.

  2. Browser and Mobile Support: Bugsnag offers support for web browsers, mobile apps, and server-side applications. It provides SDKs and plugins for various platforms, allowing developers to integrate Bugsnag into their projects seamlessly. LogRocket, on the other hand, primarily focuses on web applications and supports only modern web browsers. It offers SDKs and integrations specifically tailored for web development.

  3. Real-time Error Reporting vs. Full Session Playback: Bugsnag provides real-time error reporting, instantly notifying developers when an error occurs. It also captures contextual information such as user, device, and environment data, helping developers understand the impact and scope of an error. In contrast, LogRocket offers full session playback, allowing developers to see a complete replay of user sessions leading up to an error. This includes all interactions, network requests, and even console logs, providing a comprehensive view of the problem.

  4. Customizable Error Monitoring vs. User Experience Analytics: Bugsnag offers extensive customization options for error monitoring, allowing developers to set up custom error filters, notifications, and integrations. It also provides detailed error reports with stack traces, breadcrumbs, and metadata, enabling thorough error analysis. LogRocket, on the other hand, focuses more on user experience analytics, providing insights into user behavior, conversion funnels, and UX metrics. It helps developers understand how user interactions impact application performance and user satisfaction.

  5. Open Source SDK vs. Closed Source Solution: Bugsnag offers an open-source software development kit (SDK), allowing developers to access and modify the source code as per their requirements. This provides flexibility and customization options for integrating Bugsnag into different projects. LogRocket, on the other hand, is a closed-source solution, which means developers have limited access to the underlying code. While it provides a comprehensive set of features and functionality, customization options may be more restricted.

  6. Pricing Model: Bugsnag offers a pricing model based on the number of errors per month or the number of users/devices being tracked. This allows developers to choose a plan that suits their specific needs and scale as their application grows. LogRocket, on the other hand, offers a pricing model based on the number of sessions recorded. This pricing structure aligns with its focus on session replay and allows developers to evaluate the number of sessions they need to analyze based on their requirements.

In summary, Bugsnag specializes in real-time error monitoring and provides customizable solutions for tracking and prioritizing errors across different platforms, while LogRocket focuses on session replay and user experience analytics, offering video playback of user sessions leading up to an error.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bugsnag
Bugsnag
LogRocket
LogRocket

Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast.

LogRocket combines session replay, performance monitoring, and product analytics – empowering software teams to create the ideal product experience.

Root cause error grouping; Support for over 50 languages and platforms including JavaScript, iOS, Android, Python, Ruby and Java; Real-time alerting to chat, email or SMS; Full stacktrace per exception; Trace user actions leading to an error with Breadcrumbs; Debug quickly with user and environmental diagnostic data for every exception; Manage errors with snooze, silence and assigning issues; Issue tracker integration; SaaS or Offline; Spike detection alerting; Automatic regression detection; Include custom data such as A/B test group or customer tier; Track error rates by release and deploy; Trace customer bugs by email, name, ID or domain; SAML, Okta and One-Login support; Full API
Session replay; Inspect actions and state at any point in time; Network activity; Inspect console logs and JavaScript errors
Statistics
Stacks
1.1K
Stacks
277
Followers
620
Followers
278
Votes
267
Votes
137
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 45
    Lots of 3rd party integrations
  • 42
    Really reliable
  • 37
    Includes a free plan
  • 25
    No usage or rate limits
  • 23
    Design
Cons
  • 2
    Error grouping doesn't always work
  • 2
    Bad billing model
Pros
  • 21
    See a video of user using your website
  • 20
    See full user sessions
  • 18
    See why users ask for support
  • 18
    Console, network, and error logging
  • 18
    Detect user frustration
Integrations
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Android SDK
Android SDK
Angular
Angular
Django
Django
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
React Native
React Native
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Ember.js
Ember.js
Spring
Spring
Jira
Jira
Sentry
Sentry
Intercom
Intercom
Trello
Trello
Mixpanel
Mixpanel
GitHub
GitHub
Segment
Segment
Rollbar
Rollbar
Errorception
Errorception
Heap
Heap

What are some alternatives to Bugsnag, LogRocket?

Sentry

Sentry

Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health.

Rollbar

Rollbar

Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Opbeat

Opbeat

Opbeat is application monitoring for developers, and gives you performance metrics, error logging, release tracking and workflow in one smart product.

Airbrake

Airbrake

Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast.

Honeybadger

Honeybadger

Honeybadger does more than report errors, it helps you work with your team to fix them. Errors can be assigned. You can comment via email. And a fine-grained permissions system means you control who has access to each specific project.

Errbit

Errbit

Errbit is a tool for collecting and managing errors from other applications. It is Airbrake (formerly known as Hoptoad) API compliant, so if you are already using Airbrake, you can just point the airbrake gem to your Errbit server.

FullStory

FullStory

FullStory’s unmatched analytics engine automatically indexes every digital interaction with your site or app and empowers teams to measure, validate, and act on each experience at scale.

OverOps

OverOps

OverOps maps the DNA of code as it’s executing in pre-prod and production to Identify all issues and anomalies, and deliver True Root Cause to the right person, without relying on logs.

TrackJS

TrackJS

Production error monitoring and reporting for web applications. TrackJS provides deep insights into real user errors. See the user, network, and application events that tell the story of an error so you can actually fix them.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp