StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.5K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Stacks41.1K
Followers33.4K
Votes2.8K
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Stacks324
Followers826
Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub

  1. Ownership: One key difference between AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub is the ownership of the platform. AWS CodeCommit is owned and maintained by Amazon Web Services, Bitbucket is owned by Atlassian, and GitHub is owned by Microsoft.

  2. Integration: Another difference is the level of integration with other services. AWS CodeCommit is tightly integrated with other AWS services such as AWS CodePipeline and AWS CodeBuild, making it a seamless choice for users already using AWS infrastructure. Bitbucket offers integration with popular tools like Jira and Confluence, making it a preferred choice for Atlassian users. GitHub provides extensive integration with third-party applications and services, making it a highly flexible platform.

  3. Pricing: Pricing is another differentiating factor. AWS CodeCommit follows an AWS pricing model based on the number of active users, repositories, and data transfer. Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans with different feature sets and pricing tiers based on the number of users. GitHub offers a similar pricing model, with free plans for individual users and paid plans for organizations with additional features and collaboration tools.

  4. On-premises Deployment: One important difference is the availability of on-premises deployment options. AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service and does not provide on-premises deployment options. Bitbucket, on the other hand, offers both cloud-hosted and self-hosted options, allowing organizations to deploy it on their own servers. GitHub offers a hybrid deployment option with GitHub Enterprise, allowing organizations to have their own self-hosted instance.

  5. Community Support: The level of community support is also different across the platforms. AWS CodeCommit is primarily used by AWS customers and has a smaller community compared to Bitbucket and GitHub. Bitbucket has a larger community, particularly among Atlassian users, with a wide range of available resources and community support. GitHub has the largest and most active community, making it the go-to platform for open source projects.

  6. Security and Compliance: Finally, there are differences in terms of security and compliance features. AWS CodeCommit offers robust security features such as encryption in transit and at rest, integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), and compliance with various industry standards. Bitbucket also provides strong security features, including encryption and access control, but lacks some of the advanced compliance capabilities of AWS CodeCommit. GitHub offers similar security features with encryption and access control, but compliance features may vary depending on the deployment options.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub differ in terms of ownership, integration, pricing, deployment options, community support, and security features. Each platform caters to different user needs and preferences, making it important to evaluate these differences before selecting the most suitable platform for your development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Bitbucket, AWS CodeCommit

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Phillip
Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial
Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
Stacks
295.5K
Stacks
41.1K
Stacks
324
Followers
259.0K
Followers
33.4K
Followers
826
Votes
10.4K
Votes
2.8K
Votes
193
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 905
    Free private repos
  • 397
    Simple setup
  • 349
    Nice ui and tools
  • 342
    Unlimited private repositories
  • 240
    Affordable git hosting
Cons
  • 19
    Not much community activity
  • 17
    Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui
  • 15
    Quite buggy
  • 10
    Managed by enterprise Java company
  • 8
    CI tool is not free of charge
Pros
  • 44
    Free private repos
  • 26
    IAM integration
  • 24
    Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
  • 20
    Amazon feels the most Secure
  • 19
    Repo data encrypted at rest
Cons
  • 12
    UI sucks
  • 4
    SLOW
  • 3
    No Issue Tracker
  • 2
    NO LFS support
  • 2
    No webhooks
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Git
Git
AWS Cloud9
AWS Cloud9
Sentry
Sentry
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
npm
npm
Trello
Trello
Slack
Slack
Confluence
Confluence
Docker
Docker
Jira
Jira
Git
Git
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Bitbucket, AWS CodeCommit?

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

GitHub Enterprise

GitHub Enterprise

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Consul
Zookeeper

Consul vs Eureka vs Zookeeper