Overview

New Relic

Stacks21.0K

Followers8.7K

Votes1.9K

Airbrake

Stacks264

Followers298

Votes128

Airbrake vs New Relic: What are the differences?

Data Collection and Monitoring: One key difference between Airbrake and New Relic is that Airbrake primarily focuses on error tracking and monitoring, capturing and displaying errors that occur in your application. On the other hand, New Relic offers a much broader range of monitoring features, including application performance monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, and user experience monitoring.
Alerting Capabilities: Another significant difference is in the alerting capabilities of Airbrake and New Relic. Airbrake provides basic alerting for error notifications, allowing you to set up alerts based on error occurrence and severity. In contrast, New Relic offers more advanced alerting features, allowing you to set up alerts based on a wide range of performance metrics and thresholds.
Integration and Compatibility: Airbrake is commonly integrated with other tools used in the development and operations workflow, making it convenient for developers to track errors alongside their existing tools. New Relic, on the other hand, has extensive integrations with a wide range of systems and services, providing a more comprehensive monitoring solution for various aspects of your application.
Customization Options: While Airbrake is more focused on error tracking out of the box, New Relic offers extensive customization options for monitoring and analyzing different aspects of your application's performance. This allows users to tailor their monitoring setup according to their specific needs and requirements.
Scalability and Performance Impact: Airbrake is known for its lightweight and low-impact setup, making it suitable for small to medium-sized applications. In contrast, New Relic's comprehensive monitoring suite can have a more significant performance impact on larger-scale applications and may require more resources to operate effectively.
Price and Licensing: One of the key differences to consider when choosing between Airbrake and New Relic is the pricing and licensing model. Airbrake typically offers a simpler pricing structure based on the number of projects or errors tracked, while New Relic's pricing can vary based on the features and level of monitoring required, making it essential to assess your specific needs and budget.

In Summary, Airbrake and New Relic differ in their focus on error tracking vs. comprehensive monitoring, alerting capabilities, integration options, customization features, scalability, performance impact, and pricing models.

Advice on New Relic, Airbrake

Medeti

Jun 27, 2020

Needs adviceon

Amazon EKS

Kubernetes

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

1.51M views1.51M

Comments

Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 17, 2019

Decided

I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).

The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight

NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon

457k views457k

Comments

Attila

Founder at artkonekt

Mar 24, 2020

Decided

I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.

In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.

The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:

The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.

Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.

471k views471k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

New Relic	Airbrake
The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.	Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast.
Performance Data Retention;Real-User Response Time, Throughput, & Breakdown by Layer;App Response Time, Throughput, & Breakdown by Component;App Availability Monitoring, Alerting, and Notification;Automatic Application Topology Mapping;Server Resource and Availability Monitoring;Error Detection, Alerting, & Analysis;JVM Performance Analyzer;Database Call Response Time & Throughput;Performance Data API Access;Code Level Diagnostics, Transaction Tracing, & Stack Trace Details;Slow SQL and SQL Performance Details;Real-User Breakdown by Web Page, Browser, & Geography;Track Individual Key Transactions;Mobile Features- Alerting, Summary Data, Overview Page, Topo Map, HTTP Requests, HTTP Error Summary, HTTP Error Detail, Versions, Carriers, Devices, Geo Map	Dupe Detection- Developers will only receive an email once when an error occurs — rather than getting buried under an error email avalanche.;Auto Resolve- An action on each application deployment — that way developers can focus on the problems that exist today, not the ones from last month.;Github Aware- Airbrake is github-aware, and can link code in your Airbrake error stack traces to the corresponding locations on github.;RSS- Airbrake offers an RSS feed of error activity, so errors can be monitored using feed readers.;Lighthouse Integration- Airbrake integrates with the Lighthouse bug/ticket tracking application, for easy discussion of errors and integration with your existing workflow.;SSL Secure- Airbrake can be accessed over SSL-protected secure connections to keep your data completely private. The application itself is updated regularly with the latest security patches.;Multiple Projects- Easily track and navigate errors from multiple projects for up to 64 projects.;Fully supported platforms/languages- Ruby on Rails, iOS
Statistics
Stacks 21.0K	Stacks 264
Followers 8.7K	Followers 298
Votes 1.9K	Votes 128
Pros & Cons
Pros 414 Easy setup 344 Really powerful 245 Awesome visualization 194 Ease of use 151 Great ui Cons 20 Pricing model doesn't suit microservices 10 UI isn't great 7 Expensive 7 Visualizations aren't very helpful 5 Hard to understand why things in your app are breaking	Pros 28 Reliable 25 Consolidates similar errors 22 Easy setup 15 Slack Integration 10 Github Integration Cons 0 Rejects error report if non-latin characters exists
Integrations
AppHarbor Cloudability HP Cloud Compute cloudControl Papertrail Loggly Ducksboard Blitz Pivotal Tracker Red Hat OpenShift	GitHub ExpressJS Chef Slack PHP JavaScript Django Zapier Heroku Python

What are some alternatives to New Relic, Airbrake?

Sentry

Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health.

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Rollbar

Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra

Bugsnag

Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast.

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Opbeat

Opbeat is application monitoring for developers, and gives you performance metrics, error logging, release tracking and workflow in one smart product.

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster