Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Keras vs ML Kit: What are the differences?
- Model Flexibility: Keras offers a high level of flexibility in building neural networks, allowing for customization of network architecture, layer configurations, and optimization algorithms, while ML Kit provides pre-trained models for specific tasks like image labeling and text recognition, limiting customization options.
- Framework Dependency: Keras can be used with different backend frameworks like TensorFlow, Theano, and Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit, offering a wider range of options, whereas ML Kit is specifically designed to work with TensorFlow Lite, restricting the versatility in framework choices.
- Platform Availability: Keras can be used on various platforms such as Windows, Linux, and macOS, providing flexibility for developers, whereas ML Kit is primarily for mobile platforms like Android and iOS, limiting its use on other operating systems.
- Training Data: Keras requires developers to provide and manage their training data for model training, enabling complete control over the data used, whereas ML Kit uses pre-built datasets for its tasks, simplifying the development process but potentially limiting the accuracy of models due to lack of specialized training data.
- Custom Model Integration: Keras allows for the integration of custom-built models and components into the neural network architecture, giving developers more control over the model's behavior, whereas ML Kit focuses on utilizing pre-built models and does not provide extensive support for incorporating custom models.
- Development Environment: Keras can be integrated with popular IDEs like Jupyter Notebook and Google Colab, offering a familiar and feature-rich development environment, while ML Kit development is primarily done through Android Studio for Android apps and Xcode for iOS apps, requiring developers to adapt to these specific environments.
In Summary, Keras and ML Kit differ in model flexibility, framework dependencies, platform availability, training data requirements, custom model integration, and development environments.
For my company, we may need to classify image data. Keras provides a high-level Machine Learning framework to achieve this. Specifically, CNN models can be compactly created with little code. Furthermore, already well-proven classifiers are available in Keras, which could be used as Transfer Learning for our use case.
We chose Keras over PyTorch, another Machine Learning framework, as our preliminary research showed that Keras is more compatible with .js. You can also convert a PyTorch model into TensorFlow.js, but it seems that Keras needs to be a middle step in between, which makes Keras a better choice.
Pros of Keras
- Quality Documentation8
- Supports Tensorflow and Theano backends7
- Easy and fast NN prototyping7
Pros of ML Kit
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Keras
- Hard to debug4