StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data As A Service
  5. Matillion vs StreamSets

Matillion vs StreamSets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Matillion
Matillion
Stacks51
Followers71
Votes0
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
StreamSets
StreamSets
Stacks53
Followers133
Votes0

Matillion vs StreamSets: What are the differences?

  1. ** Scalability: ** Matillion offers horizontal scalability where you can add more nodes to the cluster, while StreamSets scales both vertically and horizontally enabling efficient resource utilization based on the workload.
  2. ** Ecosystem Integrations: ** Matillion specializes in integrating with cloud data warehouses such as Redshift, Snowflake, and BigQuery, whereas StreamSets has a broader range of connectors for various data sources like databases, cloud services, and data lakes.
  3. ** Transformation Complexity: ** Matillion provides a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface for data transformation, which simplifies the process for non-technical users; StreamSets offers more robust transformation capabilities but may require more technical expertise to utilize effectively.
  4. ** Job Orchestration: ** Matillion has robust job scheduling and orchestration features within its platform, while StreamSets leans more towards streaming data pipelines and may require external tools for advanced job scheduling.
  5. ** Cost Structure: ** Matillion typically follows a subscription-based pricing model which can be more predictable for budgeting, whereas StreamSets may have a more flexible pricing structure based on usage and connectors, which could be advantageous depending on the organization's needs.

In Summary, Matillion focuses on scalable cloud data warehouse integrations with user-friendly transformation interfaces, while StreamSets offers a broader range of data connectors and more advanced transformation capabilities at possibly varying cost structures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Matillion
Matillion
StreamSets
StreamSets

It is a modern, browser-based UI, with powerful, push-down ETL/ELT functionality. With a fast setup, you are up and running in minutes.

An end-to-end data integration platform to build, run, monitor and manage smart data pipelines that deliver continuous data for DataOps.

Edit, Transform and Load Data intuitively; Load Data from Dozens of Sources; 50% reduction in ETL development and maintenance effort ; Rich orchestration environment; Work as a team; Cheap; Billing via AWS.
Only StreamSets provides a single design experience for all design patterns (batch, streaming, CDC, ETL, ELT, and ML pipelines) for 10x greater developer productivity; smart data pipelines that are resilient to change for 80% less breakages; and a single pane of glass for managing and monitoring all pipelines across hybrid and cloud architectures to eliminate blind spots and control gaps.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
51
Stacks
53
Followers
71
Followers
133
Votes
0
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Cons
  • 2
    No user community
  • 1
    Crashes
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Zendesk
Zendesk
MongoDB Stitch
MongoDB Stitch
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
Cassandra
Cassandra
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Mixpanel
Mixpanel
HBase
HBase
Databricks
Databricks
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
MySQL
MySQL
gRPC
gRPC
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Cassandra
Cassandra
Hadoop
Hadoop
Redis
Redis

What are some alternatives to Matillion, StreamSets?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase