Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GitHub

278.5K
242.8K
+ 1
10.3K
Glitch

83
175
+ 1
42
Add tool

GitHub vs Glitch: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GitHub and Glitch

GitHub and Glitch are both popular platforms used for collaborating on coding projects, but they have some key differences that set them apart. Here are six significant differences between GitHub and Glitch:

  1. Hosting Approach: GitHub is primarily used for hosting and version control of git repositories, providing a platform for developers to collaboratively work on and manage code. On the other hand, Glitch focuses on providing an online coding environment where users can create and host their web applications, allowing real-time collaboration and immediate deployment without needing to worry about infrastructure setup.

  2. Project Scope: GitHub is more suitable for larger and complex projects that require detailed version control, documentation, and collaboration across a team or even a global community. It allows for branching, merging, and managing multiple contributors effectively. Glitch, on the other hand, is designed for smaller-scale projects and experimentation, where individuals or small teams can quickly prototype, experiment with, and showcase their web application ideas.

  3. Code Organization: GitHub organizes code repositories based on git workflows, allowing users to create branches, manage issues, and track changes effectively. It provides a comprehensive project management system with features like pull requests and code reviews. Glitch, however, provides a more intuitive and simplified approach by organizing projects as individual apps where all the code, assets, and configuration files are stored in a single place, making it easier to manage and share projects.

  4. Learning Resources: GitHub is rich in learning resources and documentation, making it an excellent platform for developers to collaborate, learn from others, and contribute to open-source projects. It offers a wide range of project repositories and code examples. Glitch, on the other hand, focuses more on the educational aspect and provides a wide range of beginner-friendly projects, tutorials, and challenges. It aims to help learners quickly get started with coding and web development.

  5. Deployment Options: GitHub offers various deployment options, ranging from hosting static websites using GitHub Pages to integrating with cloud platforms like Heroku or deploying to cloud services like AWS or Azure. Glitch, on the other hand, provides a seamless deployment experience where apps are instantly hosted on Glitch's own infrastructure by default. It simplifies the deployment process and allows users to make their projects accessible online with just a few clicks.

  6. Community and Social Features: GitHub is known for its vast developer community, making it a hub for open-source collaboration and contributing to the global programming community. It provides features like issue tracking, project boards, and social interactions with other developers. Glitch, although smaller in scale, aims to build a community where users can share their projects, collaborate, and get feedback. It emphasizes social interaction and encourages users to discover and remix projects created by others.

In summary, GitHub is a versatile platform for managing, collaborating, and version-controlling code repositories, suitable for larger coding projects and open-source contributions. Glitch, on the other hand, focuses on providing a simplified online coding environment for smaller-scale projects and beginner-friendly experimentation, with easy deployment and a social aspect for sharing and remixing projects.

Decisions about GitHub and Glitch
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 656.6K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

See more
Nazar Atamaniuk
Shared insights
on
DeployPlaceDeployPlaceGitHubGitHubGitLabGitLab

At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of GitHub
Pros of Glitch
  • 1.8K
    Open source friendly
  • 1.5K
    Easy source control
  • 1.3K
    Nice UI
  • 1.1K
    Great for team collaboration
  • 867
    Easy setup
  • 504
    Issue tracker
  • 486
    Great community
  • 482
    Remote team collaboration
  • 451
    Great way to share
  • 442
    Pull request and features planning
  • 147
    Just works
  • 132
    Integrated in many tools
  • 121
    Free Public Repos
  • 116
    Github Gists
  • 112
    Github pages
  • 83
    Easy to find repos
  • 62
    Open source
  • 60
    It's free
  • 60
    Easy to find projects
  • 56
    Network effect
  • 49
    Extensive API
  • 43
    Organizations
  • 42
    Branching
  • 34
    Developer Profiles
  • 32
    Git Powered Wikis
  • 30
    Great for collaboration
  • 24
    It's fun
  • 23
    Clean interface and good integrations
  • 22
    Community SDK involvement
  • 20
    Learn from others source code
  • 16
    Because: Git
  • 14
    It integrates directly with Azure
  • 10
    Newsfeed
  • 10
    Standard in Open Source collab
  • 8
    Fast
  • 8
    It integrates directly with Hipchat
  • 8
    Beautiful user experience
  • 7
    Easy to discover new code libraries
  • 6
    Smooth integration
  • 6
    Cloud SCM
  • 6
    Nice API
  • 6
    Graphs
  • 6
    Integrations
  • 6
    It's awesome
  • 5
    Quick Onboarding
  • 5
    Remarkable uptime
  • 5
    CI Integration
  • 5
    Hands down best online Git service available
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 4
    Free HTML hosting
  • 4
    Version Control
  • 4
    Simple but powerful
  • 4
    Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
  • 4
    Security options
  • 4
    Loved by developers
  • 4
    Uses GIT
  • 4
    Easy to use and collaborate with others
  • 3
    IAM
  • 3
    Nice to use
  • 3
    Ci
  • 3
    Easy deployment via SSH
  • 2
    Good tools support
  • 2
    Leads the copycats
  • 2
    Free private repos
  • 2
    Free HTML hostings
  • 2
    Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 2
    Never dethroned
  • 2
    IAM integration
  • 2
    Very Easy to Use
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    All in one development service
  • 2
    Self Hosted
  • 2
    Issues tracker
  • 2
    Easy source control and everything is backed up
  • 1
    Profound
  • 12
    Bang! App built
  • 9
    Instant APPification ;)
  • 7
    Auto commits
  • 4
    No no. limitation on free projects
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Tons of usable code
  • 2
    Awesome support
  • 2
    Very fast API creation. Especially for small apps
  • 1
    Github Integration

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of GitHub
Cons of Glitch
  • 53
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 37
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 8
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
  • 3
    Limited featureset for issue management
  • 2
    GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
  • 2
    Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
  • 1
    No multilingual interface
  • 1
    Takes a long time to commit
  • 1
    Expensive
  • 5
    UI could be better / cleaner
  • 2
    Limited Support/Diffficult to use Non-JS Languages
  • 1
    Automatically suspends proxies
  • 1
    Not good for big projects
  • 1
    Cannot delete project, only the source code is

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is GitHub?

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

What is Glitch?

Combining automated deployment, instant hosting and collaborative editing, Gomix gets you straight to coding. The apps you create are instantly live, hosted by us, and always up to date with your latest changes. Build products, prototype ideas, and hack solutions to problems.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use GitHub?
What companies use Glitch?
See which teams inside your own company are using GitHub or Glitch.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with GitHub?
What tools integrate with Glitch?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

DigitalOcean

GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
2
2356
GitHubOptimizelySegment+3
2
1174
Mar 18 2020 at 9:12AM

LaunchDarkly

GitHubLaunchDarkly+2
7
1106
JavaScriptGitHubReact+12
5
4133
GitHubDockerReact+17
40
36276
What are some alternatives to GitHub and Glitch?
GitLab
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Bitbucket
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
AWS CodeCommit
CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
Git
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
SVN (Subversion)
Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
See all alternatives