Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Git vs GitKraken: What are the differences?
Introduction
Git and GitKraken are both software tools used for version control and collaboration in software development. While both serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between Git and GitKraken that distinguish them from each other.
Platform Compatibility: Git is a command-line tool that can be used on various platforms such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, GitKraken is a standalone application that provides a graphical user interface (GUI) and is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux operating systems.
User Interface (UI): Git relies on command-line commands and requires users to have knowledge of specific commands to perform various version control actions. In contrast, GitKraken provides a visually appealing and intuitive UI that simplifies the version control process, allowing users to perform actions like branching, merging, and committing with simple drag-and-drop gestures.
Visual Representation: Git primarily displays file changes and commits through a text-based interface, which can sometimes make it difficult for users to visualize the project's history. GitKraken, on the other hand, offers a more visual representation of the repository with features like interactive graphs, code editors, and commit timelines, making it easier to understand the project's structure and history.
Collaboration Features: GitKraken provides additional collaboration features that enhance team coordination and communication. It allows users to view and manage pull requests, assign tasks, and create code reviews directly within the application. Git, on the other hand, does not have these collaboration features built-in, although it can integrate with other platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket for collaboration purposes.
Ease of Use for Beginners: GitKraken is more beginner-friendly compared to Git, especially for developers who are new to version control. The GUI provided by GitKraken simplifies the learning curve by visually representing actions and providing tooltips and hints, making it easier for beginners to grasp Git concepts and workflows. Git, being a command-line tool, requires users to understand and remember specific commands.
Customizability and Flexibility: Git offers a high level of customizability and flexibility due to its command-line interface. Developers can use various tools and scripts to automate tasks and fine-tune their Git workflows according to their specific needs. GitKraken, while providing a user-friendly experience, may have certain limitations compared to the flexibility provided by Git's command-line interface.
In summary, Git and GitKraken differ in terms of platform compatibility, user interface, visual representation, collaboration features, ease of use for beginners, and customizability. Git is a command-line tool compatible with multiple platforms and offers extensive customization options, while GitKraken is a GUI-based application with intuitive visuals, enhanced collaboration features, and a beginner-friendly approach.
Pros of Git
- Distributed version control system1.4K
- Efficient branching and merging1.1K
- Fast959
- Open source843
- Better than svn726
- Great command-line application368
- Simple306
- Free291
- Easy to use232
- Does not require server221
- Distributed28
- Small & Fast23
- Feature based workflow18
- Staging Area15
- Most wide-spread VSC13
- Disposable Experimentation11
- Role-based codelines11
- Frictionless Context Switching7
- Data Assurance6
- Efficient5
- Just awesome4
- Github integration3
- Easy branching and merging3
- Light2
- Compatible2
- Possible to lose history and commits2
- Flexible2
- Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing1
- Easy1
- Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system1
- Team Integration1
- Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast1
- CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome1
- It's what you do1
- Phinx0
Pros of GitKraken
- Dark theme59
- Best linux git client34
- Great overview29
- Full featured client21
- Gitflow support20
- Beautiful UI19
- Very easy to use18
- Graph16
- Works great on both linux and windows13
- Effortless13
- Easy Merge Conflict Tool6
- Amazing Github and Bitbucket integration5
- Great UX4
- Integration with GitHub3
- Automatic Repo Discovery3
- Submodule support3
- Easy to Learn and Setup3
- Super fast3
- Fuzzy find (CTRL P)2
- Very user friendly1
- Much more stable than source tree1
- Great for non-dev users1
- Because it has Linux client1
- Command palette (CTRL Shift P)1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Git
- Hard to learn16
- Inconsistent command line interface11
- Easy to lose uncommitted work9
- Worst documentation ever possibly made8
- Awful merge handling5
- Unexistent preventive security flows3
- Rebase hell3
- Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly2
- When --force is disabled, cannot rebase2
- Doesn't scale for big data1
Cons of GitKraken
- Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)4
- No edit/fixup in interactive rebase4
- Extremely slow when working with large repositories4
- Does not work like a Mac app3
- Do not allow to directly edit staging area3
- Not as many features as sourcetree3