Bitbucket vs GitKraken

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

GitKraken

Stacks725

Followers909

Votes290

Bitbucket vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides the key differences between Bitbucket and GitKraken. It includes specific differences that highlight the contrasting features and capabilities of both platforms. Markdown code format allows it to be easily used on a website or any other platform.

Deployment Options: Bitbucket provides both cloud-based and self-hosted deployment options, which allows individuals and organizations to choose the most suitable deployment method based on their requirements. On the other hand, GitKraken primarily focuses on a cloud-based deployment model, offering seamless integration with various cloud platforms.
Collaboration Tools: Bitbucket offers extensive collaboration features like pull requests, inline commenting, and code reviews, allowing teams to collaborate efficiently on code repositories. GitKraken, though it offers some collaboration features, has more limited functionality in this area compared to Bitbucket.
Interface Design: Bitbucket comes with an intuitive and user-friendly interface that is specifically designed for simplicity and ease of use. GitKraken, on the other hand, has a more visually appealing and interactive interface that provides a rich user experience.
Integration Capabilities: Bitbucket offers robust integration capabilities with a wide range of external tools and services like JIRA, Trello, and Jenkins. This seamless integration helps streamline the development and DevOps process. GitKraken also provides integration options, but the number of integrations and the level of depth may not be as extensive as what Bitbucket offers.
Pricing Model: Bitbucket has a flexible pricing model that caters to both individual developers and large organizations. It offers free plans for small teams and affordable paid plans for more advanced features and larger team sizes. GitKraken, while also having a free plan, focuses more on a subscription-based pricing model, which may suit individual developers or small teams less sparsely.
Version Control Support: Both Bitbucket and GitKraken support Git as the primary version control system. However, Bitbucket additionally supports Mercurial, providing users with an alternative option for version control.

In summary, Bitbucket and GitKraken differ in their deployment options, collaboration tools, interface design, integration capabilities, pricing models, and version control support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, GitKraken

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	GitKraken
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	-
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 725
Followers 33.4K	Followers 909
Votes 2.8K	Votes 290
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 60 Dark theme 34 Best linux git client 29 Great overview 21 Gitflow support 21 Full featured client Cons 4 No edit/fixup in interactive rebase 4 Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree) 4 Extremely slow when working with large repositories 3 Does not work like a Mac app 3 Not as many features as sourcetree
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Git

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, GitKraken?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Introduction

Deployment Options: Bitbucket provides both cloud-based and self-hosted deployment options, which allows individuals and organizations to choose the most suitable deployment method based on their requirements. On the other hand, GitKraken primarily focuses on a cloud-based deployment model, offering seamless integration with various cloud platforms.
Collaboration Tools: Bitbucket offers extensive collaboration features like pull requests, inline commenting, and code reviews, allowing teams to collaborate efficiently on code repositories. GitKraken, though it offers some collaboration features, has more limited functionality in this area compared to Bitbucket.
Interface Design: Bitbucket comes with an intuitive and user-friendly interface that is specifically designed for simplicity and ease of use. GitKraken, on the other hand, has a more visually appealing and interactive interface that provides a rich user experience.
Integration Capabilities: Bitbucket offers robust integration capabilities with a wide range of external tools and services like JIRA, Trello, and Jenkins. This seamless integration helps streamline the development and DevOps process. GitKraken also provides integration options, but the number of integrations and the level of depth may not be as extensive as what Bitbucket offers.
Pricing Model: Bitbucket has a flexible pricing model that caters to both individual developers and large organizations. It offers free plans for small teams and affordable paid plans for more advanced features and larger team sizes. GitKraken, while also having a free plan, focuses more on a subscription-based pricing model, which may suit individual developers or small teams less sparsely.
Version Control Support: Both Bitbucket and GitKraken support Git as the primary version control system. However, Bitbucket additionally supports Mercurial, providing users with an alternative option for version control.

In summary, Bitbucket and GitKraken differ in their deployment options, collaboration tools, interface design, integration capabilities, pricing models, and version control support.

Bitbucket vs GitKraken

Overview

Bitbucket vs GitKraken: What are the differences?