Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Bitbucket vs GitKraken: What are the differences?


This Markdown code provides the key differences between Bitbucket and GitKraken. It includes specific differences that highlight the contrasting features and capabilities of both platforms. Markdown code format allows it to be easily used on a website or any other platform.

  1. Deployment Options: Bitbucket provides both cloud-based and self-hosted deployment options, which allows individuals and organizations to choose the most suitable deployment method based on their requirements. On the other hand, GitKraken primarily focuses on a cloud-based deployment model, offering seamless integration with various cloud platforms.

  2. Collaboration Tools: Bitbucket offers extensive collaboration features like pull requests, inline commenting, and code reviews, allowing teams to collaborate efficiently on code repositories. GitKraken, though it offers some collaboration features, has more limited functionality in this area compared to Bitbucket.

  3. Interface Design: Bitbucket comes with an intuitive and user-friendly interface that is specifically designed for simplicity and ease of use. GitKraken, on the other hand, has a more visually appealing and interactive interface that provides a rich user experience.

  4. Integration Capabilities: Bitbucket offers robust integration capabilities with a wide range of external tools and services like JIRA, Trello, and Jenkins. This seamless integration helps streamline the development and DevOps process. GitKraken also provides integration options, but the number of integrations and the level of depth may not be as extensive as what Bitbucket offers.

  5. Pricing Model: Bitbucket has a flexible pricing model that caters to both individual developers and large organizations. It offers free plans for small teams and affordable paid plans for more advanced features and larger team sizes. GitKraken, while also having a free plan, focuses more on a subscription-based pricing model, which may suit individual developers or small teams less sparsely.

  6. Version Control Support: Both Bitbucket and GitKraken support Git as the primary version control system. However, Bitbucket additionally supports Mercurial, providing users with an alternative option for version control.

In summary, Bitbucket and GitKraken differ in their deployment options, collaboration tools, interface design, integration capabilities, pricing models, and version control support.

Decisions about Bitbucket and GitKraken
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Bitbucket
Pros of GitKraken
  • 904
    Free private repos
  • 397
    Simple setup
  • 348
    Nice ui and tools
  • 341
    Unlimited private repositories
  • 240
    Affordable git hosting
  • 123
    Integrates with many apis and services
  • 119
    Reliable uptime
  • 87
    Nice gui
  • 85
    Pull requests and code reviews
  • 58
    Very customisable
  • 16
    Mercurial repositories
  • 14
    SourceTree integration
  • 12
    JIRA integration
  • 10
    Track every commit to an issue in JIRA
  • 8
    Deployment hooks
  • 8
    Best free alternative to Github
  • 7
    Automatically share repositories with all your teammates
  • 7
    Compatible with Mac and Windows
  • 6
    Source Code Insight
  • 6
  • 5
    Login with Google
  • 5
    Create a wiki
  • 5
    Approve pull request button
  • 4
    Customizable pipelines
  • 4
    #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA
  • 3
    Also supports Mercurial
  • 3
    Unlimited Private Repos at no cost
  • 3
    Continuous Integration and Delivery
  • 2
    Academic license program
  • 2
    Multilingual interface
  • 2
  • 2
    Open source friendly
  • 2
    Issues tracker
  • 2
  • 2
    IAM integration
  • 2
    Mercurial Support
  • 59
    Dark theme
  • 34
    Best linux git client
  • 29
    Great overview
  • 21
    Full featured client
  • 20
    Gitflow support
  • 19
    Beautiful UI
  • 18
    Very easy to use
  • 16
  • 13
    Works great on both linux and windows
  • 13
  • 6
    Easy Merge Conflict Tool
  • 5
    Amazing Github and Bitbucket integration
  • 4
    Great UX
  • 3
    Integration with GitHub
  • 3
    Automatic Repo Discovery
  • 3
    Submodule support
  • 3
    Easy to Learn and Setup
  • 3
    Super fast
  • 2
    Fuzzy find (CTRL P)
  • 1
    Very user friendly
  • 1
    Much more stable than source tree
  • 1
    Great for non-dev users
  • 1
    Because it has Linux client
  • 1
    Command palette (CTRL Shift P)

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Bitbucket
Cons of GitKraken
  • 19
    Not much community activity
  • 17
    Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui
  • 15
    Quite buggy
  • 10
    Managed by enterprise Java company
  • 8
    CI tool is not free of charge
  • 7
    Complexity with rights management
  • 6
    Only 5 collaborators for private repos
  • 4
    Slow performance
  • 2
    No AWS Codepipelines integration
  • 1
    No more Mercurial repositories
  • 1
    No server side git-hook support
  • 3
    Extremely slow when working with large repositories
  • 3
    No edit/fixup in interactive rebase
  • 3
    Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)
  • 2
    Not as many features as sourcetree
  • 2
    Do not allow to directly edit staging area
  • 2
    Does not work like a Mac app

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is Bitbucket?

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

What is GitKraken?

The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Bitbucket?
What companies use GitKraken?
See which teams inside your own company are using Bitbucket or GitKraken.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Bitbucket?
What tools integrate with GitKraken?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Mar 4 2020 at 5:14PM


What are some alternatives to Bitbucket and GitKraken?
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
Atlassian Stash
It is a centralized solution to manage Git repositories behind the firewall. Streamlined for small agile teams, powerful enough for large organizations.
It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.
See all alternatives