Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bitbucket vs GitKraken: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides the key differences between Bitbucket and GitKraken. It includes specific differences that highlight the contrasting features and capabilities of both platforms. Markdown code format allows it to be easily used on a website or any other platform.
Deployment Options: Bitbucket provides both cloud-based and self-hosted deployment options, which allows individuals and organizations to choose the most suitable deployment method based on their requirements. On the other hand, GitKraken primarily focuses on a cloud-based deployment model, offering seamless integration with various cloud platforms.
Collaboration Tools: Bitbucket offers extensive collaboration features like pull requests, inline commenting, and code reviews, allowing teams to collaborate efficiently on code repositories. GitKraken, though it offers some collaboration features, has more limited functionality in this area compared to Bitbucket.
Interface Design: Bitbucket comes with an intuitive and user-friendly interface that is specifically designed for simplicity and ease of use. GitKraken, on the other hand, has a more visually appealing and interactive interface that provides a rich user experience.
Integration Capabilities: Bitbucket offers robust integration capabilities with a wide range of external tools and services like JIRA, Trello, and Jenkins. This seamless integration helps streamline the development and DevOps process. GitKraken also provides integration options, but the number of integrations and the level of depth may not be as extensive as what Bitbucket offers.
Pricing Model: Bitbucket has a flexible pricing model that caters to both individual developers and large organizations. It offers free plans for small teams and affordable paid plans for more advanced features and larger team sizes. GitKraken, while also having a free plan, focuses more on a subscription-based pricing model, which may suit individual developers or small teams less sparsely.
Version Control Support: Both Bitbucket and GitKraken support Git as the primary version control system. However, Bitbucket additionally supports Mercurial, providing users with an alternative option for version control.
In summary, Bitbucket and GitKraken differ in their deployment options, collaboration tools, interface design, integration capabilities, pricing models, and version control support.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i
is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos905
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools349
- Unlimited private repositories342
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Source Code Insight7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Mercurial Support2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- Academic license program2
- IAM integration2
Pros of GitKraken
- Dark theme59
- Best linux git client34
- Great overview29
- Full featured client21
- Gitflow support20
- Beautiful UI19
- Very easy to use18
- Graph16
- Works great on both linux and windows13
- Effortless13
- Easy Merge Conflict Tool6
- Amazing Github and Bitbucket integration5
- Great UX4
- Integration with GitHub3
- Automatic Repo Discovery3
- Submodule support3
- Easy to Learn and Setup3
- Super fast3
- Fuzzy find (CTRL P)2
- Very user friendly1
- Much more stable than source tree1
- Great for non-dev users1
- Because it has Linux client1
- Command palette (CTRL Shift P)1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Cons of GitKraken
- Extremely slow when working with large repositories3
- No edit/fixup in interactive rebase3
- Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)3
- Not as many features as sourcetree2
- Do not allow to directly edit staging area2
- Does not work like a Mac app2