Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Eureka vs Git: What are the differences?
What is Eureka? AWS Service registry for resilient mid-tier load balancing and failover. Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.
What is Git? Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system. Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
Eureka can be classified as a tool in the "Open Source Service Discovery" category, while Git is grouped under "Version Control System".
"Easy setup and integration with spring-cloud " is the primary reason why developers consider Eureka over the competitors, whereas "Distributed version control system" was stated as the key factor in picking Git.
Eureka and Git are both open source tools. Git with 28.2K GitHub stars and 16.3K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Eureka with 7.98K GitHub stars and 2.2K GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, Git has a broader approval, being mentioned in 3932 company stacks & 4778 developers stacks; compared to Eureka, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 14 developer stacks.
Pros of Eureka
- Easy setup and integration with spring-cloud21
- Web ui9
- Monitoring8
- Health checking8
- Circuit breaker7
- Netflix battle tested components6
- Service discovery6
- Open Source4
Pros of Git
- Distributed version control system1.4K
- Efficient branching and merging1.1K
- Fast959
- Open source845
- Better than svn726
- Great command-line application368
- Simple306
- Free291
- Easy to use232
- Does not require server222
- Distributed27
- Small & Fast22
- Feature based workflow18
- Staging Area15
- Most wide-spread VSC13
- Role-based codelines11
- Disposable Experimentation11
- Frictionless Context Switching7
- Data Assurance6
- Efficient5
- Just awesome4
- Github integration3
- Easy branching and merging3
- Compatible2
- Flexible2
- Possible to lose history and commits2
- Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing1
- Light1
- Team Integration1
- Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system1
- Easy1
- Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast1
- CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome1
- It's what you do1
- Phinx0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Eureka
Cons of Git
- Hard to learn16
- Inconsistent command line interface11
- Easy to lose uncommitted work9
- Worst documentation ever possibly made7
- Awful merge handling5
- Unexistent preventive security flows3
- Rebase hell3
- When --force is disabled, cannot rebase2
- Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly2
- Doesn't scale for big data1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Eureka?
What is Git?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Eureka?
What tools integrate with Git?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+7
+9
+4
+2
+3
+4
+5
+22