StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Engine Yard Cloud vs HatchBox

Engine Yard Cloud vs HatchBox

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Engine Yard Cloud
Engine Yard Cloud
Stacks25
Followers36
Votes7
HatchBox
HatchBox
Stacks9
Followers10
Votes0

Engine Yard Cloud vs HatchBox: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Engine Yard Cloud and HatchBox are highlighted below:

  1. Deployment System: Engine Yard Cloud provides a sophisticated deployment system with CI, rolling restart, and easy scaling. On the other hand, HatchBox focuses on simplicity with a one-click deployment process, making it ideal for small projects or developers who prioritize ease of use over advanced deployment options.

  2. Monitoring and Metrics: Engine Yard Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring and metrics tools to track system performance and health in real-time. In contrast, HatchBox provides basic monitoring capabilities with simple metrics, suitable for smaller projects that do not require extensive monitoring features.

  3. Pricing Structure: Engine Yard Cloud typically has a higher price point due to its advanced features and capabilities, making it more suitable for enterprise-level applications with larger budgets. In contrast, HatchBox offers a more affordable pricing structure, making it ideal for startups and small businesses looking for a cost-effective deployment solution.

  4. Scalability Options: Engine Yard Cloud offers extensive scalability options, allowing users to easily scale up or down based on demand through auto-scaling and load balancing features. On the other hand, HatchBox provides more limited scalability options, making it better suited for smaller projects with predictable traffic patterns.

  5. Support and Documentation: Engine Yard Cloud provides comprehensive support and documentation resources, including 24/7 technical support and in-depth guides for troubleshooting and optimization. In comparison, HatchBox offers basic support and documentation, suitable for developers who are comfortable troubleshooting issues independently or rely on community forums for assistance.

  6. Customization and Flexibility: Engine Yard Cloud provides a high level of customization and flexibility, allowing users to configure their environments according to specific requirements. In contrast, HatchBox offers a more standardized setup, limiting the degree of customization available to users.

In Summary, the key differences between Engine Yard Cloud and HatchBox lie in their deployment system sophistication, monitoring and metrics tools, pricing structure, scalability options, support and documentation, and customization and flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Engine Yard Cloud
Engine Yard Cloud
HatchBox
HatchBox

The Engine Yard Platform as a Service (PaaS) is a product family that leverages open source technologies to orchestrate and automate the configuration, deployment and management of applications on multiple infrastructures.

Configure any server to run Ruby on Rails servers in minutes and without hassle.

Dedicated, secure, commercial-grade platform that increases agility;Focus on your code - not on operations or platform maintenance;Scale cloud applications and infrastructure rapidly;Control over your environment's configuration;Improved uptime and data reliability;Built-in monitoring and alerts to improve performance
Choose your hosting provider; ActionCable; Automatic Databases; Customizable Nginx; Redis Support; Sidekiq; SSL & Lets Encrypt; Environment Variables; Secure By Default
Statistics
Stacks
25
Stacks
9
Followers
36
Followers
10
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Great customer support
  • 1
    Simple deployment
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Redis To Go
Redis To Go
MongoLab
MongoLab
Cloudability
Cloudability
Loggly
Loggly
IronMQ
IronMQ
Treasure Data
Treasure Data
New Relic
New Relic
Logentries
Logentries
Codeship
Codeship
Rails
Rails
Redis
Redis
Sidekiq
Sidekiq
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Engine Yard Cloud, HatchBox?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase