Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
DigitalOcean vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?
Key Differences between DigitalOcean and Google App Engine
DigitalOcean and Google App Engine are two popular cloud platforms that offer different services for developers and businesses. Below are the key differences between the two:
Infrastructure Management: DigitalOcean provides Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) where developers have more control over the virtual machines and can configure them as per their requirements. On the other hand, Google App Engine is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) that abstracts away the infrastructure management, allowing developers to focus more on application development without worrying about server management.
Scalability and Auto Scaling: One of the key advantages of Google App Engine is its automatic scaling feature. It can dynamically allocate and deallocate resources based on traffic demands, ensuring high availability and efficient resource utilization. DigitalOcean, on the other hand, requires manual scaling where users need to resize their droplets manually to handle increased traffic.
Managed Services: Google App Engine offers a wide range of managed services such as databases, messaging queues, caching, and more that are integrated into the platform. These services are highly available, scalable, and easy to use. In contrast, DigitalOcean provides basic infrastructure services like virtual machines and block storage, but users have to manage the software stack and other services on their own.
Pricing Model: DigitalOcean follows a straightforward pricing model, where users are billed based on the resources they use (droplets, storage, bandwidth, etc.). On the other hand, Google App Engine has a more complex pricing model that takes into account various factors such as number of requests, CPU usage, storage, and networking. It also offers a free tier with certain limitations, making it more cost-effective for small-scale projects.
Flexibility and Control: DigitalOcean offers more flexibility and control as developers have root access to their virtual machines and can customize the server environment according to their needs. Google App Engine, being a PaaS, abstracts away the underlying infrastructure, which limits the level of customization and control available to developers.
Developer Ecosystem: Google App Engine has a mature and robust developer ecosystem, with support for multiple programming languages, extensive documentation, and a rich set of third-party libraries and tools. DigitalOcean also has a strong developer community, but it is more focused on infrastructure-related discussions and tutorials.
In Summary, while DigitalOcean offers more control and flexibility, Google App Engine provides managed services, automatic scaling, and a cost-effective pricing model. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the project and the level of control desired by the developers.
Chose Hetnzer over DigitalOcean and Linode because Hetzner provides much cheaper VPS with much better specs. DigitalOcean might seems like a good choice at first because of how popular it is. But in reality, if all you need is a simple VPS, you won't benefit much from the their oversubscribed datacenters which often underperform other competitors. Linode is also a good choice. They have cheaper options and performs slightly better than DigitalOcean. In the end, choosing a more affordable host helps you save money. That's important when you're running a tight ship.
While Media Temple is more expensive than DigitalOcean, sometimes it is like comparing apples and oranges. DigitalOcean provides what is called Virtual Private Servers ( VPS ). While you seem to be on your own dedicated server, you are, in fact, sharing the same hardware with others.
If you need to be on your own dedicated server, or have other hardware requirements, you do not really have as many options with DigitalOcean. But with Media Temple, the skies the limit ( but so is potentially the cost ).
DigitalOcean was where I began; its USD5/month is extremely competitive and the overall experience as highly user-friendly.
However, their offerings were lacking and integrating with other resources I had on AWS was getting more costly (due to transfer costs on AWS). Eventually I moved the entire project off DO's Droplets and onto AWS's EC2.
One may initially find the cost (w/o free tier) and interface of AWS daunting however with good planning you can achieve highly cost-efficient systems with savings plans, spot instances, etcetera.
Do not dive into AWS head-first! Seriously, don't. Stand back and read pricing documentation thoroughly. You can, not to the fault of AWS, easily go way overbudget. Your first action upon getting your AWS account should be to set up billing alarms for estimated and current bill totals.
Pros of DigitalOcean
- Great value for money560
- Simple dashboard364
- Good pricing362
- Ssds300
- Nice ui250
- Easy configuration191
- Great documentation156
- Ssh access138
- Great community135
- Ubuntu24
- Docker13
- IPv6 support12
- Private networking10
- 99.99% uptime SLA8
- Simple API7
- Great tutorials7
- 55 Second Provisioning6
- One Click Applications5
- Dokku4
- Node.js4
- LAMP4
- Debian4
- CoreOS4
- 1Gb/sec Servers3
- Word Press3
- LEMP3
- Simple Control Panel3
- Mean3
- Ghost3
- Runs CoreOS2
- Quick and no nonsense service2
- Django2
- Good Tutorials2
- Speed2
- Ruby on Rails2
- GitLab2
- Hex Core machines with dedicated ECC Ram and RAID SSD s2
- CentOS1
- Spaces1
- KVM Virtualization1
- Amazing Hardware1
- Transfer Globally1
- Fedora1
- FreeBSD1
- Drupal1
- FreeBSD Amp1
- Magento1
- ownCloud1
- RedMine1
- My go to server provider1
- Ease and simplicity1
- Nice1
- Find it superfitting with my requirements (SSD, ssh.1
- Easy Setup1
- Cheap1
- Static IP1
- It's the easiest to get started for small projects1
- Automatic Backup1
- Great support1
- Quick and easy to set up1
- Servers on demand - literally1
- Reliability1
- Variety of services0
- Managed Kubernetes0
Pros of Google App Engine
- Easy to deploy145
- Auto scaling106
- Good free plan80
- Easy management62
- Scalability56
- Low cost35
- Comprehensive set of features32
- All services in one place28
- Simple scaling22
- Quick and reliable cloud servers19
- Granular Billing6
- Easy to develop and unit test5
- Monitoring gives comprehensive set of key indicators4
- Really easy to quickly bring up a full stack3
- Create APIs quickly with cloud endpoints3
- Mostly up2
- No Ops2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of DigitalOcean
- No live support chat3
- Pricing3