Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

DigitalOcean

17.7K
13K
+ 1
2.6K
Google App Engine

10K
7.8K
+ 1
610
Add tool

DigitalOcean vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Key Differences between DigitalOcean and Google App Engine

DigitalOcean and Google App Engine are two popular cloud platforms that offer different services for developers and businesses. Below are the key differences between the two:

  1. Infrastructure Management: DigitalOcean provides Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) where developers have more control over the virtual machines and can configure them as per their requirements. On the other hand, Google App Engine is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) that abstracts away the infrastructure management, allowing developers to focus more on application development without worrying about server management.

  2. Scalability and Auto Scaling: One of the key advantages of Google App Engine is its automatic scaling feature. It can dynamically allocate and deallocate resources based on traffic demands, ensuring high availability and efficient resource utilization. DigitalOcean, on the other hand, requires manual scaling where users need to resize their droplets manually to handle increased traffic.

  3. Managed Services: Google App Engine offers a wide range of managed services such as databases, messaging queues, caching, and more that are integrated into the platform. These services are highly available, scalable, and easy to use. In contrast, DigitalOcean provides basic infrastructure services like virtual machines and block storage, but users have to manage the software stack and other services on their own.

  4. Pricing Model: DigitalOcean follows a straightforward pricing model, where users are billed based on the resources they use (droplets, storage, bandwidth, etc.). On the other hand, Google App Engine has a more complex pricing model that takes into account various factors such as number of requests, CPU usage, storage, and networking. It also offers a free tier with certain limitations, making it more cost-effective for small-scale projects.

  5. Flexibility and Control: DigitalOcean offers more flexibility and control as developers have root access to their virtual machines and can customize the server environment according to their needs. Google App Engine, being a PaaS, abstracts away the underlying infrastructure, which limits the level of customization and control available to developers.

  6. Developer Ecosystem: Google App Engine has a mature and robust developer ecosystem, with support for multiple programming languages, extensive documentation, and a rich set of third-party libraries and tools. DigitalOcean also has a strong developer community, but it is more focused on infrastructure-related discussions and tutorials.

In Summary, while DigitalOcean offers more control and flexibility, Google App Engine provides managed services, automatic scaling, and a cost-effective pricing model. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the project and the level of control desired by the developers.

Decisions about DigitalOcean and Google App Engine

Chose Hetnzer over DigitalOcean and Linode because Hetzner provides much cheaper VPS with much better specs. DigitalOcean might seems like a good choice at first because of how popular it is. But in reality, if all you need is a simple VPS, you won't benefit much from the their oversubscribed datacenters which often underperform other competitors. Linode is also a good choice. They have cheaper options and performs slightly better than DigitalOcean. In the end, choosing a more affordable host helps you save money. That's important when you're running a tight ship.

See more
Peter Schmalfeldt
Senior Software Engineer · | 3 upvotes · 61.1K views

While Media Temple is more expensive than DigitalOcean, sometimes it is like comparing apples and oranges. DigitalOcean provides what is called Virtual Private Servers ( VPS ). While you seem to be on your own dedicated server, you are, in fact, sharing the same hardware with others.

If you need to be on your own dedicated server, or have other hardware requirements, you do not really have as many options with DigitalOcean. But with Media Temple, the skies the limit ( but so is potentially the cost ).

See more
Jerome/Zen Quah
Shared insights
on
Amazon EC2Amazon EC2DigitalOceanDigitalOcean

DigitalOcean was where I began; its USD5/month is extremely competitive and the overall experience as highly user-friendly.

However, their offerings were lacking and integrating with other resources I had on AWS was getting more costly (due to transfer costs on AWS). Eventually I moved the entire project off DO's Droplets and onto AWS's EC2.

One may initially find the cost (w/o free tier) and interface of AWS daunting however with good planning you can achieve highly cost-efficient systems with savings plans, spot instances, etcetera.

Do not dive into AWS head-first! Seriously, don't. Stand back and read pricing documentation thoroughly. You can, not to the fault of AWS, easily go way overbudget. Your first action upon getting your AWS account should be to set up billing alarms for estimated and current bill totals.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of DigitalOcean
Pros of Google App Engine
  • 560
    Great value for money
  • 364
    Simple dashboard
  • 362
    Good pricing
  • 300
    Ssds
  • 250
    Nice ui
  • 191
    Easy configuration
  • 156
    Great documentation
  • 138
    Ssh access
  • 135
    Great community
  • 24
    Ubuntu
  • 13
    Docker
  • 12
    IPv6 support
  • 10
    Private networking
  • 8
    99.99% uptime SLA
  • 7
    Simple API
  • 7
    Great tutorials
  • 6
    55 Second Provisioning
  • 5
    One Click Applications
  • 4
    Dokku
  • 4
    Node.js
  • 4
    LAMP
  • 4
    Debian
  • 4
    CoreOS
  • 3
    1Gb/sec Servers
  • 3
    Word Press
  • 3
    LEMP
  • 3
    Simple Control Panel
  • 3
    Mean
  • 3
    Ghost
  • 2
    Runs CoreOS
  • 2
    Quick and no nonsense service
  • 2
    Django
  • 2
    Good Tutorials
  • 2
    Speed
  • 2
    Ruby on Rails
  • 2
    GitLab
  • 2
    Hex Core machines with dedicated ECC Ram and RAID SSD s
  • 1
    CentOS
  • 1
    Spaces
  • 1
    KVM Virtualization
  • 1
    Amazing Hardware
  • 1
    Transfer Globally
  • 1
    Fedora
  • 1
    FreeBSD
  • 1
    Drupal
  • 1
    FreeBSD Amp
  • 1
    Magento
  • 1
    ownCloud
  • 1
    RedMine
  • 1
    My go to server provider
  • 1
    Ease and simplicity
  • 1
    Nice
  • 1
    Find it superfitting with my requirements (SSD, ssh.
  • 1
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    Cheap
  • 1
    Static IP
  • 1
    It's the easiest to get started for small projects
  • 1
    Automatic Backup
  • 1
    Great support
  • 1
    Quick and easy to set up
  • 1
    Servers on demand - literally
  • 1
    Reliability
  • 0
    Variety of services
  • 0
    Managed Kubernetes
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
  • 35
    Low cost
  • 32
    Comprehensive set of features
  • 28
    All services in one place
  • 22
    Simple scaling
  • 19
    Quick and reliable cloud servers
  • 6
    Granular Billing
  • 5
    Easy to develop and unit test
  • 4
    Monitoring gives comprehensive set of key indicators
  • 3
    Really easy to quickly bring up a full stack
  • 3
    Create APIs quickly with cloud endpoints
  • 2
    Mostly up
  • 2
    No Ops

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of DigitalOcean
Cons of Google App Engine
  • 3
    No live support chat
  • 3
    Pricing
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is DigitalOcean?

    We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.

    What is Google App Engine?

    Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use DigitalOcean?
    What companies use Google App Engine?
    See which teams inside your own company are using DigitalOcean or Google App Engine.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with DigitalOcean?
    What tools integrate with Google App Engine?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

    DigitalOcean

    GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
    2
    2356
    What are some alternatives to DigitalOcean and Google App Engine?
    Linode
    Get a server running in minutes with your choice of Linux distro, resources, and node location.
    Vultr
    Strategically located in 16 datacenters around the globe and provides frictionless provisioning of public cloud, storage and single-tenant bare metal.
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    Microsoft Azure
    Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.
    Bitnami
    Our library provides trusted virtual machines for every major development stack and open source server application, ready to run in your infrastructure.
    See all alternatives