Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AppDynamics vs OverOps: What are the differences?
Introduction
When comparing AppDynamics and OverOps, it is essential to understand the key differences between these two monitoring tools to determine which one best suits your needs.
Technology Focus: AppDynamics primarily focuses on application performance monitoring with features like code-level visibility, performance metrics, and real-time anomaly detection. On the other hand, OverOps specializes in code quality and reliability by providing insights into the quality of code, highlighting issues like errors, exceptions, and bugs in production environments.
Root Cause Analysis: AppDynamics offers root cause analysis by tracking application performance metrics and generating alerts based on predefined thresholds. In contrast, OverOps excels in root cause analysis by pinpointing the exact line of code responsible for errors or exceptions, making it easier for developers to fix issues quickly.
Deployment Model: AppDynamics is mainly a cloud-based solution, offering both SaaS and on-premises options for monitoring applications. OverOps, on the other hand, is typically deployed on-premises, providing a comprehensive view of code quality within the organization's infrastructure.
Integration Capabilities: AppDynamics offers integrations with various tools, such as service desk systems, CI/CD pipelines, and cloud platforms, to streamline the monitoring and troubleshooting processes. OverOps integrates seamlessly with popular software development tools like Jira and Git, enabling developers to prioritize and resolve code quality issues efficiently.
Target Users: AppDynamics is designed for IT operations teams and DevOps professionals who need to monitor application performance and ensure reliable service delivery. OverOps caters more to developers and quality assurance teams looking to improve code quality and prevent errors from impacting end-users.
Scalability: AppDynamics is well-suited for large enterprises and complex IT environments due to its scalability, which allows for monitoring a vast number of applications and services. OverOps, on the other hand, is particularly beneficial for organizations focused on maintaining code quality and reliability, regardless of the scale of their infrastructure.
In Summary, a critical distinction between AppDynamics and OverOps lies in their technology focus, root cause analysis capabilities, deployment models, integration options, target user base, and scalability to meet diverse monitoring and quality assurance needs.
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
Hi Folks,
I am trying to evaluate Site24x7 against AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic. Has anyone used Site24X7? If so, what are your opinions on the tool? I know that the license costs are very low compared to other tools in the market. Other than that, are there any major issues anyone has encountered using the tool itself?
what are the most important things you are looking for the tools to do? each has their strong points... are you looking to monitor new tech like containers, k8s, and microservices?
Pros of AppDynamics
- Deep code visibility21
- Powerful13
- Real-Time Visibility8
- Great visualization7
- Easy Setup6
- Comprehensive Coverage of Programming Languages6
- Deep DB Troubleshooting4
- Excellent Customer Support3
Pros of OverOps
- In-depth error analysis with variable values in product8
- All the info you need to solve bugs without logs5
- OverOps reveals the unknown4
- Jira & Github integration4
- Scala support3
- A lot of context added to otherwise plain information3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AppDynamics
- Expensive5
- Poor to non-existent integration with aws services2