Alternatives to Pusher logo

Alternatives to Pusher

PubNub, SignalR, Firebase, Chat by Stream, and Twilio are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Pusher.
514
1.2K
+ 1
233

What is Pusher and what are its top alternatives?

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.
Pusher is a tool in the Realtime Backend / API category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Pusher

  • PubNub

    PubNub

    PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server. ...

  • SignalR

    SignalR

    SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization. ...

  • Firebase

    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • Chat by Stream

    Chat by Stream

    Chat API and SDK. With a beautiful UI Kit, easy to use React Components and powerful API. Add Chat to any application in a matter of hours. The tech uses Go, RocksDB and Raft. By the creators of Stream, the API that powers activity feeds for more than 300 million users. ...

  • Twilio

    Twilio

    Twilio offers developers a powerful API for phone services to make and receive phone calls, and send and receive text messages. Their product allows programmers to more easily integrate various communication methods into their software and programs. ...

  • Socket.IO

    Socket.IO

    It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed. ...

  • Google Cloud Pub/Sub

    Google Cloud Pub/Sub

    Cloud Pub/Sub is a fully-managed real-time messaging service that allows you to send and receive messages between independent applications. You can leverage Cloud Pub/Sub’s flexibility to decouple systems and components hosted on Google Cloud Platform or elsewhere on the Internet. ...

  • NATS

    NATS

    Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems. ...

Pusher alternatives & related posts

PubNub logo

PubNub

172
402
237
Build real-time apps quickly and scale them globally.
172
402
+ 1
237
PROS OF PUBNUB
  • 35
    Massively scalable & easy to use
  • 25
    Easy setup
  • 20
    Reliable
  • 19
    Great support
  • 14
    Flexible to integrate to custom applications
  • 13
    Sockets at Scale
  • 13
    High-Performance
  • 13
    99.999% availability guarantees
  • 12
    Multiplexing
  • 12
    High-Reliability
  • 7
    Scalability
  • 5
    70+ SDKs
  • 5
    High-Availability
  • 4
    Security
  • 4
    Azure Add-on
  • 3
    Heroku Add-on
  • 3
    Easy to setup
  • 3
    Flexible
  • 3
    Presence
  • 2
    Analytics
  • 2
    Free Plan
  • 2
    Server-Side Cache
  • 2
    PhoneGap Plugin
  • 2
    AngularJS Adapter
  • 2
    Data Sync
  • 2
    Data Streams
  • 2
    Support
  • 1
    Easy setup and very reliable
  • 1
    High cost, going up more in Summer '15
  • 1
    Cool
  • 1
    Angular 2+ integration
  • 1
    Documentation, easy to use, great people/service
  • 1
    CTO stephen also is A++++++
  • 1
    Real time and easy to use.
  • 1
    Easy integration with iOS apps
CONS OF PUBNUB
  • 1
    Costly

related PubNub posts

Which messaging service (Pusher vs. PubNub vs. Google Cloud Pub/Sub) to use for IoT?

See more
Shared insights
on
PubNubPubNubSocket.IOSocket.IO

I am trying to replace Socket.IO with PubNub. Provide the way to do it.

See more
SignalR logo

SignalR

389
1K
109
A new library for ASP.NET developers that makes developing real-time web functionality easy.
389
1K
+ 1
109
PROS OF SIGNALR
  • 26
    Supports .NET server
  • 17
    Real-time
  • 13
    Free
  • 13
    Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
  • 12
    WebSockets
  • 7
    Simple
  • 7
    JSON
  • 6
    Open source
  • 4
    Ease of use
  • 4
    Cool
CONS OF SIGNALR
  • 2
    Requires jQuery
  • 2
    Expertise hard to get
  • 1
    Weak iOS and Android support
  • 1
    Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions

related SignalR posts

Shared insights
on
gRPCgRPCSignalRSignalR.NET.NET

We need to interact from several different Web applications (remote) to a client-side application (.exe in .NET Framework, Windows.Console under our controlled environment). From the web applications, we need to send and receive data and invoke methods to client-side .exe on javascript events like users onclick. SignalR is one of the .Net alternatives to do that, but it adds overhead for what we need. Is it better to add SignalR at both client-side application and remote web application, or use gRPC as it sounds lightest and is multilingual?

SignalR or gRPC are always sending and receiving data on the client-side (from browser to .exe and back to browser). And web application is used for graphical visualization of data to the user. There is no need for local .exe to send or interact with remote web API. Which architecture or framework do you suggest to use in this case?

See more
Firebase logo

Firebase

29K
24.8K
1.9K
The Realtime App Platform
29K
24.8K
+ 1
1.9K
PROS OF FIREBASE
  • 364
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 267
    Fast and responsive
  • 236
    Easy setup
  • 211
    Real-time
  • 188
    JSON
  • 132
    Free
  • 124
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 66
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 29
    Great documentation
  • 24
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 18
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Chat
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 5
    Firebase hosting
  • 5
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 1
    .net
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Free hosting
  • 1
    Cloud functions
CONS OF FIREBASE
  • 29
    Can become expensive
  • 15
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 5
    Cant filter queries
  • 3
    Very unstable server
  • 2
    No Relational Data
  • 2
    Too many errors
  • 2
    No offline sync

related Firebase posts

Stephen Gheysens
Senior Solutions Engineer at Twilio · | 14 upvotes · 433.3K views

Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

See more
Tassanai Singprom

This is my stack in Application & Data

JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

My Utilities Tools

Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

My Devops Tools

Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

My Business Tools

Slack

See more
Chat by Stream logo

Chat by Stream

11
46
95
Chat API & SDK
11
46
+ 1
95
PROS OF CHAT BY STREAM
  • 15
    Reasonable Pricing
  • 14
    Threads
  • 13
    Very fast and scalable
  • 13
    SDKs for React, RN, Android and iOS are better
  • 13
    Reactions
  • 10
    Front-End Components
  • 9
    Great support
  • 4
    Stability
  • 4
    Performance
CONS OF CHAT BY STREAM
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Chat by Stream posts

    Twilio logo

    Twilio

    7.9K
    6K
    517
    Bring voice and messaging to your web and mobile applications.
    7.9K
    6K
    + 1
    517
    PROS OF TWILIO
    • 146
      Powerful, simple, and well documented api
    • 87
      RESTful API
    • 66
      Clear pricing
    • 61
      Great sms services
    • 58
      Low cost of entry
    • 29
      Global SMS Gateway
    • 14
      Good value
    • 12
      Cloud IVR
    • 11
      Simple
    • 11
      Extremely simple to integrate with rails
    • 6
      Great for startups
    • 4
      SMS
    • 3
      Hassle free
    • 3
      Great developer program
    • 2
      Text me the app pages
    • 1
      New Features constantly rolling out
    • 1
      Many deployment options, from build from scratch to buy
    • 1
      Easy integration
    • 1
      Two factor authentication
    • 0
      A
    CONS OF TWILIO
    • 2
      Predictable pricing
    • 1
      Expensive

    related Twilio posts

    Hi, Stackshare community, I plan to build an app where people can go live, and users can watch him, 1 to many, follow each other, and text.

    I am expecting a huge number of users to use the app in the first month (100k+)

    I made the UX/UI design, and my designer asked me to find a developer.

    I want your advice. What server is the best for video quality and fast text messages (like uplive, bigo)?

    Ex. Agora, Twilio, Amazon Chime, Aws, or fiberbass

    I need for both operating systems, (ios, android). Do you recommend Flutter?

    • I have AWS server in my country (Bahrain), and 80% of the audience are from the same area. Does it help in the video quality between the audience?

    Thank you for this helpful website.

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    AgoraAgoraTwilioTwilioFirebaseFirebase

    Hello,

    My app will be a live streaming app (like tango, BigoLive) An app developer asked me to choose a tech stack and a team. expected auditions from (Bahrain-KSA-UAE-Kuwait-Oman)

    200 (broadcaster) at a time (minimum) (for 12 hours a day);10K watching the 200 (like 50 to 500) each live.

    What servers are the best to use and give smooth high quality like Bigolive? For live streaming, and texting, and everything.

    Which one is the best combination for my app? (Firebase, AWS, Twilio. Agora)

    Thanks

    See more
    Socket.IO logo

    Socket.IO

    9.3K
    7.8K
    777
    Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)
    9.3K
    7.8K
    + 1
    777
    PROS OF SOCKET.IO
    • 214
      Real-time
    • 143
      Event-based communication
    • 142
      Node.js
    • 102
      Open source
    • 102
      WebSockets
    • 26
      Binary streaming
    • 22
      No internet dependency
    • 9
      Fallback to polling if WebSockets not supported
    • 8
      Large community
    • 5
      Ease of access and setup
    • 4
      Push notification
    CONS OF SOCKET.IO
    • 11
      Bad documentation
    • 4
      Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
    • 3
      Doesn't work on React Native
    • 2
      Websocket Errors
    • 2
      Small community

    related Socket.IO posts

    across_the_grid
    Full-stack web developer · | 10 upvotes · 342.5K views
    Shared insights
    on
    Socket.IOSocket.IONode.jsNode.jsExpressJSExpressJS

    I use Socket.IO because the application has 2 frontend clients, which need to communicate in real-time. The backend-server handles the communication between these two clients via websockets. Socket.io is very easy to set up in Node.js and ExpressJS.

    In the research project, the 1st client shows panoramic videos in a so called cave system (it is the VR setup of our research lab, which consists of three big screens, which are specially arranged, so the user experience the videos more immersive), the 2nd client controls the videos/locations of the 1st client.

    See more

    We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

    See more
    Google Cloud Pub/Sub logo

    Google Cloud Pub/Sub

    413
    349
    12
    Global service for real-time and reliable messaging and streaming data
    413
    349
    + 1
    12
    PROS OF GOOGLE CLOUD PUB/SUB
    • 7
      Easy to set-up and start with
    • 2
      Https://github.com/googleapis/nodejs-pubsub
    • 1
      A great choice for microservice architecture
    • 1
      FYI it has a github repo. please add it
    • 1
      Efficient and practical for complex systems
    CONS OF GOOGLE CLOUD PUB/SUB
    • 2
      Need integration with stackdriver for monitoring

    related Google Cloud Pub/Sub posts

    Which messaging service (Pusher vs. PubNub vs. Google Cloud Pub/Sub) to use for IoT?

    See more
    NATS logo

    NATS

    235
    378
    51
    Lightweight publish-subscribe & distributed queueing messaging system
    235
    378
    + 1
    51
    PROS OF NATS
    • 20
      Fastest pub-sub system out there
    • 14
      Rock solid
    • 10
      Easy to grasp
    • 3
      Light-weight
    • 3
      Easy, Fast, Secure
    • 1
      Robust Security Model
    CONS OF NATS
    • 1
      No Order
    • 1
      Persistence with Jetstream supported
    • 1
      No Persistence

    related NATS posts

    Reza Saadat
    IoT Solutions Architect at GreenEdge · | 5 upvotes · 7.1K views
    Shared insights
    on
    MQTTMQTTNATSNATS

    I want to use NATS for my IoT Platform and replace it instead of the MQTT broker. is there any preferred added value to do that?

    See more