Alternatives to PubNub logo

Alternatives to PubNub

Pusher, Socket.IO, SendBird, Stream, and Kafka are the most popular alternatives and competitors to PubNub.
179
393
+ 1
237

What is PubNub and what are its top alternatives?

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.
PubNub is a tool in the Realtime Backend / API category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to PubNub

  • Pusher

    Pusher

    Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features. ...

  • Socket.IO

    Socket.IO

    It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed. ...

  • SendBird

    SendBird

    SendBird is a Messaging SDK, Chat API, and fully managed chat infrastructure for your mobile apps and websites. Embeddable chat for iOS, Android, JavaScript, Unity, .NET. ...

  • Stream

    Stream

    Stream allows you to build scalable feeds, activity streams, and chat. Stream’s simple, yet powerful API’s and SDKs are used by some of the largest and most popular applications for feeds and chat. SDKs available for most popular languages. ...

  • Kafka

    Kafka

    Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design. ...

  • Ably

    Ably

    Ably is an enterprise-ready pub/sub messaging platform. We make it easy to efficiently design, quickly ship, and seamlessly scale critical realtime functionality delivered directly to end-users. ...

  • Firebase

    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • Twilio

    Twilio

    Twilio offers developers a powerful API for phone services to make and receive phone calls, and send and receive text messages. Their product allows programmers to more easily integrate various communication methods into their software and programs. ...

PubNub alternatives & related posts

Pusher logo

Pusher

526
1.2K
233
Hosted APIs to build realtime apps with less code
526
1.2K
+ 1
233
PROS OF PUSHER
  • 54
    An easy way to give customers realtime features
  • 40
    Websockets
  • 35
    Simple
  • 27
    Easy to get started with
  • 25
    Free plan
  • 12
    Heroku Add-on
  • 11
    Easy and fast to configure and to understand
  • 9
    JSON
  • 6
    Azure Add-on
  • 5
    Support
  • 5
    Happy
  • 4
    Push notification
CONS OF PUSHER
  • 9
    Costly
  • 0
    Aa

related Pusher posts

Which messaging service (Pusher vs. PubNub vs. Google Cloud Pub/Sub) to use for IoT?

See more
Kirill Shirinkin
Cloud and DevOps Consultant at mkdev · | 3 upvotes · 233.5K views
Shared insights
on
Mattermost
Pusher
Twilio
at

Recently we finished long research on chat tool for our students and mentors. In the end we picked Mattermost Team Edition as the cheapest and most feature complete option. We did consider building everything from scratch and use something like Pusher or Twilio on a backend, but then we would have to implement all the desktop and mobile clients and all the features oursevles. Mattermost gave us flexible API, lots of built in or easy to install integrations and future-proof feature set. We are still integrating it with our main platform but so far the team, existing mentors and students are very happy.

See more
Socket.IO logo

Socket.IO

8.9K
7.3K
774
Realtime application framework (Node.JS server)
8.9K
7.3K
+ 1
774
PROS OF SOCKET.IO
  • 213
    Real-time
  • 143
    Event-based communication
  • 141
    Node.js
  • 102
    Open source
  • 101
    WebSockets
  • 26
    Binary streaming
  • 22
    No internet dependency
  • 9
    Fallback to polling if WebSockets not supported
  • 8
    Large community
  • 5
    Ease of access and setup
  • 4
    Push notification
CONS OF SOCKET.IO
  • 11
    Bad documentation
  • 4
    Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
  • 3
    Doesn't work on React Native
  • 2
    Websocket Errors
  • 2
    Small community

related Socket.IO posts

across_the_grid
Full-stack web developer · | 10 upvotes · 334.9K views
Shared insights
on
Socket.IO
Node.js
ExpressJS

I use Socket.IO because the application has 2 frontend clients, which need to communicate in real-time. The backend-server handles the communication between these two clients via websockets. Socket.io is very easy to set up in Node.js and ExpressJS.

In the research project, the 1st client shows panoramic videos in a so called cave system (it is the VR setup of our research lab, which consists of three big screens, which are specially arranged, so the user experience the videos more immersive), the 2nd client controls the videos/locations of the 1st client.

See more

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
SendBird logo

SendBird

101
314
77
A Complete Chat Platform, Messaging and Chat SDK and API
101
314
+ 1
77
PROS OF SENDBIRD
  • 13
    Active support is impressive. (Support for private deve
  • 10
    Easy to use
  • 9
    Pre-built UI for major platforms
  • 8
    Migration API for customers using other chat services
  • 7
    First chat SDK officially supports Xamarin
  • 7
    Scalability is awesome
  • 5
    Cool product
  • 5
    Because my product guy told me to
  • 5
    Unlimited number of users in public chat
  • 4
    Flexible message format ex) json, xml
  • 2
    Out of the box api and features
  • 2
    Intuitive and feature-packed
CONS OF SENDBIRD
  • 2
    Policy on concurrent users leads to overages and overch
  • 2
    Prices ramp up exponentially

related SendBird posts

Yeongju Park
SW Web Engineer at Sense Korea · | 4 upvotes · 16.6K views
Shared insights
on
MSSQL
SendBird
CometChat

I am considering which chat solution to choose between CometChat and SendBird, for our new app. The condition is, the app is going to run in a private network and has to connect with MSSQL. Any advice on other things I have to consider before choosing one, or is there another chat service you would recommend? Thank you!

See more
Stream logo

Stream

155
191
54
Build scalable feeds, activity streams & chat in a few hours instead of months.
155
191
+ 1
54
PROS OF STREAM
  • 18
    Integrates via easy-to-use REST API
  • 18
    Up and running in few minutes
  • 18
    It's easy to setup with the minimum coding
CONS OF STREAM
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Stream posts

    Kafka logo

    Kafka

    15.3K
    14.4K
    562
    Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system
    15.3K
    14.4K
    + 1
    562
    PROS OF KAFKA
    • 120
      High-throughput
    • 114
      Distributed
    • 86
      Scalable
    • 79
      High-Performance
    • 64
      Durable
    • 35
      Publish-Subscribe
    • 18
      Simple-to-use
    • 14
      Open source
    • 10
      Written in Scala and java. Runs on JVM
    • 6
      Message broker + Streaming system
    • 4
      Avro schema integration
    • 2
      Suport Multiple clients
    • 2
      Robust
    • 2
      KSQL
    • 2
      Partioned, replayable log
    • 1
      Fun
    • 1
      Extremely good parallelism constructs
    • 1
      Simple publisher / multi-subscriber model
    • 1
      Flexible
    CONS OF KAFKA
    • 27
      Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
    • 26
      Needs Zookeeper
    • 7
      Operational difficulties
    • 2
      Terrible Packaging

    related Kafka posts

    Eric Colson
    Chief Algorithms Officer at Stitch Fix · | 21 upvotes · 2M views

    The algorithms and data infrastructure at Stitch Fix is housed in #AWS. Data acquisition is split between events flowing through Kafka, and periodic snapshots of PostgreSQL DBs. We store data in an Amazon S3 based data warehouse. Apache Spark on Yarn is our tool of choice for data movement and #ETL. Because our storage layer (s3) is decoupled from our processing layer, we are able to scale our compute environment very elastically. We have several semi-permanent, autoscaling Yarn clusters running to serve our data processing needs. While the bulk of our compute infrastructure is dedicated to algorithmic processing, we also implemented Presto for adhoc queries and dashboards.

    Beyond data movement and ETL, most #ML centric jobs (e.g. model training and execution) run in a similarly elastic environment as containers running Python and R code on Amazon EC2 Container Service clusters. The execution of batch jobs on top of ECS is managed by Flotilla, a service we built in house and open sourced (see https://github.com/stitchfix/flotilla-os).

    At Stitch Fix, algorithmic integrations are pervasive across the business. We have dozens of data products actively integrated systems. That requires serving layer that is robust, agile, flexible, and allows for self-service. Models produced on Flotilla are packaged for deployment in production using Khan, another framework we've developed internally. Khan provides our data scientists the ability to quickly productionize those models they've developed with open source frameworks in Python 3 (e.g. PyTorch, sklearn), by automatically packaging them as Docker containers and deploying to Amazon ECS. This provides our data scientist a one-click method of getting from their algorithms to production. We then integrate those deployments into a service mesh, which allows us to A/B test various implementations in our product.

    For more info:

    #DataScience #DataStack #Data

    See more
    John Kodumal

    As we've evolved or added additional infrastructure to our stack, we've biased towards managed services. Most new backing stores are Amazon RDS instances now. We do use self-managed PostgreSQL with TimescaleDB for time-series data—this is made HA with the use of Patroni and Consul.

    We also use managed Amazon ElastiCache instances instead of spinning up Amazon EC2 instances to run Redis workloads, as well as shifting to Amazon Kinesis instead of Kafka.

    See more
    Ably logo

    Ably

    38
    58
    53
    Ably provides serious cloud infrastructure and APIs to build dependable realtime apps at scale
    38
    58
    + 1
    53
    PROS OF ABLY
    • 5
      Highly reliable
    • 5
      WebSockets
    • 4
      SSE
    • 4
      Channel History
    • 4
      Massive scalability
    • 4
      Great technical support
    • 4
      Message queueing
    • 4
      Global cloud network of data centers
    • 4
      Channel Presence
    • 3
      Free plan
    • 3
      WebHooks
    • 3
      Consistently high performance
    • 3
      Third-party cloud integrations
    • 3
      MQTT
    CONS OF ABLY
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Ably posts

      Firebase logo

      Firebase

      27.4K
      23.1K
      1.9K
      The Realtime App Platform
      27.4K
      23.1K
      + 1
      1.9K
      PROS OF FIREBASE
      • 361
        Realtime backend made easy
      • 264
        Fast and responsive
      • 234
        Easy setup
      • 207
        Real-time
      • 186
        JSON
      • 127
        Free
      • 121
        Backed by google
      • 81
        Angular adaptor
      • 63
        Reliable
      • 36
        Great customer support
      • 26
        Great documentation
      • 23
        Real-time synchronization
      • 20
        Mobile friendly
      • 17
        Rapid prototyping
      • 12
        Great security
      • 11
        Automatic scaling
      • 10
        Freakingly awesome
      • 8
        Chat
      • 8
        Angularfire is an amazing addition!
      • 8
        Super fast development
      • 6
        Awesome next-gen backend
      • 6
        Ios adaptor
      • 5
        Built in user auth/oauth
      • 5
        Firebase hosting
      • 4
        Speed of light
      • 4
        Very easy to use
      • 3
        It's made development super fast
      • 3
        Great
      • 3
        Brilliant for startups
      • 2
        Great all-round functionality
      • 2
        Low battery consumption
      • 2
        I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
      • 2
        The concurrent updates create a great experience
      • 2
        JS Offline and Sync suport
      • 1
        Faster workflow
      • 1
        Large
      • 1
        Serverless
      • 1
        .net
      • 1
        Free SSL
      • 1
        Good Free Limits
      • 1
        Push notification
      • 1
        Easy to use
      • 1
        Easy Reactjs integration
      CONS OF FIREBASE
      • 28
        Can become expensive
      • 15
        Scalability is not infinite
      • 14
        No open source, you depend on external company
      • 9
        Not Flexible Enough
      • 5
        Cant filter queries
      • 3
        Very unstable server
      • 2
        Too many errors
      • 2
        No Relational Data

      related Firebase posts

      Stephen Gheysens
      Senior Solutions Engineer at Twilio · | 14 upvotes · 306.1K views

      Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

      My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

      See more
      Tassanai Singprom

      This is my stack in Application & Data

      JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

      My Utilities Tools

      Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

      My Devops Tools

      Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

      My Business Tools

      Slack

      See more
      Twilio logo

      Twilio

      7.5K
      5.6K
      516
      Bring voice and messaging to your web and mobile applications.
      7.5K
      5.6K
      + 1
      516
      PROS OF TWILIO
      • 146
        Powerful, simple, and well documented api
      • 87
        RESTful API
      • 66
        Clear pricing
      • 61
        Great sms services
      • 58
        Low cost of entry
      • 29
        Global SMS Gateway
      • 14
        Good value
      • 12
        Cloud IVR
      • 11
        Simple
      • 11
        Extremely simple to integrate with rails
      • 6
        Great for startups
      • 4
        SMS
      • 3
        Great developer program
      • 3
        Hassle free
      • 1
        New Features constantly rolling out
      • 1
        Many deployment options, from build from scratch to buy
      • 1
        Text me the app pages
      • 1
        Easy integration
      • 1
        Two factor authentication
      • 0
        A
      CONS OF TWILIO
      • 2
        Predictable pricing
      • 1
        Expensive

      related Twilio posts

      Hi, Stackshare community, I plan to build an app where people can go live, and users can watch him, 1 to many, follow each other, and text.

      I am expecting a huge number of users to use the app in the first month (100k+)

      I made the UX/UI design, and my designer asked me to find a developer.

      I want your advice. What server is the best for video quality and fast text messages (like uplive, bigo)?

      Ex. Agora, Twilio, Amazon Chime, Aws, or fiberbass

      I need for both operating systems, (ios, android). Do you recommend Flutter?

      • I have AWS server in my country (Bahrain), and 80% of the audience are from the same area. Does it help in the video quality between the audience?

      Thank you for this helpful website.

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      Agora
      Twilio
      Firebase

      Hello,

      My app will be a live streaming app (like tango, BigoLive) An app developer asked me to choose a tech stack and a team. expected auditions from (Bahrain-KSA-UAE-Kuwait-Oman)

      200 (broadcaster) at a time (minimum) (for 12 hours a day);10K watching the 200 (like 50 to 500) each live.

      What servers are the best to use and give smooth high quality like Bigolive? For live streaming, and texting, and everything.

      Which one is the best combination for my app? (Firebase, AWS, Twilio. Agora)

      Thanks

      See more