Alternatives to Google Compute Engine logo

Alternatives to Google Compute Engine

Google App Engine, DigitalOcean, Google Cloud Platform, Amazon EC2, and Microsoft Azure are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Google Compute Engine.
12K
9K
+ 1
422

What is Google Compute Engine and what are its top alternatives?

Google Compute Engine is a flexible and scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) that allows users to create virtual machines and run various workloads on Google's infrastructure. Key features include customizable virtual machine configurations, global load balancing, automatic scaling, and integration with other Google Cloud services. However, limitations include complex pricing structure, lack of Windows support for some machine types, and the need for expertise in managing virtual machine instances.

  1. Amazon EC2: Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) offers a wide range of instance types, flexible pricing options, and integration with other AWS services. Pros include a vast global infrastructure, pay-as-you-go pricing model, and a wide selection of instance types. Cons may include complex pricing and additional costs for data transfer.
  2. Microsoft Azure Virtual Machines: Azure VMs provide on-demand computing power with various sizes and configurations to meet different workload requirements. Key features include hybrid cloud connectivity, auto-scaling, and support for Windows and Linux environments. Pros include easy integration with other Azure services, while cons may include potential downtime during updates.
  3. DigitalOcean Droplets: DigitalOcean offers Droplets as simple, scalable virtual machines with SSD storage and global data centers. Features include easy-to-use control panel, fixed pricing, and seamless integration with other DigitalOcean services. Pros include straightforward pricing and quick deployment, while cons may include limited instance types and services compared to bigger cloud providers.
  4. Vultr: Vultr provides high-performance cloud compute instances with multiple locations, SSD storage, and flexible configurations. Key features include hourly billing, fast provisioning, and a user-friendly control panel. Pros include competitive pricing and worldwide data centers, while cons may include fewer advanced features compared to major cloud providers.
  5. IBM Cloud Virtual Servers: IBM Cloud offers Virtual Servers with customizable configurations, scalable resources, and high availability. Features include integrated security, backup options, and support for various operating systems. Pros include IBM's enterprise-level security and compliance, while cons may include higher pricing for advanced features.
  6. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Compute: Oracle's Compute service provides customizable virtual machines with high performance, security, and reliability. Key features include bare metal instances, advanced networking options, and integration with Oracle Cloud services. Pros include strong security features and reliability, while cons may include limited global presence compared to other cloud providers.
  7. Alibaba Cloud Elastic Compute Service: Alibaba's ECS offers scalable virtual servers with burstable instances, flexible billing options, and a vast global network. Features include auto-scaling, load balancing, and integrated security services. Pros include competitive pricing and extensive support for global customers, while cons may include less familiarity outside of Asia.
  8. UpCloud: UpCloud provides high-performance cloud servers with SSD storage, private networking, and customizable configurations. Key features include fast deployment, hourly billing, and an intuitive control panel. Pros include superior performance and reliability, while cons may include limited global presence and fewer data center locations compared to larger providers.
  9. Linode: Linode offers cloud hosting with simple pricing, SSD storage, and a variety of instance types. Features include fast networking, API access, and a rich library of tutorials and guides. Pros include affordable pricing and excellent customer support, while cons may include limited managed services and smaller global reach compared to major players.
  10. Scaleway: Scaleway provides virtual cloud servers with ARM architecture, flexible configurations, and bare metal options. Key features include high-performance computing, private networks, and pay-as-you-go billing. Pros include innovative ARM-based servers and competitive pricing, while cons may include fewer cloud services and a smaller customer base compared to larger providers.

Top Alternatives to Google Compute Engine

  • Google App Engine
    Google App Engine

    Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow. ...

  • DigitalOcean
    DigitalOcean

    We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel. ...

  • Google Cloud Platform
    Google Cloud Platform

    It helps you build what's next with secure infrastructure, developer tools, APIs, data analytics and machine learning. It is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube. ...

  • Amazon EC2
    Amazon EC2

    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers. ...

  • Microsoft Azure
    Microsoft Azure

    Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment. ...

  • Kubernetes
    Kubernetes

    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions. ...

  • Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Amazon Web Services (AWS)

    It is a comprehensive and broadly adopted cloud platform, offering over 200 fully featured services from data centers globally. ...

  • Linode
    Linode

    Get a server running in minutes with your choice of Linux distro, resources, and node location. ...

Google Compute Engine alternatives & related posts

Google App Engine logo

Google App Engine

10K
7.8K
610
Build web applications on the same scalable systems that power Google applications
10K
7.8K
+ 1
610
PROS OF GOOGLE APP ENGINE
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
  • 35
    Low cost
  • 32
    Comprehensive set of features
  • 28
    All services in one place
  • 22
    Simple scaling
  • 19
    Quick and reliable cloud servers
  • 6
    Granular Billing
  • 5
    Easy to develop and unit test
  • 4
    Monitoring gives comprehensive set of key indicators
  • 3
    Really easy to quickly bring up a full stack
  • 3
    Create APIs quickly with cloud endpoints
  • 2
    Mostly up
  • 2
    No Ops
CONS OF GOOGLE APP ENGINE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Google App Engine posts

    Nick Rockwell
    SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 12 upvotes · 424.1K views

    So, the shift from Amazon EC2 to Google App Engine and generally #AWS to #GCP was a long decision and in the end, it's one that we've taken with eyes open and that we reserve the right to modify at any time. And to be clear, we continue to do a lot of stuff with AWS. But, by default, the content of the decision was, for our consumer-facing products, we're going to use GCP first. And if there's some reason why we don't think that's going to work out great, then we'll happily use AWS. In practice, that hasn't really happened. We've been able to meet almost 100% of our needs in GCP.

    So it's basically mostly Google Kubernetes Engine , we're mostly running stuff on Kubernetes right now.

    #AWStoGCPmigration #cloudmigration #migration

    See more
    Aliadoc Team

    In #Aliadoc, we're exploring the crowdfunding option to get traction before launch. We are building a SaaS platform for website design customization.

    For the Admin UI and website editor we use React and we're currently transitioning from a Create React App setup to a custom one because our needs have become more specific. We use CloudFlare as much as possible, it's a great service.

    For routing dynamic resources and proxy tasks to feed websites to the editor we leverage CloudFlare Workers for improved responsiveness. We use Firebase for our hosting needs and user authentication while also using several Cloud Functions for Firebase to interact with other services along with Google App Engine and Google Cloud Storage, but also the Real Time Database is on the radar for collaborative website editing.

    We generally hate configuration but honestly because of the stage of our project we lack resources for doing heavy sysops work. So we are basically just relying on Serverless technologies as much as we can to do all server side processing.

    Visual Studio Code definitively makes programming a much easier and enjoyable task, we just love it. We combine it with Bitbucket for our source code control needs.

    See more
    DigitalOcean logo

    DigitalOcean

    17.7K
    13K
    2.6K
    Deploy an SSD cloud server in less than 55 seconds with a dedicated IP and root access.
    17.7K
    13K
    + 1
    2.6K
    PROS OF DIGITALOCEAN
    • 560
      Great value for money
    • 364
      Simple dashboard
    • 362
      Good pricing
    • 300
      Ssds
    • 250
      Nice ui
    • 191
      Easy configuration
    • 156
      Great documentation
    • 138
      Ssh access
    • 135
      Great community
    • 24
      Ubuntu
    • 13
      Docker
    • 12
      IPv6 support
    • 10
      Private networking
    • 8
      99.99% uptime SLA
    • 7
      Simple API
    • 7
      Great tutorials
    • 6
      55 Second Provisioning
    • 5
      One Click Applications
    • 4
      Dokku
    • 4
      Node.js
    • 4
      LAMP
    • 4
      Debian
    • 4
      CoreOS
    • 3
      1Gb/sec Servers
    • 3
      Word Press
    • 3
      LEMP
    • 3
      Simple Control Panel
    • 3
      Mean
    • 3
      Ghost
    • 2
      Runs CoreOS
    • 2
      Quick and no nonsense service
    • 2
      Django
    • 2
      Good Tutorials
    • 2
      Speed
    • 2
      Ruby on Rails
    • 2
      GitLab
    • 2
      Hex Core machines with dedicated ECC Ram and RAID SSD s
    • 1
      CentOS
    • 1
      Spaces
    • 1
      KVM Virtualization
    • 1
      Amazing Hardware
    • 1
      Transfer Globally
    • 1
      Fedora
    • 1
      FreeBSD
    • 1
      Drupal
    • 1
      FreeBSD Amp
    • 1
      Magento
    • 1
      ownCloud
    • 1
      RedMine
    • 1
      My go to server provider
    • 1
      Ease and simplicity
    • 1
      Nice
    • 1
      Find it superfitting with my requirements (SSD, ssh.
    • 1
      Easy Setup
    • 1
      Cheap
    • 1
      Static IP
    • 1
      It's the easiest to get started for small projects
    • 1
      Automatic Backup
    • 1
      Great support
    • 1
      Quick and easy to set up
    • 1
      Servers on demand - literally
    • 1
      Reliability
    • 0
      Variety of services
    • 0
      Managed Kubernetes
    CONS OF DIGITALOCEAN
    • 3
      No live support chat
    • 3
      Pricing

    related DigitalOcean posts

    Hello, I'm currently writing an e-commerce website with Laravel and Laravel Nova (as an admin panel). I want to start deploying the app and created a DigitalOcean account. After some searches about the deployment process, I saw that the setup via DigitalOcean (using Droplets) isn't very easy for beginners. Now I'm not sure how to deploy my app. I am in between Laravel Forge and DigitalOcean (?Apps Platform or Droplets?). I've read that Heroku and Laravel Vapor are a bit expensive. That's why I didn't consider them yet. I'd be happy to read your opinions on that topic!

    See more

    Hi, I'm a beginner at using MySQL, I currently deployed my crud app on Heroku using the ClearDB add-on. I didn't see that coming, but the increased value of the primary key instead of being 1 is set to 10, and I cannot find a way to change it. Now I`m considering switching and deploying the full app and MySql to DigitalOcean any advice on that? Will I get the same issue? Thanks in advance!

    See more
    Google Cloud Platform logo

    Google Cloud Platform

    24.8K
    13.1K
    18
    A suite of cloud computing services
    24.8K
    13.1K
    + 1
    18
    PROS OF GOOGLE CLOUD PLATFORM
    • 5
      Good app Marketplace for Beginner and Advanced User
    • 4
      1 year free trial credit USD300
    • 3
      Premium tier IP address
    • 3
      Live chat support
    • 3
      Cheap
    CONS OF GOOGLE CLOUD PLATFORM
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Google Cloud Platform posts

      My days of using Firebase are over! I want to move to something scalable and possibly less cheap. In the past seven days I have done my research on what type of DB best fits my needs, and have chosen to go with the nonrelational DB; MongoDB. Although I understand it, I need help understanding how to set up the architecture. I have the client app (Flutter/ Dart) that would make HTTP requests to the web server (node/express), and from there the webserver would query data from MongoDB.

      How should I go about hosting the web server and MongoDb; do they have to be hosted together (this is where a lot of my confusion is)? Based on the research I've done, it seems like the standard practice would be to host on a VM provided by services such as Amazon Web Services, Google Cloud Platform, Microsoft Azure, etc. If there are better ways, such as possibly self-hosting (more responsibility), should I? Anyways, I just want to confirm with a community (you guys) to make sure I do this right, all input is highly appreciated.

      See more
      waheed khan
      Associate Java Developer at txtsol · | 8 upvotes · 21.3K views

      I want to make application like Zomato, #Foodpanda.

      Which stack is best for this? As I have expertise in Java and Angular. What is the best stack you will recommend?

      Web Micro-service / Mono? Angular / React? Amazon Web Services (AWS) / Google Cloud Platform? DB : SQL or No SQL

      Mob Cross-platform: React Native / Flutter

      Note: We are a team of 5. what languages do you recommend if I go with microservices?

      Thanks

      See more
      Amazon EC2 logo

      Amazon EC2

      47.6K
      35.2K
      2.5K
      Scalable, pay-as-you-go compute capacity in the cloud
      47.6K
      35.2K
      + 1
      2.5K
      PROS OF AMAZON EC2
      • 647
        Quick and reliable cloud servers
      • 515
        Scalability
      • 393
        Easy management
      • 277
        Low cost
      • 271
        Auto-scaling
      • 89
        Market leader
      • 80
        Backed by amazon
      • 79
        Reliable
      • 67
        Free tier
      • 58
        Easy management, scalability
      • 13
        Flexible
      • 10
        Easy to Start
      • 9
        Elastic
      • 9
        Web-scale
      • 9
        Widely used
      • 7
        Node.js API
      • 5
        Industry Standard
      • 4
        Lots of configuration options
      • 2
        GPU instances
      • 1
        Simpler to understand and learn
      • 1
        Extremely simple to use
      • 1
        Amazing for individuals
      • 1
        All the Open Source CLI tools you could want.
      CONS OF AMAZON EC2
      • 13
        Ui could use a lot of work
      • 6
        High learning curve when compared to PaaS
      • 3
        Extremely poor CPU performance

      related Amazon EC2 posts

      Ashish Singh
      Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest · | 38 upvotes · 2.9M views

      To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

      Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

      We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

      Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

      Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

      #BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 8.9M views

      Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

      • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
      • Respectively Git as revision control system
      • SourceTree as Git GUI
      • Visual Studio Code as IDE
      • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
      • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
      • SonarQube as quality gate
      • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
      • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
      • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
      • Heroku for deploying in test environments
      • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
      • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
      • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
      • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
      • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

      The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

      • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
      • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
      • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
      • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
      • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
      • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
      See more
      Microsoft Azure logo

      Microsoft Azure

      24.3K
      16.9K
      768
      Integrated cloud services and infrastructure to support computing, database, analytics, mobile, and web scenarios.
      24.3K
      16.9K
      + 1
      768
      PROS OF MICROSOFT AZURE
      • 114
        Scales well and quite easy
      • 96
        Can use .Net or open source tools
      • 81
        Startup friendly
      • 73
        Startup plans via BizSpark
      • 62
        High performance
      • 38
        Wide choice of services
      • 32
        Low cost
      • 32
        Lots of integrations
      • 31
        Reliability
      • 19
        Twillio & Github are directly accessible
      • 13
        RESTful API
      • 10
        PaaS
      • 10
        Enterprise Grade
      • 10
        Startup support
      • 8
        DocumentDB
      • 7
        In person support
      • 6
        Free for students
      • 6
        Service Bus
      • 6
        Virtual Machines
      • 5
        Redis Cache
      • 5
        It rocks
      • 4
        Storage, Backup, and Recovery
      • 4
        Infrastructure Services
      • 4
        SQL Databases
      • 4
        CDN
      • 3
        Integration
      • 3
        Scheduler
      • 3
        Preview Portal
      • 3
        HDInsight
      • 3
        Built on Node.js
      • 3
        Big Data
      • 3
        BizSpark 60k Azure Benefit
      • 3
        IaaS
      • 2
        Backup
      • 2
        Open cloud
      • 2
        Web
      • 2
        SaaS
      • 2
        Big Compute
      • 2
        Mobile
      • 2
        Media
      • 2
        Dev-Test
      • 2
        Storage
      • 2
        StorSimple
      • 2
        Machine Learning
      • 2
        Stream Analytics
      • 2
        Data Factory
      • 2
        Event Hubs
      • 2
        Virtual Network
      • 2
        ExpressRoute
      • 2
        Traffic Manager
      • 2
        Media Services
      • 2
        BizTalk Services
      • 2
        Site Recovery
      • 2
        Active Directory
      • 2
        Multi-Factor Authentication
      • 2
        Visual Studio Online
      • 2
        Application Insights
      • 2
        Automation
      • 2
        Operational Insights
      • 2
        Key Vault
      • 2
        Infrastructure near your customers
      • 2
        Easy Deployment
      • 1
        Enterprise customer preferences
      • 1
        Documentation
      • 1
        Security
      • 1
        Best cloud platfrom
      • 1
        Easy and fast to start with
      • 1
        Remote Debugging
      CONS OF MICROSOFT AZURE
      • 7
        Confusing UI
      • 2
        Expensive plesk on Azure

      related Microsoft Azure posts

      Omar Mehilba
      Co-Founder and COO at Magalix · | 19 upvotes · 424.6K views

      We are hardcore Kubernetes users and contributors. We loved the automation it provides. However, as our team grew and added more clusters and microservices, capacity and resources management becomes a massive pain to us. We started suffering from a lot of outages and unexpected behavior as we promote our code from dev to production environments. Luckily we were working on our AI-powered tools to understand different dependencies, predict usage, and calculate the right resources and configurations that should be applied to our infrastructure and microservices. We dogfooded our agent (http://github.com/magalixcorp/magalix-agent) and were able to stabilize as the #autopilot continuously recovered any miscalculations we made or because of unexpected changes in workloads. We are open sourcing our agent in a few days. Check it out and let us know what you think! We run workloads on Microsoft Azure Google Kubernetes Engine and Amazon EC2 and we're all about Go and Python!

      See more
      Kestas Barzdaitis
      Entrepreneur & Engineer · | 16 upvotes · 764.3K views

      CodeFactor being a #SAAS product, our goal was to run on a cloud-native infrastructure since day one. We wanted to stay product focused, rather than having to work on the infrastructure that supports the application. We needed a cloud-hosting provider that would be reliable, economical and most efficient for our product.

      CodeFactor.io aims to provide an automated and frictionless code review service for software developers. That requires agility, instant provisioning, autoscaling, security, availability and compliance management features. We looked at the top three #IAAS providers that take up the majority of market share: Amazon's Amazon EC2 , Microsoft's Microsoft Azure, and Google Compute Engine.

      AWS has been available since 2006 and has developed the most extensive services ant tools variety at a massive scale. Azure and GCP are about half the AWS age, but also satisfied our technical requirements.

      It is worth noting that even though all three providers support Docker containerization services, GCP has the most robust offering due to their investments in Kubernetes. Also, if you are a Microsoft shop, and develop in .NET - Visual Studio Azure shines at integration there and all your existing .NET code works seamlessly on Azure. All three providers have serverless computing offerings (AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, and Google Cloud Functions). Additionally, all three providers have machine learning tools, but GCP appears to be the most developer-friendly, intuitive and complete when it comes to #Machinelearning and #AI.

      The prices between providers are competitive across the board. For our requirements, AWS would have been the most expensive, GCP the least expensive and Azure was in the middle. Plus, if you #Autoscale frequently with large deltas, note that Azure and GCP have per minute billing, where AWS bills you per hour. We also applied for the #Startup programs with all three providers, and this is where Azure shined. While AWS and GCP for startups would have covered us for about one year of infrastructure costs, Azure Sponsorship would cover about two years of CodeFactor's hosting costs. Moreover, Azure Team was terrific - I felt that they wanted to work with us where for AWS and GCP we were just another startup.

      In summary, we were leaning towards GCP. GCP's advantages in containerization, automation toolset, #Devops mindset, and pricing were the driving factors there. Nevertheless, we could not say no to Azure's financial incentives and a strong sense of partnership and support throughout the process.

      Bottom line is, IAAS offerings with AWS, Azure, and GCP are evolving fast. At CodeFactor, we aim to be platform agnostic where it is practical and retain the flexibility to cherry-pick the best products across providers.

      See more
      Kubernetes logo

      Kubernetes

      58.5K
      50.6K
      677
      Manage a cluster of Linux containers as a single system to accelerate Dev and simplify Ops
      58.5K
      50.6K
      + 1
      677
      PROS OF KUBERNETES
      • 164
        Leading docker container management solution
      • 128
        Simple and powerful
      • 106
        Open source
      • 76
        Backed by google
      • 58
        The right abstractions
      • 25
        Scale services
      • 20
        Replication controller
      • 11
        Permission managment
      • 9
        Supports autoscaling
      • 8
        Cheap
      • 8
        Simple
      • 6
        Self-healing
      • 5
        No cloud platform lock-in
      • 5
        Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
      • 5
        Open, powerful, stable
      • 5
        Reliable
      • 4
        Scalable
      • 4
        Quick cloud setup
      • 3
        Cloud Agnostic
      • 3
        Captain of Container Ship
      • 3
        A self healing environment with rich metadata
      • 3
        Runs on azure
      • 3
        Backed by Red Hat
      • 3
        Custom and extensibility
      • 2
        Sfg
      • 2
        Gke
      • 2
        Everything of CaaS
      • 2
        Golang
      • 2
        Easy setup
      • 2
        Expandable
      CONS OF KUBERNETES
      • 16
        Steep learning curve
      • 15
        Poor workflow for development
      • 8
        Orchestrates only infrastructure
      • 4
        High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
      • 2
        Too heavy for simple systems
      • 1
        Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
      • 1
        More moving parts to secure
      • 1
        Additional Technology Overhead

      related Kubernetes posts

      Conor Myhrvold
      Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 9.6M views

      How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

      Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

      Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

      https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

      (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

      Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

      See more
      Yshay Yaacobi

      Our first experience with .NET core was when we developed our OSS feature management platform - Tweek (https://github.com/soluto/tweek). We wanted to create a solution that is able to run anywhere (super important for OSS), has excellent performance characteristics and can fit in a multi-container architecture. We decided to implement our rule engine processor in F# , our main service was implemented in C# and other components were built using JavaScript / TypeScript and Go.

      Visual Studio Code worked really well for us as well, it worked well with all our polyglot services and the .Net core integration had great cross-platform developer experience (to be fair, F# was a bit trickier) - actually, each of our team members used a different OS (Ubuntu, macos, windows). Our production deployment ran for a time on Docker Swarm until we've decided to adopt Kubernetes with almost seamless migration process.

      After our positive experience of running .Net core workloads in containers and developing Tweek's .Net services on non-windows machines, C# had gained back some of its popularity (originally lost to Node.js), and other teams have been using it for developing microservices, k8s sidecars (like https://github.com/Soluto/airbag), cli tools, serverless functions and other projects...

      See more
      Amazon Web Services (AWS) logo

      Amazon Web Services (AWS)

      28.9K
      2.9K
      0
      A comprehensive and broadly adopted cloud platform
      28.9K
      2.9K
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF AMAZON WEB SERVICES (AWS)
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF AMAZON WEB SERVICES (AWS)
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Amazon Web Services (AWS) posts

          waheed khan
          Associate Java Developer at txtsol · | 8 upvotes · 21.3K views

          I want to make application like Zomato, #Foodpanda.

          Which stack is best for this? As I have expertise in Java and Angular. What is the best stack you will recommend?

          Web Micro-service / Mono? Angular / React? Amazon Web Services (AWS) / Google Cloud Platform? DB : SQL or No SQL

          Mob Cross-platform: React Native / Flutter

          Note: We are a team of 5. what languages do you recommend if I go with microservices?

          Thanks

          See more
          Santiago Velasco
          Java Software Developer at ViewNext · | 8 upvotes · 12.6K views

          Hello everyone, I would like to start using a cloud service to host my projects, which are web applications. If anyone has enough experience with Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Google Cloud Platform, I would like to know which of these is most recommended to use, depending on the features they have or how used they are. Thank you so much.

          See more
          Linode logo

          Linode

          742
          620
          422
          Deploy and Manage Linux Virtual Servers in the Linode Cloud.
          742
          620
          + 1
          422
          PROS OF LINODE
          • 100
            Extremely reliable
          • 70
            Good value
          • 60
            Great customer support
          • 58
            Easy to configure
          • 37
            Great documentation
          • 24
            Servers across the world
          • 18
            Managed/hosted DNS service
          • 15
            Simple ui
          • 11
            Network and CPU usage graphs
          • 7
            IPv6 support
          • 6
            Multiple IP address support
          • 3
            Good price, good cusomter sevice
          • 3
            Ssh access
          • 2
            IP address fail over support
          • 2
            SSH root access
          • 1
            Great performance compared to EC2 or DO
          • 1
            It runs apps with speed
          • 1
            Best customizable VPS
          • 1
            Latest kernels
          • 1
            Cheapest
          • 1
            Ssds
          CONS OF LINODE
          • 2
            No "floating IP" support

          related Linode posts

          Kumar Gaurav
          DevOps Engineer at CoRover Private Limited · | 2 upvotes · 182.5K views
          Shared insights
          on
          Microsoft AzureMicrosoft AzureLinodeLinode

          What is the data transfer out cost (Bandwidth cost) on Linode compared to Microsoft Azure?

          See more