StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Slack vs XMPP

Slack vs XMPP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Slack
Slack
Stacks120.8K
Followers97.7K
Votes6.0K
XMPP
XMPP
Stacks71
Followers138
Votes0

Slack vs XMPP: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Slack and XMPP. Both Slack and XMPP are messaging protocols used for communication, but they have some distinct features and functionalities.

  1. Message Formatting and Rich Content Support: Slack offers a rich set of formatting options that allow users to emphasize words, create bullet points, add hyperlinks, and even insert code snippets with syntax highlighting. Additionally, it supports the embedding of media files, such as images, videos, and documents. On the other hand, XMPP's message formatting capabilities are more limited, primarily supporting basic text styling without rich content embedding.

  2. User Experience and Interface: Slack is designed with a modern, user-friendly interface that focuses on enhancing collaboration. It provides features like real-time typing indicators, user presence status, and threaded conversations to improve communication efficiency. In contrast, XMPP has a simpler and more traditional interface, which may lack some of the advanced collaboration features found in Slack.

  3. Third-Party Integration Ecosystem: Slack boasts a vast selection of third-party integrations, which allow users to connect with various external services, such as project management tools, customer support systems, and development platforms. These integrations enhance productivity, streamline workflows, and facilitate seamless information sharing. XMPP, while also supporting integrations, typically has a smaller ecosystem of compatible applications and services.

  4. Support for Public and Private Channels: Slack enables the creation of both public and private channels, where users can join or be invited based on their interests or roles. Public channels encourage transparency and open communication, while private channels offer a confidential space for specific teams or projects. In XMPP, the concept of channels is less prevalent, and a greater focus is placed on direct messaging between individual users or small groups.

  5. Notifications and Real-Time Updates: Slack provides comprehensive notification settings, allowing users to customize how they receive updates and alerts. Users can choose to be notified about specific keywords, mentions, or activity within particular channels. XMPP also offers notification capabilities, but its options might be more limited compared to Slack's extensive range of notification preferences.

  6. Privacy and Security: Slack employs robust security measures, including encryption at rest and in transit, two-factor authentication, and compliance with various data protection regulations. It also offers enterprise-grade features like data retention, eDiscovery, and compliance exports. While XMPP supports encryption, its security features may vary depending on the specific implementation and server configuration.

In summary, Slack offers advanced message formatting, a modern interface with collaboration-focused features, a vast integration ecosystem, support for public and private channels, extensive notification options, and strong security measures. XMPP, on the other hand, has a simpler message formatting system, a traditional interface, a more limited integration ecosystem, a focus on direct messaging rather than channels, fewer notification customization options, and potentially varied security measures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Slack, XMPP

Remotor
Remotor

Apr 13, 2020

Decided

Keybase is a powerful and secure team-organizing software. And because Keybase is so transparently good at what it does, Keybase is a foundational software that facilitates the future of work: effective, inclusive, secure Remote Teams.

Keybase is a free, end-to-end encrypted, open-source program with almost limitless flexibility. Each Keybase user or team is a unique cryptographic identity. Each message or interaction that a user has with a team or other user, is verifiable and digitally-signed. Custom combinations of users/teams/bots, can be designed to catalyze Remote Teams of all kinds, this process can also be automated. Keybase includes Git integration for versioning, bots from multiple platforms to facilitate audio/video-conferencing, a Cryptocurrency wallet, and many advanced privacy features to make you more or less traceable.

Services like Slack and Discord are centralized platforms that perform analytics on your behavior and can sell or leak this data to 3rd parties. Any audio/video features available within Slack or Discord, are bound to be less secure and less flexible than excellent alternatives such as Jitsi. Slack and Discord do have a fun, causal feel to them, which can potentially facilitate social engagement in certain conditions (also many users are already on these platforms).

Centralized and Proprietary team platforms such as Discord and Slack have a large market presence (at least in the USA) based on their first-mover advantage, name recognition, and network effects from size. However these products do not have the flexibility or power of Keybase. Keybase excels on its own excellence, and also has an open and active developer community.

Find us on Keybase: @remotorteam (Keybase username) @remotor.public (Public Keybase Team)

132k views132k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 24, 2019

Needs adviceonGitterGitterDiscordDiscordSpectrumSpectrum

From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."

1.32M views1.32M
Comments
Stefan
Stefan

CEO / CTO at DROOM! #wirmachenweb #vienna

Feb 10, 2020

Decided

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Slack
Slack
XMPP
XMPP

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.

Create open channels for the projects, groups and topics that the whole team shares.;Search with context;Autocomplete makes mentioning your teammates quick and painless.;Configurable notifications for desktop, mobile push and email keep you as informed as you’d like.;Everything is perfectly in sync as you move between your desktop, iPhone, iPad, or Android device.;Powerful search & archiving means you can forget when you need to: we’ll remember for you.;Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub Integration;Add comments for feedback & stars for easy retrieval;Built-in internal and external sharing options ensure you can get and share any file with anyone
-
Statistics
Stacks
120.8K
Stacks
71
Followers
97.7K
Followers
138
Votes
6.0K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1209
    Easy to integrate with
  • 876
    Excellent interface on multiple platforms
  • 849
    Free
  • 694
    Mobile friendly
  • 690
    People really enjoy using it
Cons
  • 13
    Can be distracting depending on how you use it
  • 6
    Limit messages history
  • 6
    Requires some management for large teams
  • 5
    You don't really own your messages
  • 5
    Too expensive
No community feedback yet
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Zapier
Zapier
Stripe
Stripe
Asana
Asana
GoSquared
GoSquared
Dropbox
Dropbox
New Relic
New Relic
Google Drive
Google Drive
Zendesk
Zendesk
Java
Java
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Slack, XMPP?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase