Sentry vs Stackdriver

Overview

Sentry

Stacks15.1K

Followers9.4K

Votes864

GitHub Stars42.4K

Forks4.5K

Stackdriver

Stacks318

Followers349

Votes67

Sentry vs Stackdriver: What are the differences?

Introduction

To compare Sentry and Stackdriver, here are the key differences between the two:

Pricing: Sentry offers a flexible pricing model with a free tier for individuals and small teams, while Stackdriver is charged based on usage and comes with a 30-day free trial. With Sentry, you can control your costs more effectively if you have a small team or limited usage requirements.
Supported Languages and Platforms: Sentry supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, including Python, JavaScript, PHP, Ruby, Java, and more. On the other hand, Stackdriver has better integration with Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services and focuses primarily on cloud-native applications.
Error Monitoring and Alerting: Both Sentry and Stackdriver provide error monitoring and alerting capabilities. However, Sentry offers more detailed insights into errors by capturing additional context such as breadcrumbs and environment information. Stackdriver focuses on monitoring and alerting within the GCP ecosystem, which may be more suitable for organizations heavily reliant on GCP services.
Customization and Configurability: Sentry provides extensive customization options, allowing you to tailor the error tracking experience to your specific needs. You can define custom error filters, set up release tracking, and configure various integrations. Stackdriver, while offering some customization options, may have more limitations due to its focus on GCP services.
Performance Monitoring: Stackdriver includes built-in performance monitoring capabilities, allowing you to track latency, throughput, and error rates of your applications. Sentry primarily focuses on error monitoring but integrates with performance monitoring tools like Datadog or New Relic for additional insights if needed.
Collaboration and Team Management: Sentry provides advanced collaboration features, such as assigning issues, adding comments, and sharing error reports with team members. Stackdriver also offers collaboration features, but they are more tailored towards GCP workflows and may not be as feature-rich as Sentry's collaboration capabilities.

In summary, while both Sentry and Stackdriver offer error monitoring and alerting capabilities, Sentry provides a more customizable and platform-agnostic solution with a flexible pricing model. On the other hand, Stackdriver is tightly integrated with GCP services, making it a suitable choice for organizations heavily using Google Cloud Platform.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sentry, Stackdriver

Nicholas

Jun 1, 2020

Decided

I essentially inherited a Shopify theme that was originally created by an agency. After discovering a number of errors being thrown in the Dev Console just by scrolling through the website, I needed more visibility over any errors happening in the field. Having used both Sentry and TrackJS, I always got lost in the TrackJS interface, so I felt more comfortable introducing Sentry. The Sentry free tier is also very generous, although it turns out the theme threw over 15k errors in less than a week.

I highly recommend setting up error tracking from day one. Theoretically, you should never need to upgrade from the free tier if you're keeping on top of the errors...

250k views250k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sentry	Stackdriver
Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health.	Google Stackdriver provides powerful monitoring, logging, and diagnostics. It equips you with insight into the health, performance, and availability of cloud-powered applications, enabling you to find and fix issues faster.
Real-Time Updates: For the first time, developers can fix code-level issues anywhere in the stack well before users even encounter an error.;Complete Context: Spend more time where it matters, rather than investing in low-impact issues.;Integrate Everywhere: Drop-in integration for every major platform, framework, and language -- JavaScript, Python, PHP, Ruby, Node, Java, .NET, mobile.;Root Cause: See the events that lead to errors so you always debug the right thing the first time.;Private & Secure: Sentry is SOC-2 compliant with GDPR, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and Privacy Shield by default.;Open Source: Sentry is 100% open source and available on GitHub.	Monitoring;Logging;Diagnostics;Application Tracing;Error Reporting;Alerting;Uptime Monitoring;Multi-cloud;Production Debugger;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 42.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 15.1K	Stacks 318
Followers 9.4K	Followers 349
Votes 864	Votes 67
Pros & Cons
Pros 238 Consolidates similar errors and makes resolution easy 121 Email Notifications 108 Open source 84 Slack integration 71 Github integration Cons 12 Confusing UI 4 Bundle size	Pros 19 Monitoring 11 Logging 8 Alerting 7 Tracing 6 Uptime Monitoring Cons 2 Not free
Integrations
Sprint.ly C# PagerDuty Twilio Auth0 Golang Datadog Backbone.js Django Swift	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Sentry, Stackdriver?

Rollbar

Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra

Bugsnag

Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast.

Amazon CloudWatch

It helps you gain system-wide visibility into resource utilization, application performance, and operational health. It retrieve your monitoring data, view graphs to help take automated action based on the state of your cloud environment.

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Opbeat

Opbeat is application monitoring for developers, and gives you performance metrics, error logging, release tracking and workflow in one smart product.

Airbrake

Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast.

Honeybadger

Honeybadger does more than report errors, it helps you work with your team to fix them. Errors can be assigned. You can comment via email. And a fine-grained permissions system means you control who has access to each specific project.

Errbit

Errbit is a tool for collecting and managing errors from other applications. It is Airbrake (formerly known as Hoptoad) API compliant, so if you are already using Airbrake, you can just point the airbrake gem to your Errbit server.

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

OverOps

OverOps maps the DNA of code as it’s executing in pre-prod and production to Identify all issues and anomalies, and deliver True Root Cause to the right person, without relying on logs.

Related Comparisons

Sentry vs Stackdriver: What are the differences?

Introduction

To compare Sentry and Stackdriver, here are the key differences between the two:

Pricing: Sentry offers a flexible pricing model with a free tier for individuals and small teams, while Stackdriver is charged based on usage and comes with a 30-day free trial. With Sentry, you can control your costs more effectively if you have a small team or limited usage requirements.
Supported Languages and Platforms: Sentry supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, including Python, JavaScript, PHP, Ruby, Java, and more. On the other hand, Stackdriver has better integration with Google Cloud Platform (GCP) services and focuses primarily on cloud-native applications.
Error Monitoring and Alerting: Both Sentry and Stackdriver provide error monitoring and alerting capabilities. However, Sentry offers more detailed insights into errors by capturing additional context such as breadcrumbs and environment information. Stackdriver focuses on monitoring and alerting within the GCP ecosystem, which may be more suitable for organizations heavily reliant on GCP services.
Customization and Configurability: Sentry provides extensive customization options, allowing you to tailor the error tracking experience to your specific needs. You can define custom error filters, set up release tracking, and configure various integrations. Stackdriver, while offering some customization options, may have more limitations due to its focus on GCP services.
Performance Monitoring: Stackdriver includes built-in performance monitoring capabilities, allowing you to track latency, throughput, and error rates of your applications. Sentry primarily focuses on error monitoring but integrates with performance monitoring tools like Datadog or New Relic for additional insights if needed.
Collaboration and Team Management: Sentry provides advanced collaboration features, such as assigning issues, adding comments, and sharing error reports with team members. Stackdriver also offers collaboration features, but they are more tailored towards GCP workflows and may not be as feature-rich as Sentry's collaboration capabilities.

Sentry vs Stackdriver

Overview

Sentry vs Stackdriver: What are the differences?