Mattermost vs Yammer

Overview

Yammer

Stacks72

Followers67

Votes0

Mattermost

Stacks480

Followers582

Votes302

Mattermost vs Yammer: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Mattermost and Yammer are highlighted below:

Platform Focus: Mattermost is designed as a self-hosted, open-source messaging platform that offers greater customization and control over data. On the other hand, Yammer is a cloud-based enterprise social networking platform focused on facilitating collaboration and communication within organizations through a centralized platform.
Integration Capabilities: Mattermost allows for seamless integration with a wide range of third-party applications and services through its flexible architecture and open APIs. In contrast, Yammer offers integrations mainly with Microsoft products and services, limiting its compatibility with other external tools.
Privacy and Security: Mattermost provides enhanced privacy and security features, such as end-to-end encryption and compliance with data protection regulations like GDPR, giving users more control over their data privacy. Yammer, while secure, may not offer the same level of data protection and encryption options as Mattermost.
Customization and Branding: Mattermost enables organizations to fully customize the platform's look and feel, including themes, logos, and branding elements, to align with corporate identity and culture. Yammer, while customizable to some extent, may have limitations in terms of branding and customization options compared to Mattermost.
Deployment Options: Mattermost offers users the flexibility to deploy the platform on-premises or in private clouds, giving organizations more control over their data storage and security requirements. In contrast, Yammer is primarily cloud-based, limiting deployment options for organizations that require on-premises solutions for regulatory or compliance reasons.
User Experience: Mattermost focuses on providing a user-friendly interface and intuitive user experience, which can be tailored to match the preferences of individual users or teams. Yammer, while user-friendly, may have a more standardized interface that offers fewer customization options for personalizing the user experience.

In Summary, the key differences between Mattermost and Yammer lie in platform focus, integration capabilities, privacy and security, customization and branding options, deployment choices, and user experience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Yammer	Mattermost
Yammer brings the power of social networking to your company. Collaborate securely across departments, geographies, content and business applications.	Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.
Accessing Yammer- Access Yammer from anywhere with an internet connection. Stay connected from your web browser, mobile device, or tablet. You can also view and interact with Yammer content within other business applications -- such as Sharepoint - using our API integrations.;People and Conversations- Whether your company spans seven cubicles or seven continents, Yammer helps your team collaborate on content, ask questions, share knowledge, and get work done.;Content Collaboration- Create, discuss, and share content with coworkers without sending a single email. Store large files, post documents to team workspaces, and collaboratively edit Pages in real time.;Search- Find the content, conversations, people and business data you need, when you need them. Search instantly across your entire company and all your other business applications.;Admin (Analytics & Security)- As a Yammer Network Administrator you can customize, control, monitor, and manage your Yammer network according to your company’s needs.;External Networks- Connect and collaborate with external customers, vendors and business partners.;Platform- Eliminate information silos and enable seamless collaboration across your company by connecting them with a single social platform. Yammer’s open APIs make it easy to integrate with SAP, SharePoint, and other existing business systems.;Feature List- Yammer provides a variety of tools that make it easy to connect, collaborate, and work better together.	All your team communication in one place, searchable and accessible anywhere; Slack-compatible, not Slack-limited. Imports Slack channels, users and themes. Offers Slack-compatible webhooks and integrations including Hubot, Jenkins, GitLab and others; Self-host ready with System Console and IT admin tools for managing dozens of team sites. Installs with Linux binary, plus Docker, Heroku, AWS, Azure and Cloud Foundry options
Statistics
Stacks 72	Stacks 480
Followers 67	Followers 582
Votes 0	Votes 302
Pros & Cons
Pros 0 By microsoft	Pros 60 Open source 41 On-premise deployment 26 Free 22 Built using golang 21 Fast and easy to use Cons 2 Less integrations and plugins than slack 2 Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise 2 Many basic features are enterprise only 1 Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB 1 Basic permissions only in enterprise edition
Integrations
Zendesk Salesforce Sales Cloud NetSuite Box UserVoice Expensify Get Satisfaction RightSignature	AWS Elastic Beanstalk Amazon EC2 Segment Jenkins GitLab Microsoft Azure Google Compute Engine Hubot Cloud Foundry Amazon SES

What are some alternatives to Yammer, Mattermost?

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

eXo Platform

eXo Platform is a digital workplace solution that allows businesses to connect, engage, empower and reward teams.

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Related Comparisons

Mattermost vs Yammer: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Mattermost and Yammer are highlighted below:

Platform Focus: Mattermost is designed as a self-hosted, open-source messaging platform that offers greater customization and control over data. On the other hand, Yammer is a cloud-based enterprise social networking platform focused on facilitating collaboration and communication within organizations through a centralized platform.
Integration Capabilities: Mattermost allows for seamless integration with a wide range of third-party applications and services through its flexible architecture and open APIs. In contrast, Yammer offers integrations mainly with Microsoft products and services, limiting its compatibility with other external tools.
Privacy and Security: Mattermost provides enhanced privacy and security features, such as end-to-end encryption and compliance with data protection regulations like GDPR, giving users more control over their data privacy. Yammer, while secure, may not offer the same level of data protection and encryption options as Mattermost.
Customization and Branding: Mattermost enables organizations to fully customize the platform's look and feel, including themes, logos, and branding elements, to align with corporate identity and culture. Yammer, while customizable to some extent, may have limitations in terms of branding and customization options compared to Mattermost.
Deployment Options: Mattermost offers users the flexibility to deploy the platform on-premises or in private clouds, giving organizations more control over their data storage and security requirements. In contrast, Yammer is primarily cloud-based, limiting deployment options for organizations that require on-premises solutions for regulatory or compliance reasons.
User Experience: Mattermost focuses on providing a user-friendly interface and intuitive user experience, which can be tailored to match the preferences of individual users or teams. Yammer, while user-friendly, may have a more standardized interface that offers fewer customization options for personalizing the user experience.

Mattermost vs Yammer

Overview