Kong vs Mashery

Overview

Mashery

Stacks13

Followers26

Votes2

Kong

Stacks671

Followers1.5K

Votes139

GitHub Stars42.1K

Forks5.0K

Kong vs Mashery: What are the differences?

Kong and Mashery are both API management platforms used to control and manage APIs. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

Integration with different infrastructure: Kong is built on top of Nginx and can be deployed on any infrastructure including on-premise, cloud, or hybrid. On the other hand, Mashery is a cloud-native API management solution owned by TIBCO and primarily operates in the cloud environment.
Open-source vs proprietary: Kong is an open-source API gateway that offers a free community edition with basic features and a paid enterprise edition with additional functionalities. Mashery, on the contrary, is a proprietary solution with its features and capabilities limited to what is provided by the vendor.
Flexibility and customization: Kong allows more flexibility and customization through its plugin architecture, which allows developers to extend its functionalities and integrate with other services or systems easily. Mashery, on the other hand, provides less room for customization and relies more on the out-of-the-box features provided by the vendor.
Developer community and ecosystem: Kong has a large and active open-source community that constantly contributes to the platform's development and improvement. This results in a wide range of available plugin options and frequent updates. Mashery, being a proprietary solution, has a smaller developer community and limited ecosystem in comparison.
Deployment options: Kong offers multiple deployment options, including Docker, Kubernetes, and VM-based installations. This provides flexibility and adaptability to different infrastructure requirements. Mashery, being a cloud-native solution, primarily operates in the cloud and may have limitations when it comes to on-premise or hybrid deployments.
Pricing model: Kong's pricing model is based on a subscription and usage-based model, with different tiers available for different levels of support, performance, and features. Mashery, on the other hand, follows a traditional license-based pricing model, which may not be as flexible or scalable for organizations with varying needs.

In Summary, Kong offers more flexibility, customization options, and a larger developer community compared to Mashery, while Mashery provides a cloud-native solution with a more streamlined and controlled environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Mashery, Kong

Prateek

Mar 14, 2020

Decided

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

322k views322k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Mashery	Kong
Sign In and discover new APIs from our open data commons of RESTful APIs. Mashery's API management offerings include strategic consulting & developer support to help you build your business.	Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.
Mashery API Explorer- Sign In and discover new APIs from our open data commons of RESTful APIs or contributed from our open source I/O Docs GitHub Project;Developer Connect- Developer Connect matches API developers with API projects.;API Status Monitor- The Mashery API Status monitor provides this transparency with third-party real-time and historical performance issues.	Logging: Log requests and responses to your system over TCP, UDP or to disk; OAuth2.0: Add easily an OAuth2.0 authentication to your APIs; Monitoring: Live monitoring provides key load and performance server metrics; IP-restriction: Whitelist or blacklist IPs that can make requests; Authentication: Manage consumer credentials query string and header tokens; Rate-limiting: Block and throttle requests based on IP or authentication; Transformations: Add, remove or manipulate HTTP params and headers on-the-fly; CORS: Enable cross-origin requests to your APIs that would otherwise be blocked; Anything: Need custom functionality? Extend Kong with your own Lua plugins;
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 42.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 5.0K
Stacks 13	Stacks 671
Followers 26	Followers 1.5K
Votes 2	Votes 139
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Cheese-like 1 Hard to use	Pros 37 Easy to maintain 32 Easy to install 26 Flexible 21 Great performance 7 Api blueprint
Integrations
No integrations available	Cassandra Docker Prometheus Kubernetes PostgreSQL NGINX Vagrant

What are some alternatives to Mashery, Kong?

Amazon API Gateway

Amazon API Gateway handles all the tasks involved in accepting and processing up to hundreds of thousands of concurrent API calls, including traffic management, authorization and access control, monitoring, and API version management.

Tyk Cloud

Tyk is a leading Open Source API Gateway and Management Platform, featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. We power billions of transactions for thousands of innovative organisations.

Mashape

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

3scale

3scale's API Management platform provides services and solutions, allowing you to Operate, Manage and Distribute your APIs. Trusted by 450+ API programs.

RapidAPI

RapidAPI is the worlds largest API marketplace with over 10,000 APIs available. Developers can find, connect, and manage all of their API connections through a single platform. As an API Provider, you can market, manage, and monetize your API on the world’s largest API marketplace, instantly exposing it to 1 million developers.

Moesif

Build a winning API platform with instant, meaningful visibility into API usage and customer adoption

Ambassador

Map services to arbitrary URLs in a single, declarative YAML file. Configure routes with CORS support, circuit breakers, timeouts, and more. Replace your Kubernetes ingress controller. Route gRPC, WebSockets, or HTTP.

ProgrammableWeb

ProgrammableWeb is more than a directory and community, it's programmable. Our "API for APIs" gives you a simple and structured way to access the powerful registry and repository capabilities of PW. Use your favorite language to search and retrieve APIs, mashups, and other data from our catalog. We've got samples in PHP, Java, .NET and JavaScript to get you started.

Azure API Management

Today's innovative enterprises are adopting API architectures to accelerate growth. Streamline your work across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with a single place for managing all your APIs.

API Umbrella

API Umbrella is a proxy that sits in front of your APIs. It can seamlessly add common functionality like api keys, rate limiting, and analytics to any API.

Related Comparisons

Kong vs Mashery: What are the differences?

Kong and Mashery are both API management platforms used to control and manage APIs. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

Integration with different infrastructure: Kong is built on top of Nginx and can be deployed on any infrastructure including on-premise, cloud, or hybrid. On the other hand, Mashery is a cloud-native API management solution owned by TIBCO and primarily operates in the cloud environment.
Open-source vs proprietary: Kong is an open-source API gateway that offers a free community edition with basic features and a paid enterprise edition with additional functionalities. Mashery, on the contrary, is a proprietary solution with its features and capabilities limited to what is provided by the vendor.
Flexibility and customization: Kong allows more flexibility and customization through its plugin architecture, which allows developers to extend its functionalities and integrate with other services or systems easily. Mashery, on the other hand, provides less room for customization and relies more on the out-of-the-box features provided by the vendor.
Developer community and ecosystem: Kong has a large and active open-source community that constantly contributes to the platform's development and improvement. This results in a wide range of available plugin options and frequent updates. Mashery, being a proprietary solution, has a smaller developer community and limited ecosystem in comparison.
Deployment options: Kong offers multiple deployment options, including Docker, Kubernetes, and VM-based installations. This provides flexibility and adaptability to different infrastructure requirements. Mashery, being a cloud-native solution, primarily operates in the cloud and may have limitations when it comes to on-premise or hybrid deployments.
Pricing model: Kong's pricing model is based on a subscription and usage-based model, with different tiers available for different levels of support, performance, and features. Mashery, on the other hand, follows a traditional license-based pricing model, which may not be as flexible or scalable for organizations with varying needs.

Kong vs Mashery

Overview