Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Firebase vs Linode: What are the differences?
Introduction
Firebase and Linode are both popular platforms used for web and mobile app development, but they differ in several key aspects.
1. Pricing and Billing Model: Firebase offers a usage-based pricing model, where you pay for the specific features and services you use, such as database storage, authentication, and notifications. In contrast, Linode provides a fixed pricing model, where you pay for a set amount of resources (e.g., CPU, RAM, storage) regardless of usage. This makes Firebase more suitable for projects with varying resource requirements, while Linode may be more cost-effective for predictable workloads.
2. Hosting and Scalability: Firebase includes a built-in hosting service that allows you to deploy static websites and web apps easily. It also provides automatic scaling to handle sudden bursts in traffic. On the other hand, Linode offers Virtual Private Servers (VPS) that give you complete control over the server environment for hosting your applications. While both platforms offer scalability options, Linode's approach provides more flexibility and customization for advanced users.
3. Backend Development: Firebase offers a comprehensive suite of backend services, such as real-time database, authentication, cloud functions, and messaging, which can be easily integrated into your applications. Linode, being an Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) provider, focuses more on providing server infrastructure rather than specific backend features. This makes Firebase a better choice for developers who prefer a ready-to-use backend solution with minimal setup and maintenance.
4. Database Options: Firebase provides a NoSQL real-time database that allows for synchronization and offline data capabilities. It is well-suited for applications that require real-time updates and collaborative features. On the other hand, Linode does not offer a specific database service but allows you to set up and configure your own choice of databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, or MongoDB. This gives developers more control and flexibility in selecting the most suitable database solution for their specific needs.
5. Serverless Computing: Firebase offers Cloud Functions, a serverless computing platform that allows you to run code in response to events triggered by Firebase features or HTTPS requests. This enables developers to build serverless architectures and focus on writing business logic rather than managing infrastructure. Linode, however, does not provide a serverless computing platform out of the box, and you need to implement it using other technologies or frameworks.
6. Platform Integration: Firebase is tightly integrated with other Google Cloud services, allowing seamless integration and easy access to a wide range of additional resources and services. This integration makes it easy to leverage other Google Cloud services like Cloud Storage, Cloud Functions, and machine learning APIs. Linode, being an independent platform, does not have the same level of integration with other cloud services, but provides more freedom to use a preferred service provider or different cloud components.
In Summary, Firebase is a cloud platform that offers a usage-based pricing model, built-in hosting, comprehensive backend services, and a real-time database, while Linode provides fixed pricing, more hosting customization, infrastructure-focused services, diverse database options, and the freedom to use other cloud service providers.
We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.
I would recommend looking hard into Firebase
for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.
The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore
. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.
Node.js
Express
MongoDB
Socket.IO
and Apollo
are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.
Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React
application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase
is a great way to do that.
Hello Noam 👋,
I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.
Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase
Hey Noam,
I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.
Thanks, Ilya
Chose Hetnzer over DigitalOcean and Linode because Hetzner provides much cheaper VPS with much better specs. DigitalOcean might seems like a good choice at first because of how popular it is. But in reality, if all you need is a simple VPS, you won't benefit much from the their oversubscribed datacenters which often underperform other competitors. Linode is also a good choice. They have cheaper options and performs slightly better than DigitalOcean. In the end, choosing a more affordable host helps you save money. That's important when you're running a tight ship.
Pros of Firebase
- Realtime backend made easy371
- Fast and responsive270
- Easy setup242
- Real-time215
- JSON191
- Free134
- Backed by google128
- Angular adaptor83
- Reliable68
- Great customer support36
- Great documentation32
- Real-time synchronization25
- Mobile friendly21
- Rapid prototyping19
- Great security14
- Automatic scaling12
- Freakingly awesome11
- Super fast development8
- Angularfire is an amazing addition!8
- Chat8
- Firebase hosting6
- Built in user auth/oauth6
- Awesome next-gen backend6
- Ios adaptor6
- Speed of light4
- Very easy to use4
- Great3
- It's made development super fast3
- Brilliant for startups3
- Free hosting2
- Cloud functions2
- JS Offline and Sync suport2
- Low battery consumption2
- .net2
- The concurrent updates create a great experience2
- Push notification2
- I can quickly create static web apps with no backend2
- Great all-round functionality2
- Free authentication solution2
- Easy Reactjs integration1
- Google's support1
- Free SSL1
- CDN & cache out of the box1
- Easy to use1
- Large1
- Faster workflow1
- Serverless1
- Good Free Limits1
- Simple and easy1
Pros of Linode
- Extremely reliable100
- Good value70
- Great customer support60
- Easy to configure58
- Great documentation37
- Servers across the world24
- Managed/hosted DNS service18
- Simple ui15
- Network and CPU usage graphs11
- IPv6 support7
- Multiple IP address support6
- Good price, good cusomter sevice3
- Ssh access3
- IP address fail over support2
- SSH root access2
- Great performance compared to EC2 or DO1
- It runs apps with speed1
- Best customizable VPS1
- Latest kernels1
- Cheapest1
- Ssds1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Firebase
- Can become expensive31
- No open source, you depend on external company16
- Scalability is not infinite15
- Not Flexible Enough9
- Cant filter queries7
- Very unstable server3
- No Relational Data3
- Too many errors2
- No offline sync2
Cons of Linode
- No "floating IP" support2