StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Apache Mesos vs Cloud Foundry

Apache Mesos vs Cloud Foundry

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Stacks188
Followers346
Votes5
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Stacks306
Followers418
Votes31
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.7K

Apache Mesos vs Cloud Foundry: What are the differences?

  1. Resource Management: Apache Mesos focuses on resource management and scheduling, allowing users to efficiently utilize shared resources across a cluster of machines. On the other hand, Cloud Foundry is more focused on application deployment and automation, providing a platform for developers to deploy their applications without needing to worry about underlying infrastructure.

  2. Flexibility vs. Abstraction: Apache Mesos provides a high level of flexibility by allowing users to choose and integrate different tools for specific functionalities. In contrast, Cloud Foundry abstracts away the underlying complexities of managing infrastructure, providing a more streamlined experience for developers.

  3. Scale and Extensibility: Apache Mesos is known for its scalability and extensibility, allowing users to scale their applications easily and integrate with a wide range of frameworks and tools. Cloud Foundry, while scalable, may have limitations in terms of customization and extensibility compared to Mesos.

  4. Container Orchestration: Apache Mesos has built-in support for container orchestration through frameworks like Marathon and Kubernetes, allowing users to run and manage containerized applications efficiently. Cloud Foundry also supports containerization but may have limitations in terms of advanced container management features compared to Mesos.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Apache Mesos has a strong open-source community and a wide ecosystem of tools and frameworks, making it a popular choice for organizations with diverse needs. Cloud Foundry also has a vibrant community, but its ecosystem may be more streamlined towards the specific use case of application deployment and management.

  6. Ease of Use: Cloud Foundry is known for its ease of use, providing a user-friendly interface and streamlined workflow for deploying applications. Apache Mesos, while powerful, may require more technical expertise and configuration to set up and manage effectively.

In Summary, Apache Mesos focuses on resource management and flexibility, while Cloud Foundry emphasizes application deployment and ease of use in a cloud environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos

Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
Fault-tolerant replicated master using ZooKeeper;Scalability to 10,000s of nodes;Isolation between tasks with Linux Containers;Multi-resource scheduling (memory and CPU aware);Java, Python and C++ APIs for developing new parallel applications;Web UI for viewing cluster state
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
188
Stacks
306
Followers
346
Followers
418
Votes
5
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Application health management
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
Pros
  • 21
    Easy scaling
  • 6
    Web UI
  • 2
    Fault-Tolerant
  • 1
    High-Available
  • 1
    Elastic Distributed System
Cons
  • 1
    Not for long term
  • 1
    Depends on Zookeeper
Integrations
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Logentries
Logentries
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Papertrail
Papertrail
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Splunk Cloud
Splunk Cloud
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Apache Aurora
Apache Aurora

What are some alternatives to Cloud Foundry, Apache Mesos?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot