Cloud Foundry vs Docker

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Cloud Foundry

Stacks188

Followers346

Votes5

Cloud Foundry vs Docker: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Cloud Foundry and Docker

Cloud Foundry and Docker are both popular technologies used in the world of cloud computing. However, there are several key differences between these two platforms that should be considered when choosing the right solution for your needs.

Architecture: Cloud Foundry is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) solution, offering a complete platform for developing, deploying, and scaling applications. On the other hand, Docker is a containerization technology that allows for the creation and deployment of lightweight, portable containers.
Abstraction Level: Cloud Foundry provides a higher level of abstraction compared to Docker. With Cloud Foundry, developers can focus on their application code without worrying about the underlying infrastructure, as the platform takes care of managing the infrastructure resources. Docker, on the other hand, provides a lower level of abstraction, allowing developers to have more control over the containerized applications and the infrastructure they are deployed on.
Application Portability: Cloud Foundry offers a high level of application portability. Applications developed on Cloud Foundry can be deployed and run on multiple cloud providers without any modifications. Docker also provides portability but requires the Docker runtime to be installed on the host machine where the containers are deployed.
Scaling: Cloud Foundry has built-in features for automatic application scaling. It can dynamically scale applications based on resource usage and demand. Docker, on the other hand, does not have built-in scaling capabilities. It requires additional tools or scripts to scale containers manually or programmatically.
Configuration Management: Cloud Foundry provides a declarative approach to configuration management. Developers can define the desired state of their applications using manifest files, specifying the required resources and dependencies. Docker, on the other hand, requires manual configuration using Dockerfiles or command-line options.
Ecosystem: Cloud Foundry has a vibrant ecosystem with a wide range of tools and services available for developers, including integrated databases, logging, and monitoring solutions. Docker also has a growing ecosystem, but it may require more effort to integrate and manage the various tools and services needed for running containerized applications.

In summary, Cloud Foundry provides a higher level of abstraction and a more comprehensive platform for developing and deploying applications, while Docker offers more flexibility and control over the containerized applications. The choice between Cloud Foundry and Docker depends on specific requirements, including the level of control, portability, and scalability needed for the applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Cloud Foundry

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Cloud Foundry
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
Statistics
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 188
Followers 143.8K	Followers 346
Votes 3.9K	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	Pros 2 Perfectly aligned with springboot 1 Free service discovery (Eureka) 1 Free distributed tracing (zipkin) 1 Application health management
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	VMware vSphere Logentries Amazon EC2 OpenStack Papertrail Amazon VPC Splunk Cloud Sumo Logic

What are some alternatives to Docker, Cloud Foundry?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Cloud Foundry vs Docker: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Cloud Foundry and Docker

Architecture: Cloud Foundry is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) solution, offering a complete platform for developing, deploying, and scaling applications. On the other hand, Docker is a containerization technology that allows for the creation and deployment of lightweight, portable containers.
Abstraction Level: Cloud Foundry provides a higher level of abstraction compared to Docker. With Cloud Foundry, developers can focus on their application code without worrying about the underlying infrastructure, as the platform takes care of managing the infrastructure resources. Docker, on the other hand, provides a lower level of abstraction, allowing developers to have more control over the containerized applications and the infrastructure they are deployed on.
Application Portability: Cloud Foundry offers a high level of application portability. Applications developed on Cloud Foundry can be deployed and run on multiple cloud providers without any modifications. Docker also provides portability but requires the Docker runtime to be installed on the host machine where the containers are deployed.
Scaling: Cloud Foundry has built-in features for automatic application scaling. It can dynamically scale applications based on resource usage and demand. Docker, on the other hand, does not have built-in scaling capabilities. It requires additional tools or scripts to scale containers manually or programmatically.
Configuration Management: Cloud Foundry provides a declarative approach to configuration management. Developers can define the desired state of their applications using manifest files, specifying the required resources and dependencies. Docker, on the other hand, requires manual configuration using Dockerfiles or command-line options.
Ecosystem: Cloud Foundry has a vibrant ecosystem with a wide range of tools and services available for developers, including integrated databases, logging, and monitoring solutions. Docker also has a growing ecosystem, but it may require more effort to integrate and manage the various tools and services needed for running containerized applications.

Cloud Foundry vs Docker

Overview

Cloud Foundry vs Docker: What are the differences?