CircleCI vs Harness.io

Overview

CircleCI

Stacks14.5K

Followers7.1K

Votes974

Harness.io

Stacks58

Followers120

Votes6

CircleCI vs Harness.io: What are the differences?

Introduction

CircleCI and Harness.io are both continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) platforms that help automate software development processes. While they have similar objectives, there are key differences in terms of features and capabilities.

Deployment Automation: CircleCI primarily focuses on continuous integration, which involves building and testing code changes. It provides the necessary tools and infrastructure to automate testing and deployment processes. On the other hand, Harness.io specializes in continuous delivery and deployment. It offers advanced features such as blue-green deployments, canary deployments, and rollbacks, which allow for seamless and controlled software releases.
Pipeline Orchestration: CircleCI defines build pipelines using configuration files and supports various programming languages and frameworks. It offers flexibility in terms of customizing the pipeline and integrating with other tools. Harness.io takes a different approach by providing a visual, drag-and-drop interface for defining deployment pipelines. This visual representation simplifies the process and makes it easier for non-technical team members to understand and contribute to the pipeline.
Native vs. Integration: CircleCI is a standalone CI/CD platform that integrates with other tools in your software development lifecycle. It provides support for popular version control systems, notification services, and deployment platforms. Harness.io, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive platform with built-in integrations for various tools commonly used in software development. It reduces the need for manual setup and configuration of integrations, saving time and effort.
Monitoring and Observability: While CircleCI provides basic monitoring and reporting capabilities, Harness.io goes a step further by offering built-in monitoring and observability features. It integrates with popular monitoring tools like Datadog and New Relic, allowing you to monitor the health and performance of your application during and after deployments. This comprehensive visibility into your deployment pipeline helps identify issues and bottlenecks.
Risk Mitigation: Harness.io emphasizes risk mitigation during the deployment process. It provides advanced features like deployment verification and rollback. Deployment verification ensures that the application is functioning correctly after the deployment, reducing the risk of faulty releases. In case of any issues, Harness.io allows for quick rollbacks to a stable version. CircleCI, while providing basic deployment capabilities, does not have the same level of built-in risk mitigation features.
Enterprise-Grade Support: Harness.io caters to enterprises and provides enterprise-grade support with 24/7 availability, fast response times, and dedicated customer success managers. CircleCI, on the other hand, offers support options but may not have the same level of dedicated enterprise support.

In summary, CircleCI focuses on continuous integration and provides powerful customization and integration capabilities. Harness.io takes a more comprehensive approach by offering advanced deployment features, visual pipeline orchestration, built-in integrations, monitoring, risk mitigation, and dedicated enterprise support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CircleCI, Harness.io

Dustin

Senior Developer at Elegant Themes

Apr 18, 2019

Reviewon

CircleCI

We use CircleCI because of the better value it provides in its plans. I'm sure we could have used Travis just as easily but we found CircleCI's pricing to be more reasonable. In the two years since we signed up, the service has improved. CircleCI is always innovating and iterating on their platform. We have been very satisfied.

607k views607k

Comments

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI	Harness.io
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.	It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.
Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights	ML-based Continuous Verification; Continuous Insights; Continuous Security; Advanced Deployment Strategies; Cloud & Container Cost Visibility; Cloud Cost Event Correlation; Detailed cost analysis without manual tagging
Statistics
Stacks 14.5K	Stacks 58
Followers 7.1K	Followers 120
Votes 974	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 226 Github integration 177 Easy setup 153 Fast builds 94 Competitively priced 74 Slack integration Cons 12 Unstable 6 Scammy pricing structure 0 Aggressive Github permissions	Pros 1 Autostopping rules for Kubernetes clusters 1 Cloud Cost Management 1 HIO monitor application health and help resolve issues 1 Feature Flags 1 Test Intelligence Cons 1 Cost grows quickly
Integrations
dotCloud GitHub Xcode Azure Container Service Slack Heroku JavaScript Node.js Python Amazon EC2	New Relic AWS CloudFormation Amazon CloudWatch Bugsnag Kubernetes Docker Sumo Logic Splunk Jenkins Datadog

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Harness.io?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

CircleCI vs Harness.io: What are the differences?

Introduction

Deployment Automation: CircleCI primarily focuses on continuous integration, which involves building and testing code changes. It provides the necessary tools and infrastructure to automate testing and deployment processes. On the other hand, Harness.io specializes in continuous delivery and deployment. It offers advanced features such as blue-green deployments, canary deployments, and rollbacks, which allow for seamless and controlled software releases.
Pipeline Orchestration: CircleCI defines build pipelines using configuration files and supports various programming languages and frameworks. It offers flexibility in terms of customizing the pipeline and integrating with other tools. Harness.io takes a different approach by providing a visual, drag-and-drop interface for defining deployment pipelines. This visual representation simplifies the process and makes it easier for non-technical team members to understand and contribute to the pipeline.
Native vs. Integration: CircleCI is a standalone CI/CD platform that integrates with other tools in your software development lifecycle. It provides support for popular version control systems, notification services, and deployment platforms. Harness.io, on the other hand, offers a more comprehensive platform with built-in integrations for various tools commonly used in software development. It reduces the need for manual setup and configuration of integrations, saving time and effort.
Monitoring and Observability: While CircleCI provides basic monitoring and reporting capabilities, Harness.io goes a step further by offering built-in monitoring and observability features. It integrates with popular monitoring tools like Datadog and New Relic, allowing you to monitor the health and performance of your application during and after deployments. This comprehensive visibility into your deployment pipeline helps identify issues and bottlenecks.
Risk Mitigation: Harness.io emphasizes risk mitigation during the deployment process. It provides advanced features like deployment verification and rollback. Deployment verification ensures that the application is functioning correctly after the deployment, reducing the risk of faulty releases. In case of any issues, Harness.io allows for quick rollbacks to a stable version. CircleCI, while providing basic deployment capabilities, does not have the same level of built-in risk mitigation features.
Enterprise-Grade Support: Harness.io caters to enterprises and provides enterprise-grade support with 24/7 availability, fast response times, and dedicated customer success managers. CircleCI, on the other hand, offers support options but may not have the same level of dedicated enterprise support.

CircleCI vs Harness.io

Overview

CircleCI vs Harness.io: What are the differences?