Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

2.1K
1.8K
+ 1
241
Cloud Foundry

188
344
+ 1
5
Add tool

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Cloud Foundry: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Cloud Foundry. Both these platforms are widely used for deploying and managing applications in the cloud. Understanding their differences will help in making an informed decision while choosing the right platform for your needs.

  1. Ease of Use: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides a more user-friendly interface and simpler deployment process compared to Cloud Foundry. Elastic Beanstalk automates many infrastructure management tasks, allowing developers to focus on their applications. On the other hand, Cloud Foundry requires more manual configuration and setup, making it more suitable for advanced users.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Elastic Beanstalk is specific to the AWS ecosystem and tightly integrated with other AWS services. It provides seamless integration with various AWS services such as Amazon RDS, Amazon S3, and Amazon EC2. In contrast, Cloud Foundry is an open-source platform that can run on a variety of infrastructure providers, including AWS, VMware, Google Cloud Platform, and Microsoft Azure. It offers more flexibility in terms of platform compatibility.

  3. Control and Customization: Elastic Beanstalk provides a managed environment where AWS handles most of the infrastructure management tasks. This limits the control and customization options available to the user. On the other hand, Cloud Foundry gives users more control over their deployment environment. It allows fine-grained configuration and customization options, enabling users to tailor the platform according to their specific requirements.

  4. Pricing Model: Elastic Beanstalk follows the pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the underlying AWS resources used by their application. This provides cost-efficiency and scalability, especially for smaller applications. Cloud Foundry, being an open-source platform, offers more flexibility in terms of pricing. Users can choose their own infrastructure provider and pricing model, depending on their preferences and budget.

  5. Community and Support: Elastic Beanstalk has strong community support and extensive documentation provided by AWS. It benefits from being a part of the larger AWS ecosystem, which provides a vast array of resources and support options. Cloud Foundry, being an open-source platform, also has a vibrant community and a wide range of support options. However, the level of support and available resources may vary depending on the infrastructure provider chosen by the user.

  6. Scalability and Availability: Elastic Beanstalk easily scales up or down based on the workload demands. It automatically handles infrastructure scaling and load balancing, ensuring high availability. Cloud Foundry also provides mechanisms for scaling and load balancing, but the configuration and management need to be done manually. Elastic Beanstalk offers a more seamless and automated approach to scalability and availability.

In summary, AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Cloud Foundry differ in terms of ease of use, platform compatibility, control and customization options, pricing model, community and support, and scalability.

Decisions about AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Cloud Foundry
Mehdi Baaboura
Managing Director at Gigadrive · | 7 upvotes · 11.5K views

Platform.sh has great out-of-the-box support for PHP apps (especially Symfony, as it was made by the same people). Elastic Beanstalk does not have a lot of compelling PaaS features like Platform.sh. There, you have to install a lot of PHP extensions manually for example, while Platform.sh just handles it for you based on your config. Elastic Beanstalk also has terrible version updates (see link).

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Pros of Cloud Foundry
  • 77
    Integrates with other aws services
  • 65
    Simple deployment
  • 44
    Fast
  • 28
    Painless
  • 16
    Free
  • 4
    Well-documented
  • 3
    Independend app container
  • 2
    Postgres hosting
  • 2
    Ability to be customized
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
  • 1
    Application health management
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Cons of Cloud Foundry
  • 2
    Charges appear automatically after exceeding free quota
  • 1
    Lots of moving parts and config
  • 0
    Slow deployments
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is AWS Elastic Beanstalk?

    Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

    What is Cloud Foundry?

    Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
    What companies use Cloud Foundry?
    See which teams inside your own company are using AWS Elastic Beanstalk or Cloud Foundry.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
    What tools integrate with Cloud Foundry?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    DockerAmazon EC2Scala+8
    6
    2710
    GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
    12
    6566
    What are some alternatives to AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Cloud Foundry?
    Google App Engine
    Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
    AWS CodeDeploy
    AWS CodeDeploy is a service that automates code deployments to Amazon EC2 instances. AWS CodeDeploy makes it easier for you to rapidly release new features, helps you avoid downtime during deployment, and handles the complexity of updating your applications.
    Docker
    The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
    AWS CloudFormation
    You can use AWS CloudFormation’s sample templates or create your own templates to describe the AWS resources, and any associated dependencies or runtime parameters, required to run your application. You don’t need to figure out the order in which AWS services need to be provisioned or the subtleties of how to make those dependencies work.
    Azure App Service
    Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.
    See all alternatives