AWS CodeBuild vs GitHub

Overview

GitHub

Stacks295.6K

Followers259.0K

Votes10.4K

AWS CodeBuild

Stacks443

Followers485

Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Introduction: AWS CodeBuild is a fully-managed continuous integration service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while GitHub is a web-based hosting service for version control using Git.

Pricing Model: One key difference between AWS CodeBuild and GitHub is their pricing model. CodeBuild follows a usage-based pricing model, where you only pay for the compute resources used during the build process. On the other hand, GitHub offers both free and paid plans based on the number of collaborators and private repositories, with pricing not directly tied to build usage.
Managed Service: AWS CodeBuild is a managed service offered by AWS, which means that AWS is responsible for managing the underlying infrastructure and ensuring the service's availability and scalability. GitHub, on the other hand, is primarily a code hosting platform and does not provide the same level of infrastructure management as CodeBuild.
Build Environment: AWS CodeBuild provides build environments that are isolated and customizable, allowing you to define specific requirements and configurations for individual builds. GitHub, on the other hand, does not have the same level of flexibility and control over the build environment, as it relies on third-party build systems or integrations.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, such as AWS CodePipeline for continuous delivery, AWS CodeCommit for source code management, and AWS CloudFormation for infrastructure provisioning. GitHub also offers integrations with various services, but the level of integration may not be as comprehensive as what is available within the AWS ecosystem.
Security and Authentication: AWS CodeBuild provides built-in security features and supports AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for fine-grained access control. GitHub also offers security features and supports authentication mechanisms, but the level of control and granularity may differ from what is available in AWS CodeBuild.
Scalability and Availability: AWS CodeBuild is designed to be highly scalable and available, allowing you to scale builds effortlessly and ensuring the service's reliability. GitHub, being primarily a code hosting platform, may have limitations in terms of scalability and availability when it comes to continuous integration and build processes.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild and GitHub differ in their pricing models, level of management, build environment customization, integrations with other services, security and authentication capabilities, and scalability and availability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitHub, AWS CodeBuild

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub	AWS CodeBuild
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.	AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.
Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions	Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
Stacks 295.6K	Stacks 443
Followers 259.0K	Followers 485
Votes 10.4K	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 1773 Open source friendly 1463 Easy source control 1254 Nice UI 1137 Great for team collaboration 868 Easy setup Cons 56 Owned by micrcosoft 38 Expensive for lone developers that want private repos 15 Relatively slow product/feature release cadence 10 API scoping could be better 9 Only 3 collaborators for private repos	Pros 7 Pay per minute 5 Parameter Store integration for passing secrets 4 Integrated with AWS 3 Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch 3 Bit bucket integration Cons 2 Poor branch support
Integrations
Grove Lighthouse Airbrake Codeship Bugsnag BugHerd Visual Studio Code HipChat CopperEgg Nitrous.IO	AWS Elastic Beanstalk AWS CodeCommit Amazon S3 Bitbucket AWS CloudFormation Jenkins GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to GitHub, AWS CodeBuild?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeBuild vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Introduction: AWS CodeBuild is a fully-managed continuous integration service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while GitHub is a web-based hosting service for version control using Git.

Pricing Model: One key difference between AWS CodeBuild and GitHub is their pricing model. CodeBuild follows a usage-based pricing model, where you only pay for the compute resources used during the build process. On the other hand, GitHub offers both free and paid plans based on the number of collaborators and private repositories, with pricing not directly tied to build usage.
Managed Service: AWS CodeBuild is a managed service offered by AWS, which means that AWS is responsible for managing the underlying infrastructure and ensuring the service's availability and scalability. GitHub, on the other hand, is primarily a code hosting platform and does not provide the same level of infrastructure management as CodeBuild.
Build Environment: AWS CodeBuild provides build environments that are isolated and customizable, allowing you to define specific requirements and configurations for individual builds. GitHub, on the other hand, does not have the same level of flexibility and control over the build environment, as it relies on third-party build systems or integrations.
Integration with AWS Services: AWS CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, such as AWS CodePipeline for continuous delivery, AWS CodeCommit for source code management, and AWS CloudFormation for infrastructure provisioning. GitHub also offers integrations with various services, but the level of integration may not be as comprehensive as what is available within the AWS ecosystem.
Security and Authentication: AWS CodeBuild provides built-in security features and supports AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for fine-grained access control. GitHub also offers security features and supports authentication mechanisms, but the level of control and granularity may differ from what is available in AWS CodeBuild.
Scalability and Availability: AWS CodeBuild is designed to be highly scalable and available, allowing you to scale builds effortlessly and ensuring the service's reliability. GitHub, being primarily a code hosting platform, may have limitations in terms of scalability and availability when it comes to continuous integration and build processes.

AWS CodeBuild vs GitHub

Overview