AWS CodeBuild vs Ansible

Overview

Ansible

Stacks19.5K

Followers15.6K

Votes1.3K

GitHub Stars66.9K

Forks24.1K

AWS CodeBuild

Stacks443

Followers485

Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs Ansible: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS CodeBuild and Ansible

Scalability: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service that can automatically scale based on the size and complexity of the build process, ensuring efficient resource utilization. On the other hand, Ansible is a configuration management tool that requires manual provisioning and scaling of infrastructure to support the deployment process.
Orchestration vs Automation: Ansible is primarily an automation tool that allows for the orchestration of tasks across multiple servers, making it suitable for complex, multi-node deployments. AWS CodeBuild, on the other hand, is more focused on the build and testing phases of the development cycle, providing a scalable and isolated environment for building software artifacts.
Integration with Other AWS Services: As an AWS service, CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like Amazon S3, AWS CodeCommit, and AWS CodePipeline. This makes it easy to incorporate CodeBuild into a comprehensive CI/CD pipeline on the AWS cloud infrastructure. In contrast, Ansible can also integrate with AWS services, but it requires additional configuration and setup to establish the integrations.
Managed vs Self-Managed: AWS CodeBuild is a managed service where AWS takes care of infrastructure provisioning, security, and maintenance, allowing developers to focus solely on their build process. Ansible, on the other hand, is a self-managed tool that requires manual handling of infrastructure and security aspects.
Technology Stack: Ansible is an agentless tool that connects to remote servers using SSH, making it compatible with various operating systems and infrastructure setups. In contrast, AWS CodeBuild uses Docker images to provide a customizable build environment, allowing developers to use the desired set of tools and dependencies.
Cost and Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the time it takes to complete their builds and the resources utilized. Ansible, on the other hand, is an open-source tool with no direct cost, but users are responsible for the infrastructure cost, maintenance, and setup required for running Ansible.

In summary, AWS CodeBuild offers scalability, integration with other AWS services, and a managed infrastructure, while Ansible focuses on automation, compatibility with various systems, and gives users greater control over their infrastructure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Ansible, AWS CodeBuild

Anonymous

Sep 17, 2019

Needs advice

I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)

I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.

The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.

329k views329k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ansible	AWS CodeBuild
Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.	AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.
Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.;Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere. Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate "managing the management", and reclaim CPU cycles.;Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.	Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
GitHub Stars 66.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 24.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 19.5K	Stacks 443
Followers 15.6K	Followers 485
Votes 1.3K	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 284 Agentless 210 Great configuration 199 Simple 176 Powerful 155 Easy to learn Cons 8 Dangerous 5 Hard to install 3 Bloated 3 Doesn't Run on Windows 3 Backward compatibility	Pros 7 Pay per minute 5 Parameter Store integration for passing secrets 4 Integrated with AWS 3 Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch 3 Bit bucket integration Cons 2 Poor branch support
Integrations
Nexmo Stackdriver VMware vSphere Docker OpenStack Amazon EC2 Rackspace Cloud Servers Google Compute Engine New Relic PagerDuty	AWS Elastic Beanstalk AWS CodeCommit Amazon S3 GitHub Bitbucket AWS CloudFormation Jenkins GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to Ansible, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Related Comparisons

AWS CodeBuild vs Ansible: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS CodeBuild and Ansible

Scalability: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service that can automatically scale based on the size and complexity of the build process, ensuring efficient resource utilization. On the other hand, Ansible is a configuration management tool that requires manual provisioning and scaling of infrastructure to support the deployment process.
Orchestration vs Automation: Ansible is primarily an automation tool that allows for the orchestration of tasks across multiple servers, making it suitable for complex, multi-node deployments. AWS CodeBuild, on the other hand, is more focused on the build and testing phases of the development cycle, providing a scalable and isolated environment for building software artifacts.
Integration with Other AWS Services: As an AWS service, CodeBuild seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like Amazon S3, AWS CodeCommit, and AWS CodePipeline. This makes it easy to incorporate CodeBuild into a comprehensive CI/CD pipeline on the AWS cloud infrastructure. In contrast, Ansible can also integrate with AWS services, but it requires additional configuration and setup to establish the integrations.
Managed vs Self-Managed: AWS CodeBuild is a managed service where AWS takes care of infrastructure provisioning, security, and maintenance, allowing developers to focus solely on their build process. Ansible, on the other hand, is a self-managed tool that requires manual handling of infrastructure and security aspects.
Technology Stack: Ansible is an agentless tool that connects to remote servers using SSH, making it compatible with various operating systems and infrastructure setups. In contrast, AWS CodeBuild uses Docker images to provide a customizable build environment, allowing developers to use the desired set of tools and dependencies.
Cost and Pricing Model: AWS CodeBuild follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the time it takes to complete their builds and the resources utilized. Ansible, on the other hand, is an open-source tool with no direct cost, but users are responsible for the infrastructure cost, maintenance, and setup required for running Ansible.

AWS CodeBuild vs Ansible

Overview

AWS CodeBuild vs Ansible: What are the differences?