StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Messaging
  4. Group Chat And Notifications
  5. Ripcord vs Slack

Ripcord vs Slack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Slack
Slack
Stacks120.8K
Followers97.7K
Votes6.0K
Ripcord
Ripcord
Stacks11
Followers17
Votes11

Ripcord vs Slack: What are the differences?

Introduction: Ripcord and Slack are both collaboration platforms used for team communication and productivity. While they have similar goals, there are significant differences in their features and functionality.

  1. Interface: Ripcord offers a streamlined and minimalistic interface, with a focus on efficient communication. It utilizes a traditional chat format with a single timeline, making it easy to follow conversations. In contrast, Slack provides a more visually appealing interface with multiple channels and options for customization, allowing users to organize conversations and notifications based on their preferences.

  2. Customization: Ripcord has limited customization options, offering a simple and straightforward experience. Although it provides features like dark mode and font adjustments, it lacks the extensive customization capabilities of Slack. Slack allows users to personalize their workspace with themes, custom emojis, and integrations, enabling teams to create a more tailored and personalized environment.

  3. File Sharing: Slack is known for its seamless file-sharing capabilities, allowing users to easily upload, preview, and collaborate on various file types. It supports integrations with popular cloud storage platforms like Google Drive and Dropbox. While Ripcord does offer file sharing functionality, it is comparatively basic and lacks the advanced collaboration features provided by Slack.

  4. Integrations: Slack has a vast library of integrations with third-party applications, enabling seamless workflows and task management. It allows users to connect with various tools like project management apps, CRM systems, and email clients, enhancing productivity and collaboration across different platforms. Ripcord, on the other hand, has limited integration options and primarily focuses on core communication features.

  5. Price: Slack offers both free and paid versions, with the free version providing limited message history and storage capacity. Paid plans come with additional features, including advanced search functionality and unlimited integrations. Ripcord, on the other hand, is entirely free to use, making it a cost-effective option for teams on a strict budget.

  6. Availability: Slack is available on multiple platforms, including web, desktop applications, and mobile apps for iOS and Android. It provides a consistent experience across devices, allowing users to access their workspace from anywhere. Ripcord, however, is primarily designed as a desktop application and has limited availability on mobile devices.

In summary, Ripcord offers a simplified and minimalist approach to team communication, while Slack provides a more robust and customizable workspace with advanced features. Slack's extensive integration options, file-sharing capabilities, and accessibility make it a versatile tool for teams seeking a comprehensive collaboration platform.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Slack, Ripcord

Remotor
Remotor

Apr 13, 2020

Decided

Keybase is a powerful and secure team-organizing software. And because Keybase is so transparently good at what it does, Keybase is a foundational software that facilitates the future of work: effective, inclusive, secure Remote Teams.

Keybase is a free, end-to-end encrypted, open-source program with almost limitless flexibility. Each Keybase user or team is a unique cryptographic identity. Each message or interaction that a user has with a team or other user, is verifiable and digitally-signed. Custom combinations of users/teams/bots, can be designed to catalyze Remote Teams of all kinds, this process can also be automated. Keybase includes Git integration for versioning, bots from multiple platforms to facilitate audio/video-conferencing, a Cryptocurrency wallet, and many advanced privacy features to make you more or less traceable.

Services like Slack and Discord are centralized platforms that perform analytics on your behavior and can sell or leak this data to 3rd parties. Any audio/video features available within Slack or Discord, are bound to be less secure and less flexible than excellent alternatives such as Jitsi. Slack and Discord do have a fun, causal feel to them, which can potentially facilitate social engagement in certain conditions (also many users are already on these platforms).

Centralized and Proprietary team platforms such as Discord and Slack have a large market presence (at least in the USA) based on their first-mover advantage, name recognition, and network effects from size. However these products do not have the flexibility or power of Keybase. Keybase excels on its own excellence, and also has an open and active developer community.

Find us on Keybase: @remotorteam (Keybase username) @remotor.public (Public Keybase Team)

132k views132k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 24, 2019

Needs adviceonGitterGitterDiscordDiscordSpectrumSpectrum

From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."

1.32M views1.32M
Comments
Stefan
Stefan

CEO / CTO at DROOM! #wirmachenweb #vienna

Feb 10, 2020

Decided

We chose RocketChat over other communications suites like Cliq or Slack mainly because we can self-host it on our own infrastructure. Since we have quite some projects going on which demand that we stay in touch with a lot of different stakeholders, pricing was an issue, too. With RocketChat, we have a huge set of features basically for free, RC offers apps for all major devices and systems and overall, we're very happy with it. The only downside is the limited amount of apps and integrations, but we can make due with what we have available.

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Slack
Slack
Ripcord
Ripcord

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

A desktop chat client for group-centric services like Slack and Discord. It provides a traditional compact desktop interface designed for power users.

Create open channels for the projects, groups and topics that the whole team shares.;Search with context;Autocomplete makes mentioning your teammates quick and painless.;Configurable notifications for desktop, mobile push and email keep you as informed as you’d like.;Everything is perfectly in sync as you move between your desktop, iPhone, iPad, or Android device.;Powerful search & archiving means you can forget when you need to: we’ll remember for you.;Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub Integration;Add comments for feedback & stars for easy retrieval;Built-in internal and external sharing options ensure you can get and share any file with anyone
Custom bookmark lists; Customizable fonts, colors, and sizes; Variable DPI and multi-monitor support; Low CPU and memory usage; Zero GPU usage; No tracking or analytics; Tabs; Multiple windows; Multiple accounts; Voice chat; Graphical emoji (including custom emoji); Tab completion for user names and emoji; Powerful batch editing
Statistics
Stacks
120.8K
Stacks
11
Followers
97.7K
Followers
17
Votes
6.0K
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1209
    Easy to integrate with
  • 876
    Excellent interface on multiple platforms
  • 849
    Free
  • 694
    Mobile friendly
  • 690
    People really enjoy using it
Cons
  • 13
    Can be distracting depending on how you use it
  • 6
    Requires some management for large teams
  • 6
    Limit messages history
  • 5
    Too expensive
  • 5
    You don't really own your messages
Pros
  • 1
    Multiple accounts
  • 1
    Works with both Discord and Slack
  • 1
    Customizable fonts, colors, and sizes
  • 1
    Traditional and compact
  • 1
    Tabs
Cons
  • 1
    Antiquated user interface (this can be a pro or a con)
  • 1
    Illegal according to the Policy of Discord
  • 1
    Little confusing for newbies
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Zapier
Zapier
Stripe
Stripe
Asana
Asana
GoSquared
GoSquared
Dropbox
Dropbox
New Relic
New Relic
Google Drive
Google Drive
Zendesk
Zendesk
Discord
Discord

What are some alternatives to Slack, Ripcord?

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack