Pivotal Tracker vs Trello: What are the differences?

## Key differences between Pivotal Tracker and Trello

Pivotal Tracker and Trello are two popular project management tools that offer different features and functionalities. Here are some key differences between the two:

1. **User Interface**: Pivotal Tracker has a more structured and detailed interface, focused on Agile development practices, while Trello offers a more visually appealing and flexible Kanban board layout.
2. **Workflow Automation**: Pivotal Tracker provides built-in automation features like story prioritization and velocity tracking, whereas Trello relies on third-party integrations like Butler for workflow automation.
3. **Reporting and Analytics**: Pivotal Tracker offers robust reporting capabilities including burndown charts and velocity reports, whereas Trello's reporting features are limited and usually require Power-Ups for advanced analytics.
4. **Collaboration Tools**: Trello excels in collaboration with features like comments, file attachments, and team-wide communication boards, while Pivotal Tracker focuses more on task management and progress tracking within the team.
5. **Customization Options**: Trello allows for extensive customization options with Power-Ups and custom fields, enabling users to tailor their boards to specific workflows, whereas Pivotal Tracker has a more rigid structure with fewer customization choices.
6. **Price**: Pivotal Tracker offers a free plan for small teams and startups, with affordable pricing tiers for larger organizations, while Trello offers a freemium model with limited features in the free version and various pricing plans with additional features for paid users.

In Summary, Pivotal Tracker and Trello differ in user interface design, workflow automation, reporting capabilities, collaboration tools, customization options, and pricing models.