Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Next.js vs Yew Framework: What are the differences?
Introduction
Next.js and Yew Framework are both web development tools that offer different sets of features and functionality. Understanding their key differences is important for developers to choose the right tool for their projects.
Server-side Rendering (SSR) Support: Next.js is a framework built on top of React that provides built-in server-side rendering support. This means that Next.js can render web pages on the server and send them as fully-rendered HTML to the client, resulting in faster page loads and better SEO. Yew Framework, on the other hand, is a modern Rust framework for creating web applications, but it does not have built-in server-side rendering support.
Language: Next.js is written in JavaScript and supports both client-side and server-side JavaScript development. Yew Framework, on the other hand, is written in Rust, a systems programming language known for its speed and memory safety. This difference in programming language can affect developer productivity and the features available in each framework.
Build Time Execution: Next.js allows developers to execute code during build time, which means developers can fetch data or perform other operations before deploying the application. This feature can be useful for pre-rendering static pages or optimizing performance. Yew Framework does not have built-in support for executing code during build time, and any server-side operations need to be performed at runtime.
Size and Performance: Next.js, being built on top of React, introduces an additional layer of abstraction and dependencies, which can impact the bundle size and performance of the application. Yew Framework, being a Rust-based framework, has a smaller bundle size and can leverage the performance benefits of the Rust language. This can be particularly advantageous for applications that prioritize efficient resource usage and fast response times.
Ecosystem and Community: Next.js benefits from the large and active React ecosystem and community. There are numerous resources, libraries, and tools available for developers to leverage when working with Next.js. Yew Framework, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller ecosystem and community compared to Next.js. This can affect availability of documentation, community support, and third-party libraries for Yew Framework.
Development Workflow: Next.js provides a comprehensive development workflow with features like hot module replacement, automatic code splitting, and built-in support for CSS modules. Yew Framework, being built on Rust, brings with it the benefits of the Rust ecosystem, such as strong static typing, efficient memory management, and a powerful package manager (Cargo). This can result in a different development experience and workflow compared to Next.js.
In Summary, Next.js offers built-in server-side rendering support, is written in JavaScript, has build time execution capabilities, and benefits from a larger ecosystem and community. On the other hand, Yew Framework is a Rust-based framework, has a smaller bundle size and better performance, and leverages the benefits of Rust's language features and tooling.
We choose Next.js for our React framework because it's very minimal and has a very organized file structure. Also, it offers key features like zero setups, automatic server rendering and code splitting, typescript support. Our app requires some loading time to process the video, server-side rendering will allow our website to display faster than client-side rending.
We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.
You can read all about it in our linked blog post.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting49
- Built with React43
- Easy setup33
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Well Documented9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Pros of Yew Framework
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9