StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Performance Monitoring
  4. Performance Monitoring
  5. New Relic vs Vector

New Relic vs Vector

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

New Relic
New Relic
Stacks22.7K
Followers8.7K
Votes1.9K
Vector
Vector
Stacks22
Followers53
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.6K
Forks250

New Relic vs Vector: What are the differences?

Introduction

In comparing New Relic and Vector, it is important to highlight the key differences between these two tools used for monitoring and observability purposes.

  1. Data Collection Methodology: New Relic primarily collects data through an agent-based approach, where agents are required to be installed on each host to gather data. On the other hand, Vector utilizes an agentless approach, collecting data through a lightweight and efficient Vector binary, reducing the overall resource usage and maintenance overhead.

  2. Customizability and Extensibility: New Relic offers a wide range of out-of-the-box integrations and functionality but has limited customizability and extensibility options. In contrast, Vector provides a high level of customization and extensibility through its powerful scripting capabilities, allowing users to tailor their monitoring and observability setups according to specific requirements.

  3. Open Source vs Proprietary: New Relic is a proprietary monitoring tool with limited access to its source code, while Vector is an open-source project, enabling users to contribute to the development, review the code, and modify it as needed, promoting transparency and community involvement.

  4. Pricing Model: New Relic operates on a subscription-based pricing model, which can become costly based on the volume of data being monitored. Conversely, Vector is cost-effective as it is open source and provides various deployment options, allowing users to manage expenses more efficiently depending on their specific needs.

  5. Scalability and Performance: New Relic may face scalability limitations in large-scale environments due to its implementation of agent-based data collection. Vector, with its agentless approach, offers better scalability and performance, efficiently handling high volumes of data without significant overhead or performance issues.

  6. Data Security and Privacy: New Relic may raise concerns regarding data security and privacy due to its proprietary nature, potentially limiting the level of control users have over their data. In contrast, Vector's open-source nature provides greater transparency and control over data handling processes, addressing potential security and privacy considerations more effectively.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between New Relic and Vector in terms of data collection methodology, customizability, openness, pricing, scalability, and security is essential in choosing the most suitable monitoring and observability tool for specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on New Relic, Vector

Medeti
Medeti

Jun 27, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon EKSAmazon EKSKubernetesKubernetesAWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

1.51M views1.51M
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 17, 2019

Decided

I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).

The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight

NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon

457k views457k
Comments
Attila
Attila

Founder at artkonekt

Mar 24, 2020

Decided

I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.

In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.

The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:

  • The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
  • The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
  • The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
  • The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
  • The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.

Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.

471k views471k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

New Relic
New Relic
Vector
Vector

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Vector provides a simple way for users to visualize and analyze system and application-level metrics in near real-time. It leverages the battle tested open source system monitoring framework, Performance Co-Pilot (PCP), layering on top a flexible and user-friendly UI. The UI polls metrics at up to 1 second resolution, rendering the data in completely configurable dashboards that simplify cross-metric correlation and analysis.

Performance Data Retention;Real-User Response Time, Throughput, & Breakdown by Layer;App Response Time, Throughput, & Breakdown by Component;App Availability Monitoring, Alerting, and Notification;Automatic Application Topology Mapping;Server Resource and Availability Monitoring;Error Detection, Alerting, & Analysis;JVM Performance Analyzer;Database Call Response Time & Throughput;Performance Data API Access;Code Level Diagnostics, Transaction Tracing, & Stack Trace Details;Slow SQL and SQL Performance Details;Real-User Breakdown by Web Page, Browser, & Geography;Track Individual Key Transactions;Mobile Features- Alerting, Summary Data, Overview Page, Topo Map, HTTP Requests, HTTP Error Summary, HTTP Error Detail, Versions, Carriers, Devices, Geo Map
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
250
Stacks
22.7K
Stacks
22
Followers
8.7K
Followers
53
Votes
1.9K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 414
    Easy setup
  • 344
    Really powerful
  • 245
    Awesome visualization
  • 194
    Ease of use
  • 151
    Great ui
Cons
  • 20
    Pricing model doesn't suit microservices
  • 10
    UI isn't great
  • 7
    Visualizations aren't very helpful
  • 7
    Expensive
  • 5
    Hard to understand why things in your app are breaking
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AppHarbor
AppHarbor
Cloudability
Cloudability
HP Cloud Compute
HP Cloud Compute
cloudControl
cloudControl
Papertrail
Papertrail
Loggly
Loggly
Ducksboard
Ducksboard
Blitz
Blitz
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to New Relic, Vector?

Datadog

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Raygun

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Stackify

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Skylight

Skylight

Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.

Librato

Librato

Librato provides a complete solution for monitoring and understanding the metrics that impact your business at all levels of the stack. We provide everything you need to visualize, analyze, and actively alert on the metrics that matter to you.

Keymetrics

Keymetrics

PM2 is a production process manager for Node.js applications with a built-in load balancer. It allows you to keep applications alive forever, to reload them without downtime and to facilitate common system admin tasks.

Dynatrace

Dynatrace

It is an AI-powered, full stack, automated performance management solution. It provides user experience analysis that identifies and resolves application performance issues faster than ever before.

SignalFx

SignalFx

We provide operational intelligence for today’s elastic architectures through monitoring specifically designed for microservices and containers with: -powerful and proactive alerting -metrics aggregation -visualization into time series data

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana