Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Mattermost

482
578
+ 1
302
Zulip

220
342
+ 1
362
Add tool

Mattermost vs Zulip: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Mattermost and Zulip are both team communication platforms with various features designed to improve collaboration within organizations. Despite having some similarities, there are several key differences between the two platforms.

  1. Deployment Options: Mattermost offers flexible deployment options, allowing users to choose between using Mattermost's cloud hosting service or hosting it on their own infrastructure. On the other hand, Zulip primarily focuses on self-hosted deployments, providing less emphasis on cloud hosting.

  2. Conversation Structure: Mattermost uses a channel-based conversation structure similar to popular platforms like Slack, where users communicate in channels dedicated to specific topics or teams. In contrast, Zulip has a unique topic-based conversation structure, organizing conversations around specific topics and providing a more organized and streamlined communication flow.

  3. Threaded Conversations: Zulip offers robust threaded conversations, allowing users to reply to a specific message within a conversation, keeping discussions focused and reducing noise. Mattermost, in comparison, provides basic threading capabilities, where replies are not as easily distinguishable from the main conversation.

  4. Wide Range of Integrations: Mattermost boasts a vast array of integrations with popular third-party tools and services, allowing users to connect and automate processes seamlessly. Zulip supports integrations as well, but its selection is relatively smaller compared to Mattermost.

  5. Pricing Model: Mattermost adopts a freemium pricing model, where users can utilize a limited set of features for free with the option to upgrade for additional functionality and advanced features. Conversely, Zulip follows an open-source model, providing its complete set of features for free without any subscription charges.

  6. User Interface: Mattermost offers a more familiar and visually appealing user interface, resembling other popular team communication platforms. Zulip, on the other hand, has a distinct look and feel, with a multi-column layout that may require some adaptation for users accustomed to more traditional interfaces.

In Summary, Mattermost provides flexible deployment options, a channel-based conversation structure, basic threading, extensive integrations, follows a freemium pricing model, and has a more familiar user interface. Zulip primarily focuses on self-hosted deployments, utilizes a topic-based conversation structure, offers robust threaded conversations, has a smaller range of integrations, follows an open-source pricing model, and has a distinct user interface.

Decisions about Mattermost and Zulip
Christopher Semmler

Mattermost sports higher performance, uses Postgres, is a pure server side application not using up too much of system resources on the client side, and gives an overall enterprise grade impression in general.

Updates go smooth without a hassle, everything is organised logically, and the integration with the OS is absolutely stable. Apart from that, the underlying runtimes and code are mature, proven and stable.

The developers are maybe a bit more cautious in regard to introducing new features, but they maintain a stable experience, not breaking the codebase in order to hastily implement bells and whistles, which are not yet ready for production. Documentation and debugging are fantastic, so running this in enterprise production environment is absolutely approved of.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Mattermost
Pros of Zulip
  • 60
    Open source
  • 41
    On-premise deployment
  • 26
    Free
  • 22
    Built using golang
  • 21
    Fast and easy to use
  • 14
    Docker image provided for easy setup
  • 14
    Full text search
  • 12
    Built using react
  • 11
    Supports multiple teams
  • 11
    Search and data archiving
  • 11
    Very professional
  • 8
    Keeps us focused, effective, concise
  • 7
    Clean and simple look
  • 7
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 7
    Webhooks support
  • 6
    Well documented
  • 6
    Use #Hashtags like Twitter
  • 3
    Import Slack logs
  • 3
    Reactive community and ease of use
  • 2
    Self managed data
  • 2
    On-premises Deployment
  • 2
    Secure
  • 1
    Markdown support
  • 1
    On premise installation
  • 1
    Kanban
  • 1
    Checklists
  • 1
    Slack-compatible integrations
  • 1
    Easy webhook integration
  • 64
    Open source
  • 48
    Great Community
  • 40
    Extensive developer documentation
  • 38
    Powered by Python
  • 34
    Clean & Smooth UI
  • 26
    Full text search
  • 25
    Dozens of integrations
  • 24
    Threading model
  • 21
    On-premise deployment
  • 16
    Fully internationalized
  • 12
    Cross-platform (Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android)
  • 4
    Its very good forsearching and chatting with topics
  • 3
    Awesome open source alternative to Slack
  • 3
    Runs very well
  • 2
    Very Nice
  • 1
    Mobile Push Notification
  • 1
    LDAP Integration

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Mattermost
Cons of Zulip
  • 2
    Less integrations and plugins than slack
  • 2
    Many basic features are enterprise only
  • 2
    Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise
  • 1
    Basic permissions only in enterprise edition
  • 1
    Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB
  • 1
    Integration with most of well known services
  • 0
    The interface require a lot of overhaul

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Mattermost?

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

What is Zulip?

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Mattermost?
What companies use Zulip?
See which teams inside your own company are using Mattermost or Zulip.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Mattermost?
What tools integrate with Zulip?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Mattermost and Zulip?
Slack
Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.
RocketChat
Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.
Riot
Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.
HipChat
HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.
Gitter
Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.
See all alternatives