Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Kubernetes

61K
52.7K
+ 1
685
Platform.sh

21
58
+ 1
0
Add tool

Kubernetes vs Platform.sh: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between Kubernetes and Platform.sh. Both Kubernetes and Platform.sh are popular tools used for managing and deploying applications, but they have distinct features and functionalities.

  1. Scalability: Kubernetes is a highly scalable container orchestration platform that can manage thousands of containers in a cluster. It allows automatic scaling of applications based on resource utilization. Platform.sh, on the other hand, is a cloud-based platform that provides a fully managed environment for hosting applications. It offers scalability by automatically scaling the underlying infrastructure based on the workload of the applications.

  2. Ease of use: Kubernetes has a steeper learning curve compared to Platform.sh. It requires a good understanding of containerization concepts and requires manual configuration and management of resources. On the other hand, Platform.sh provides a user-friendly interface and simplifies the deployment and management of applications. It abstracts away the infrastructure details and allows developers to focus on coding.

  3. Managed services: Platform.sh provides a comprehensive set of managed services for hosting applications, including databases, caching, and search services. These services are seamlessly integrated and can be easily provisioned and managed from the platform. Kubernetes, on the other hand, does not provide built-in managed services. Users need to manually set up and manage these services or rely on external providers.

  4. Deployment flexibility: Kubernetes offers the flexibility to deploy applications on any infrastructure, including public clouds, private clouds, and on-premises data centers. It supports multi-cloud and hybrid cloud deployments. Platform.sh is a cloud-native platform that is built specifically for deploying applications in the cloud. It does not provide the option to deploy on-premises or in private clouds.

  5. Monitoring and Logging: Kubernetes provides basic monitoring and logging capabilities out of the box, but it requires additional tools and configurations for advanced monitoring and logging. Platform.sh provides built-in monitoring and logging features, allowing users to easily monitor the health and performance of applications. It integrates with popular monitoring and logging tools for advanced analytics and insights.

  6. Deployment management: Kubernetes provides fine-grained control over application deployment and management. It allows rolling updates, versioning, and rollback features. Platform.sh simplifies deployment management by automatically handling application updates and rollbacks. It utilizes a Git-based workflow, allowing developers to easily revert to previous versions and promote changes to production.

In summary, Kubernetes is a powerful container orchestration platform that offers scalability and deployment flexibility but requires more manual configuration and management. Platform.sh, on the other hand, provides a user-friendly interface, built-in managed services, and automated deployment management, making it easier for developers to deploy and manage applications in the cloud.

Decisions about Kubernetes and Platform.sh
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 12.7M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Kubernetes
Pros of Platform.sh
  • 166
    Leading docker container management solution
  • 130
    Simple and powerful
  • 108
    Open source
  • 76
    Backed by google
  • 58
    The right abstractions
  • 26
    Scale services
  • 20
    Replication controller
  • 11
    Permission managment
  • 9
    Supports autoscaling
  • 8
    Cheap
  • 8
    Simple
  • 7
    Self-healing
  • 5
    Open, powerful, stable
  • 5
    Promotes modern/good infrascture practice
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 5
    No cloud platform lock-in
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Quick cloud setup
  • 3
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 3
    Custom and extensibility
  • 3
    A self healing environment with rich metadata
  • 3
    Captain of Container Ship
  • 3
    Backed by Red Hat
  • 3
    Runs on azure
  • 2
    Expandable
  • 2
    Sfg
  • 2
    Everything of CaaS
  • 2
    Gke
  • 2
    Golang
  • 2
    Easy setup
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Kubernetes
    Cons of Platform.sh
    • 16
      Steep learning curve
    • 15
      Poor workflow for development
    • 8
      Orchestrates only infrastructure
    • 4
      High resource requirements for on-prem clusters
    • 2
      Too heavy for simple systems
    • 1
      Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)
    • 1
      More moving parts to secure
    • 1
      Additional Technology Overhead
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Kubernetes?

      Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

      What is Platform.sh?

      It is a Continuous Deployment Platform as a Service powered by a high-availability grid of micro-containers. Support any PHP and NodeJS applications with deep integration for Drupal and Symfony.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Kubernetes?
      What companies use Platform.sh?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Kubernetes?
      What tools integrate with Platform.sh?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Kubernetesetcd+2
      2
      1258
      Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

      DigitalOcean

      GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
      2
      2543
      PythonDockerKubernetes+7
      3
      1234
      May 21 2020 at 12:02AM

      Rancher Labs

      KubernetesAmazon EC2Grafana+12
      5
      1605
      Apr 16 2020 at 5:34AM

      Rancher Labs

      KubernetesRancher+2
      2
      1029
      What are some alternatives to Kubernetes and Platform.sh?
      Docker Swarm
      Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.
      Nomad
      Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.
      OpenStack
      OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.
      Rancher
      Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
      Docker Compose
      With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
      See all alternatives