Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kubernetes vs Platform.sh: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will compare the key differences between Kubernetes and Platform.sh. Both Kubernetes and Platform.sh are popular tools used for managing and deploying applications, but they have distinct features and functionalities.
Scalability: Kubernetes is a highly scalable container orchestration platform that can manage thousands of containers in a cluster. It allows automatic scaling of applications based on resource utilization. Platform.sh, on the other hand, is a cloud-based platform that provides a fully managed environment for hosting applications. It offers scalability by automatically scaling the underlying infrastructure based on the workload of the applications.
Ease of use: Kubernetes has a steeper learning curve compared to Platform.sh. It requires a good understanding of containerization concepts and requires manual configuration and management of resources. On the other hand, Platform.sh provides a user-friendly interface and simplifies the deployment and management of applications. It abstracts away the infrastructure details and allows developers to focus on coding.
Managed services: Platform.sh provides a comprehensive set of managed services for hosting applications, including databases, caching, and search services. These services are seamlessly integrated and can be easily provisioned and managed from the platform. Kubernetes, on the other hand, does not provide built-in managed services. Users need to manually set up and manage these services or rely on external providers.
Deployment flexibility: Kubernetes offers the flexibility to deploy applications on any infrastructure, including public clouds, private clouds, and on-premises data centers. It supports multi-cloud and hybrid cloud deployments. Platform.sh is a cloud-native platform that is built specifically for deploying applications in the cloud. It does not provide the option to deploy on-premises or in private clouds.
Monitoring and Logging: Kubernetes provides basic monitoring and logging capabilities out of the box, but it requires additional tools and configurations for advanced monitoring and logging. Platform.sh provides built-in monitoring and logging features, allowing users to easily monitor the health and performance of applications. It integrates with popular monitoring and logging tools for advanced analytics and insights.
Deployment management: Kubernetes provides fine-grained control over application deployment and management. It allows rolling updates, versioning, and rollback features. Platform.sh simplifies deployment management by automatically handling application updates and rollbacks. It utilizes a Git-based workflow, allowing developers to easily revert to previous versions and promote changes to production.
In summary, Kubernetes is a powerful container orchestration platform that offers scalability and deployment flexibility but requires more manual configuration and management. Platform.sh, on the other hand, provides a user-friendly interface, built-in managed services, and automated deployment management, making it easier for developers to deploy and manage applications in the cloud.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful130
- Open source108
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services26
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Cheap8
- Simple8
- Self-healing7
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Custom and extensibility3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
Pros of Platform.sh
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1