StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Kafka vs StreamSets

Kafka vs StreamSets

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Kafka
Kafka
Stacks24.2K
Followers22.3K
Votes607
GitHub Stars31.2K
Forks14.8K
StreamSets
StreamSets
Stacks53
Followers133
Votes0

Kafka vs StreamSets: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between Kafka and StreamSets in a concise and specific manner. Kafka and StreamSets are both popular tools used in data processing and streaming applications. Here, we will highlight six key differences between these two technologies.

  1. Architecture: Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that follows a publish-subscribe model. It utilizes a distributed commit log to provide fault-tolerant storage and enables high-throughput, low-latency messaging. On the other hand, StreamSets is a data integration platform that focuses on data ingestion, transformation, and delivery. It offers a visual development environment to define data pipelines and supports code-free development.

  2. Functionality: Kafka is primarily designed to handle real-time streaming data by providing publish-subscribe messaging, durability, fault-tolerance, and scalability. It offers features like retention, replication, and stream processing through Kafka Streams or third-party tools. StreamSets, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive set of data integration capabilities including data ingestion from various sources, data transformation using a rich set of processors, and data delivery to multiple destinations. It also supports change data capture, error handling, and data drift handling.

  3. Ease of Use: Kafka provides a simple and lightweight API for producers and consumers to establish communication with the Kafka cluster. While it requires more setup and configuration, it offers high performance and scalability. StreamSets, on the other hand, offers a visual development environment with drag-and-drop functionality for building data pipelines. It focuses on ease of use, allowing developers to quickly prototype and deploy data integration workflows without writing code.

  4. Data Transformation: Kafka does not provide out-of-the-box data transformation capabilities. It primarily focuses on data streaming and messaging. Data transformation in Kafka can be achieved using stream processing frameworks like Kafka Streams or external ETL/ELT tools. StreamSets, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive set of built-in processors for data transformation. It allows developers to apply complex transformations, filtering, enrichment, masking, and more, without the need for additional tools.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Kafka has a strong and active community with extensive documentation, support, and a wide range of third-party integrations. It is backed by Apache Software Foundation, which ensures its continuous development and improvement. StreamSets also has a growing community with active forums, tutorials, and community-driven extensions. It offers integrations with various tools and platforms like Apache Hadoop, Apache Spark, and Amazon Web Services.

  6. Scalability and Performance: Kafka is designed to handle high volumes of real-time streaming data with horizontal scalability. It can handle thousands of messages per second with low latency and high throughput. It provides fault-tolerant storage and replication to ensure data durability. StreamSets is also scalable and can handle large volumes of data, but its performance might be influenced by the complexity of transformations and the underlying infrastructure.

In summary, Kafka is a distributed streaming platform that focuses on high-throughput, fault-tolerant messaging and processing of real-time streaming data. StreamSets, on the other hand, is a data integration platform with a visual development environment that enables code-free data ingestion, transformation, and delivery. Both tools have their strengths and are used in different scenarios based on specific requirements and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Kafka, StreamSets

viradiya
viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSASP.NET CoreASP.NET CoreMSSQLMSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k
Comments
Ishfaq
Ishfaq

Feb 28, 2020

Needs advice

Our backend application is sending some external messages to a third party application at the end of each backend (CRUD) API call (from UI) and these external messages take too much extra time (message building, processing, then sent to the third party and log success/failure), UI application has no concern to these extra third party messages.

So currently we are sending these third party messages by creating a new child thread at end of each REST API call so UI application doesn't wait for these extra third party API calls.

I want to integrate Apache Kafka for these extra third party API calls, so I can also retry on failover third party API calls in a queue(currently third party messages are sending from multiple threads at the same time which uses too much processing and resources) and logging, etc.

Question 1: Is this a use case of a message broker?

Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better?

804k views804k
Comments
Roman
Roman

Senior Back-End Developer, Software Architect

Feb 12, 2019

ReviewonKafkaKafka

I use Kafka because it has almost infinite scaleability in terms of processing events (could be scaled to process hundreds of thousands of events), great monitoring (all sorts of metrics are exposed via JMX).

Downsides of using Kafka are:

  • you have to deal with Zookeeper
  • you have to implement advanced routing yourself (compared to RabbitMQ it has no advanced routing)
10.9k views10.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kafka
Kafka
StreamSets
StreamSets

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

An end-to-end data integration platform to build, run, monitor and manage smart data pipelines that deliver continuous data for DataOps.

Written at LinkedIn in Scala;Used by LinkedIn to offload processing of all page and other views;Defaults to using persistence, uses OS disk cache for hot data (has higher throughput then any of the above having persistence enabled);Supports both on-line as off-line processing
Only StreamSets provides a single design experience for all design patterns (batch, streaming, CDC, ETL, ELT, and ML pipelines) for 10x greater developer productivity; smart data pipelines that are resilient to change for 80% less breakages; and a single pane of glass for managing and monitoring all pipelines across hybrid and cloud architectures to eliminate blind spots and control gaps.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
14.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
24.2K
Stacks
53
Followers
22.3K
Followers
133
Votes
607
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
Cons
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging
Cons
  • 2
    No user community
  • 1
    Crashes
Integrations
No integrations available
HBase
HBase
Databricks
Databricks
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
MySQL
MySQL
gRPC
gRPC
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Cassandra
Cassandra
Hadoop
Hadoop
Redis
Redis

What are some alternatives to Kafka, StreamSets?

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase