Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jira

60.6K
47.9K
+ 1
1.2K
Testrail

196
259
+ 1
30
Add tool

Jira vs Testrail: What are the differences?

Introduction

Jira and Testrail are both widely used software tools in software development and testing. While they serve similar purposes in managing projects and tracking test cases, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Customization Flexibility: Jira offers a highly flexible and customizable platform, allowing users to adapt it to their specific workflow and needs. It provides a wide range of customization options, including custom fields, issue types, workflows, and screens. On the other hand, Testrail has a more standardized approach and offers fewer customization options compared to Jira.

  2. Issue Management vs. Test Management: Jira is primarily an issue and project management tool that can be used for software testing as well. It excels in managing tasks, bugs, and other issues throughout the software development lifecycle. Testrail, on the other hand, is designed specifically for test management. It offers functionalities like test case management, test planning, execution, and reporting.

  3. Integration Capabilities: Jira has strong integration capabilities and can easily integrate with various software tools commonly used in software development, such as CI/CD systems, source control systems, and collaboration platforms. Testrail, although it supports some integrations, does not have the same level of integration capabilities as Jira.

  4. User Interface and Ease of Use: Jira has a more complex and feature-rich user interface, which can be overwhelming for new users. However, it provides more functionalities and flexibility once users become familiar with the tool. In contrast, Testrail has a simpler and more user-friendly interface, making it easier for new users to get started quickly.

  5. Pricing and Licensing Model: Jira offers a range of pricing options, including perpetual licensing and subscription-based pricing. It also offers free options for small teams. Testrail, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based pricing model and does not offer a perpetual licensing option. The pricing of Testrail is generally higher than Jira for similar team sizes.

  6. Reporting and Metrics: Testrail provides comprehensive reporting functionalities and metrics specifically tailored for test management. It offers pre-built reports, charts, and statistics to track testing progress, coverage, and quality. Jira, while it also provides reporting capabilities, may require additional plugins or configurations to achieve similar test management-focused reporting.

In summary, Jira offers greater customization flexibility, broader functionality, and integration options, while Testrail focuses specifically on test management with an easier-to-use interface and comprehensive reporting capabilities. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and context of the project or organization.

Decisions about Jira and Testrail
Jakub Olan
Node.js Software Engineer · | 4 upvotes · 302.4K views

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Jira
Pros of Testrail
  • 310
    Powerful
  • 254
    Flexible
  • 149
    Easy separation of projects
  • 113
    Run in the cloud
  • 105
    Code integration
  • 57
    Easy to use
  • 52
    Run on your own
  • 39
    Great customization
  • 38
    Easy Workflow Configuration
  • 27
    REST API
  • 12
    Great Agile Management tool
  • 7
    Integrates with virtually everything
  • 6
    Confluence
  • 5
    Complicated
  • 3
    Sentry Issues Integration
  • 10
    Designed for testers
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 5
    Intutive
  • 5
    Easy Intergration
  • 3
    Customer Support
  • 1
    Integration to jira

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Jira
Cons of Testrail
  • 8
    Rather expensive
  • 5
    Large memory requirement
  • 2
    Slow
  • 1
    Cloud or Datacenter only
  • 4
    Pricey

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What companies use Jira?
What companies use Testrail?
See which teams inside your own company are using Jira or Testrail.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Jira?
What tools integrate with Testrail?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Jira and Testrail?
Trello
Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.
Asana
Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.
Confluence
Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
Redmine
Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.
Bugzilla
Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.
See all alternatives