StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Issue Tracking
  5. Jira vs SharePoint

Jira vs SharePoint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jira
Jira
Stacks62.5K
Followers49.5K
Votes1.2K
Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Stacks442
Followers314
Votes7

Jira vs SharePoint: What are the differences?

Jira is primarily used for project management and issue tracking and SharePoint focuses on collaboration and document management. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Integration with Project Management Tools: Jira is specifically designed for project management and provides extensive integration with various project management tools. It offers features like agile boards, scrum and kanban methodologies, and a wide range of project reports and analytics. On the other hand, SharePoint offers basic project management capabilities but lacks the comprehensive project management functionalities that Jira provides.

  2. Document Management and Collaboration: SharePoint is known for its strong document management and collaboration features. It allows users to create, store, and share documents, as well as collaborate in real-time. SharePoint provides version control, document approval workflows, and integration with Microsoft Office suite. Jira, on the other hand, focuses less on document management and collaboration, and more on issue tracking and project management.

  3. Customizability and Extensibility: Jira offers a high level of customizability and extensibility, allowing users to adapt the platform to their specific needs. It provides a robust set of APIs, plugins, and customization options, enabling users to create custom workflows, fields, and screens. SharePoint also offers customization options, but it is relatively more restrictive in terms of customization capabilities compared to Jira.

  4. Issue Tracking and Bug Management: Jira excels in issue tracking and bug management, providing a comprehensive set of features for managing and tracking issues throughout the project lifecycle. It offers customizable issue types, workflows, and allows users to prioritize, assign, and track issues efficiently. SharePoint offers basic issue tracking capabilities but lacks the advanced features and flexibility that Jira provides.

  5. Ease of Use and User Interface: SharePoint has a user-friendly interface and is widely recognized for its ease of use, especially for users familiar with Microsoft Office products. It provides a familiar user experience and integrates well with other Microsoft products. Jira, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve, especially for users who are new to project management and issue tracking tools. It offers a more specialized user interface and requires some training to fully utilize its capabilities.

  6. Cost and Licensing Model: Jira offers a flexible licensing model, providing different options to cater to the needs and budget of organizations. It offers both cloud-based and self-hosted options, allowing organizations to choose the deployment that suits them best. SharePoint, on the other hand, primarily follows a traditional licensing model and is often bundled with other Microsoft products. It may incur higher costs for organizations that require additional features or customization.

In summary, Jira is a powerful project management and issue tracking tool with extensive customization options, strong issue tracking capabilities, and integration with project management tools. SharePoint, on the other hand, focuses on document management, collaboration, and ease of use, with integration with Microsoft Office suite and a user-friendly interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jira, Microsoft SharePoint

Jakub
Jakub

Node.js Software Engineer at Araclx

Mar 6, 2020

DecidedonYouTrackYouTrackJiraJiraJetBrains SpaceJetBrains Space

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

329k views329k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira
Jira
Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.

Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use
Authentication; Business Intelligence; Web Content Management
Statistics
Stacks
62.5K
Stacks
442
Followers
49.5K
Followers
314
Votes
1.2K
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 310
    Powerful
  • 254
    Flexible
  • 149
    Easy separation of projects
  • 113
    Run in the cloud
  • 105
    Code integration
Cons
  • 8
    Rather expensive
  • 5
    Large memory requirement
  • 2
    Slow
  • 1
    Cloud or Datacenter only
Pros
  • 3
    Great online support
  • 1
    Stable Platform
  • 1
    Perfect version control
  • 1
    Seamless intergration with MS Office
  • 1
    Secure
Cons
  • 2
    Rigid, hard to add external applicaions
  • 1
    User interface. Steep learning curve, old-fashioned
Integrations
Acunote
Acunote
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
SnapEngage
SnapEngage
HipChat
HipChat
New Relic
New Relic
Zendesk
Zendesk
Zopim
Zopim
UserVoice
UserVoice
Balsamiq
Balsamiq
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to Jira, Microsoft SharePoint?

Google Drive

Google Drive

Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.

Dropbox

Dropbox

Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.

Box

Box

The Box API gives you access to the content management features you see in our web app and lets you extend them for use in your own app. It strives to be RESTful and is organized around the main resources you’re familiar with from the Box web interface.

HackPad

HackPad

Hackpad is a smart collaborative workspace that your team will love.

Quip

Quip

Edit and discuss in one place. Quip combines documents with messages so you can work faster, on the web or on the go.

Bugify

Bugify

Bugify offers a simple way of managing issues for your projects.

Nextcloud

Nextcloud

A suite of client-server software for creating and using file hosting services The most deployed self-hosted file share and collaboration platform on the web. Access & collaborate across your devices.

ceph

ceph

In computing,It is a free-software storage platform, implements object storage on a single distributed computer cluster, and provides interfaces for object-, block- and file-level storage.

ZenTao

ZenTao

You can effortlessly stay on top of your product development, create and delegate tasks, test your software, customize, store and secure your documents and more.

Bugzilla

Bugzilla

Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack