Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jenkins X vs OpenShift: What are the differences?
Introduction: In the world of software development, there are various tools and platforms available to streamline the process of Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD). Two popular options in this space are Jenkins X and OpenShift. While both serve the same purpose, there are key differences between them. Let's explore these differences in detail.
Architecture and Deployment Model: Jenkins X follows a cloud-native architecture and is primarily built for Kubernetes-based infrastructure. It integrates with various cloud providers and utilizes containerization technologies, such as Docker and Kubernetes. On the other hand, OpenShift is a comprehensive enterprise-grade container application platform that provides built-in CI/CD capabilities. It uses a combination of Docker containers, Kubernetes, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux to deliver a platform that supports the entire application lifecycle.
Ease of Use: Jenkins X promotes a GitOps workflow, where the entire CI/CD pipeline is defined and version-controlled in the Git repository. The platform strives to simplify the process of setting up and managing CI/CD pipelines by providing automated project scaffolding, pipeline configuration, and environment provisioning. OpenShift offers ease of use through its web-based interface, allowing developers to easily create and manage applications without getting involved in low-level infrastructure operations.
Native Kubernetes Integration: Jenkins X is specifically designed for Kubernetes and leverages its powerful native features. It automatically provisions and manages ephemeral environments for each pull request and provides preview environments for testing changes before merging. OpenShift also integrates with Kubernetes and provides additional enterprise-focused features on top of it, such as built-in monitoring, logging, and security capabilities.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Jenkins X has a vibrant and active community with continuous contributions to its open-source codebase. It benefits from the wide adoption of Jenkins and Kubernetes, which translates into excellent community support and extensive integration options with other tools and services. OpenShift, being an enterprise-grade platform developed by Red Hat, has a strong backing and a dedicated support network. It offers a comprehensive ecosystem with a wide range of integrated tools and services to streamline the development and deployment process.
Extensibility and Customization: Jenkins X provides an extensible plugin architecture that allows developers to customize and extend its capabilities. It supports a wide range of plugins and integrations with different tools, enabling developers to tailor the CI/CD workflow according to their project requirements. OpenShift also offers extensibility through its rich set of APIs, allowing developers to integrate with custom tools and configure advanced deployment strategies.
Pricing and Licensing: Jenkins X is an open-source project under the Apache License 2.0, which means it is free to use and modify. However, depending on the cloud provider and additional services used, there may be costs associated with infrastructure resources. OpenShift, being a commercial product offered by Red Hat, has licensing costs associated with it. The pricing model varies based on the edition and support package chosen, making it suitable for enterprises looking for comprehensive support and assurance.
In summary, Jenkins X is a cloud-native CI/CD platform specifically designed for Kubernetes-based infrastructure, offering extensibility and strong community support. OpenShift, on the other hand, is an enterprise-grade container application platform that provides built-in CI/CD capabilities and a comprehensive ecosystem. The choice between them depends on factors such as the infrastructure used, the level of enterprise features required, support needs, and licensing considerations.
We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.
Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.
We primarily need:
- Fast SBT builds (caching)
- Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
- Everything as code
- Ease of use
I think I've tried most of the CI tools out there at some point. It took me a while to get around to Buildkite because at first I didn't see much point given it seemed like you had to run the agent yourself. Eventually it dawned on me why this approach was more ingenious than I realised:
Running my app in a production (or production-like) environment was already a solved problem, because everything was already in some form of "everything as code". Having a test environment where the only difference was adding the Buildkite agent was a trivial addition.
It means that dev/test/prod parity is simple to achieve and maintain. It's also proven to be much easier to support than trying to deal with the problems that come with trying to force an app to fit into the nuances and constraints that are imposed by the containers/runtime of a CI service. When you completely control all of the environment the tests are running in you define those constraints too. It's been a great balance between a managed service and the flexibility of running it yourself.
And while none of my needs have hit the scale of Shopify (I saw one of their engineers speak about it at a conference once, I can't find the video now though 😞) it's good to know I can scale out my worker nodes to hundreds of thousands of workers to reduce the time it takes for my tests to run.
I would recommend you to consider the JFrog Platform that includes JFrog Pipelines - it will allow you to manage the full artifact life cycle for your sbt, docker and other technologies, and automate all of your CI and CD using cloud native declarative yaml pipelines. Will integrate smoothly with all your other toolset.
more configurable to setup ci/cd: * It can provide caching when build sbt, just add this section to yml file * Easy to use, many documentation
Weakness: * Need use gitlab as repository to bring more powerful configuration
Pros of Jenkins X
- Kubernetes integration7
- Scripted Pipelines5
- GitOps4
Pros of Red Hat OpenShift
- Good free plan99
- Open Source63
- Easy setup47
- Nodejs support43
- Well documented42
- Custom domains32
- Mongodb support28
- Clean and simple architecture27
- PHP support25
- Customizable environments21
- Ability to run CRON jobs11
- Easier than Heroku for a WordPress blog9
- Easy deployment8
- PostgreSQL support7
- Autoscaling7
- Good balance between Heroku and AWS for flexibility7
- Free, Easy Setup, Lot of Gear or D.I.Y Gear5
- Shell access to gears4
- Great Support3
- High Security3
- Logging & Metrics3
- Cloud Agnostic2
- Runs Anywhere - AWS, GCP, Azure2
- No credit card needed2
- Because it is easy to manage2
- Secure2
- Meteor support2
- Overly complicated and over engineered in majority of e2
- Golang support2
- Its free and offer custom domain usage2
- Autoscaling at a good price point1
- Easy setup and great customer support1
- MultiCloud1
- Great free plan with excellent support1
- This is the only free one among the three as of today1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Jenkins X
- Complexity1
Cons of Red Hat OpenShift
- Decisions are made for you, limiting your options2
- License cost2
- Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams1