Harness.io vs Jenkins

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Harness.io

Stacks58

Followers120

Votes6

Harness.io vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Harness.io and Jenkins, two popular DevOps tools. Harness.io is a continuous delivery platform that automates the entire CI/CD pipeline, while Jenkins is an open-source automation server that facilitates building, deploying, and automating projects.

Ease of Use: Harness.io provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to configure and manage their CI/CD pipeline. On the other hand, Jenkins has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical knowledge to set up and operate effectively.
Scalability: Harness.io is designed to be highly scalable, allowing users to easily scale their CI/CD infrastructure based on their needs. It provides features like autoscaling and on-demand capacity that can efficiently handle large-scale deployments. Jenkins, although flexible, may require additional manual configuration and setup to achieve the same level of scalability.
Native Cloud Support: Harness.io has built-in support for cloud platforms like AWS, GCP, and Azure. It seamlessly integrates with these platforms, providing users with native deployment capabilities and reducing the need for manual configuration. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires additional plugins and configurations to achieve similar native cloud integration.
Pipeline Orchestration: Harness.io offers a powerful pipeline orchestration feature that allows users to define complex workflows using a graphical user interface. It provides a drag-and-drop interface, making it easy to visualize and manage the various stages of the pipeline. Jenkins, although capable of pipeline management, requires users to define pipelines using code, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Built-in Monitoring and Rollback: Harness.io includes built-in monitoring capabilities that provide real-time visibility into the deployment process. It allows users to easily track metrics, set thresholds, and receive alerts for abnormal behavior. Moreover, Harness.io also offers automated rollback capabilities, which can automatically revert to a stable version in case of failures. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires additional plugins and setup to achieve similar monitoring and rollback functionalities.
Security and Compliance: Harness.io provides robust security features to ensure the integrity and safety of the CI/CD pipeline. It includes features like role-based access control, encryption, and compliance monitoring that help users meet their security and compliance requirements. Although Jenkins has some security features, it may require additional configuration and plugins to achieve similar levels of security and compliance.

In summary, Harness.io offers a user-friendly interface, native cloud support, scalable architecture, powerful pipeline orchestration, built-in monitoring and rollback, along with strong security and compliance features. Jenkins, while being a popular open-source tool, may require more technical expertise, manual configuration, and additional plugins to achieve similar capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Harness.io

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k

Comments

Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	Harness.io
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	ML-based Continuous Verification; Continuous Insights; Continuous Security; Advanced Deployment Strategies; Cloud & Container Cost Visibility; Cloud Cost Event Correlation; Detailed cost analysis without manual tagging
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 58
Followers 50.4K	Followers 120
Votes 2.2K	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support	Pros 1 Feature Flags 1 GitOps capability 1 HIO monitor application health and help resolve issues 1 Cloud Cost Management 1 Test Intelligence Cons 1 Cost grows quickly
Integrations
No integrations available	New Relic AWS CloudFormation Amazon CloudWatch Bugsnag Kubernetes Docker Sumo Logic Splunk Datadog Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Harness.io?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Harness.io vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

Ease of Use: Harness.io provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to configure and manage their CI/CD pipeline. On the other hand, Jenkins has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical knowledge to set up and operate effectively.
Scalability: Harness.io is designed to be highly scalable, allowing users to easily scale their CI/CD infrastructure based on their needs. It provides features like autoscaling and on-demand capacity that can efficiently handle large-scale deployments. Jenkins, although flexible, may require additional manual configuration and setup to achieve the same level of scalability.
Native Cloud Support: Harness.io has built-in support for cloud platforms like AWS, GCP, and Azure. It seamlessly integrates with these platforms, providing users with native deployment capabilities and reducing the need for manual configuration. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires additional plugins and configurations to achieve similar native cloud integration.
Pipeline Orchestration: Harness.io offers a powerful pipeline orchestration feature that allows users to define complex workflows using a graphical user interface. It provides a drag-and-drop interface, making it easy to visualize and manage the various stages of the pipeline. Jenkins, although capable of pipeline management, requires users to define pipelines using code, which can be more complex and time-consuming.
Built-in Monitoring and Rollback: Harness.io includes built-in monitoring capabilities that provide real-time visibility into the deployment process. It allows users to easily track metrics, set thresholds, and receive alerts for abnormal behavior. Moreover, Harness.io also offers automated rollback capabilities, which can automatically revert to a stable version in case of failures. Jenkins, on the other hand, requires additional plugins and setup to achieve similar monitoring and rollback functionalities.
Security and Compliance: Harness.io provides robust security features to ensure the integrity and safety of the CI/CD pipeline. It includes features like role-based access control, encryption, and compliance monitoring that help users meet their security and compliance requirements. Although Jenkins has some security features, it may require additional configuration and plugins to achieve similar levels of security and compliance.

Harness.io vs Jenkins

Overview

Harness.io vs Jenkins: What are the differences?