StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Google App Engine vs Microsoft IIS

Google App Engine vs Microsoft IIS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Stacks10.5K
Followers8.1K
Votes611
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236

Google App Engine vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?

Introduction

Google App Engine and Microsoft IIS are both popular platforms used for web application development and hosting. However, they have some key differences that set them apart. In this markdown, I will outline six specific differences between Google App Engine and Microsoft IIS.

  1. Scalability and Flexible Pricing: Google App Engine offers automatic scaling, allowing applications to handle large traffic without manual intervention. The pricing is based on resource consumption, providing flexibility to pay only for what is used. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS requires manual configuration for scaling and pricing is determined by the number of server instances or licenses used.

  2. Programming Language Support: Google App Engine supports multiple programming languages including Python, Java, Go, and Node.js, offering developers a wider choice. In contrast, Microsoft IIS primarily supports .NET languages such as C# and VB.NET, limiting language options for developers.

  3. Managed Infrastructure vs. Self-hosting: Google App Engine provides a fully managed infrastructure, taking care of server management, patching, and updates. This allows developers to focus solely on application development. In contrast, Microsoft IIS requires the user to manage and maintain the server infrastructure themselves.

  4. Automatic Deployment and Continuous Integration: Google App Engine provides seamless integration with Google Cloud Build for automatic deployment and continuous integration. This streamlines the development process and ensures efficient testing and deployment. Microsoft IIS requires manual deployment and lacks built-in support for continuous integration, necessitating additional configuration.

  5. Storage Options and Database Support: Google App Engine offers various storage options, including Google Cloud Storage, Cloud Datastore, and Cloud SQL. It supports multiple databases like MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and others. In contrast, Microsoft IIS primarily relies on Microsoft SQL Server as the default database and has limited storage options compared to Google App Engine.

  6. Server Environment: Google App Engine runs on a distributed infrastructure, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. It automatically handles load balancing and scaling across multiple servers. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS runs on a single server or a cluster of servers, requiring manual setup and configuration for load balancing and fault tolerance.

In summary, Google App Engine distinguishes itself from Microsoft IIS through its automatic scaling, wider language support, managed infrastructure, automatic deployment, diverse storage options, and distributed server environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google App Engine, Microsoft IIS

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.
-
Statistics
Stacks
10.5K
Stacks
15.5K
Followers
8.1K
Followers
7.7K
Votes
611
Votes
236
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 145
    Easy to deploy
  • 106
    Auto scaling
  • 80
    Good free plan
  • 62
    Easy management
  • 56
    Scalability
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Twilio
Twilio
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, Microsoft IIS?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase