Glitch vs Google App Engine

Overview

Google App Engine

Stacks10.5K

Followers8.1K

Votes611

Glitch

Stacks87

Followers179

Votes42

Glitch vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction: In comparing Glitch and Google App Engine, it's essential to note the key differences between these two platforms.

Deployment Method: Glitch allows for quick and easy deployment with real-time editing, providing users with instant feedback on their changes. On the other hand, Google App Engine requires a more structured deployment process, involving the creation of configuration files and a specific deployment command.
Cost Structure: Glitch offers a free tier with limitations on project size and resources, while Google App Engine provides a flexible pricing model based on resources consumed, such as storage, bandwidth, and compute instances. This allows users to scale their applications more efficiently based on their needs and budget.
Language Support: Glitch primarily supports JavaScript and web technologies, allowing users to build web applications using popular frameworks. In contrast, Google App Engine offers support for various programming languages like Python, Java, Go, and PHP, providing more flexibility for developers with different language preferences.
Scalability: Google App Engine is designed for high scalability and can automatically adjust resources based on traffic demands, making it suitable for large-scale applications. In comparison, while Glitch does provide some scaling capabilities, it may not be as robust or efficient for handling sudden spikes in traffic as Google App Engine.
Data Storage: Google App Engine integrates seamlessly with Google Cloud Datastore and Google Cloud SQL for database management, ensuring efficient data storage and retrieval. In contrast, Glitch provides basic in-app storage options but may not offer the same level of reliability and scalability as Google's cloud-based storage solutions.
Custom Domain Support: Google App Engine allows users to easily connect custom domains to their applications, providing a more professional and branded user experience. In contrast, Glitch may have limitations or require additional configurations for setting up custom domains, potentially affecting the overall branding and accessibility of the application.

In Summary, Glitch and Google App Engine differ in deployment method, cost structure, language support, scalability, data storage options, and custom domain support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google App Engine	Glitch
Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.	Combining automated deployment, instant hosting and collaborative editing, Gomix gets you straight to coding. The apps you create are instantly live, hosted by us, and always up to date with your latest changes. Build products, prototype ideas, and hack solutions to problems.
Zero to sixty: Scale your app automatically without worrying about managing machines.;Supercharged APIs: Supercharge your app with services such as Task Queue, XMPP, and Cloud SQL, all powered by the same infrastructure that powers the Google services you use every day.;You're in control: Manage your application with a simple, web-based dashboard allowing you to customize your app's performance.	Show off your work with the web—effortlessly; Share code and solutions for anyone
Statistics
Stacks 10.5K	Stacks 87
Followers 8.1K	Followers 179
Votes 611	Votes 42
Pros & Cons
Pros 145 Easy to deploy 106 Auto scaling 80 Good free plan 62 Easy management 56 Scalability	Pros 12 Bang! App built 9 Instant APPification ;) 7 Auto commits 4 No no. limitation on free projects 3 Easy to use Cons 5 UI could be better / cleaner 2 Limited Support/Diffficult to use Non-JS Languages 1 Automatically suspends proxies 1 Cannot delete project, only the source code is 1 Not good for big projects
Integrations
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces Twilio Twilio SendGrid	DigitalOcean App Platform Fastly SQLite React

What are some alternatives to Google App Engine, Glitch?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Glitch vs Google App Engine: What are the differences?

Introduction: In comparing Glitch and Google App Engine, it's essential to note the key differences between these two platforms.

Deployment Method: Glitch allows for quick and easy deployment with real-time editing, providing users with instant feedback on their changes. On the other hand, Google App Engine requires a more structured deployment process, involving the creation of configuration files and a specific deployment command.
Cost Structure: Glitch offers a free tier with limitations on project size and resources, while Google App Engine provides a flexible pricing model based on resources consumed, such as storage, bandwidth, and compute instances. This allows users to scale their applications more efficiently based on their needs and budget.
Language Support: Glitch primarily supports JavaScript and web technologies, allowing users to build web applications using popular frameworks. In contrast, Google App Engine offers support for various programming languages like Python, Java, Go, and PHP, providing more flexibility for developers with different language preferences.
Scalability: Google App Engine is designed for high scalability and can automatically adjust resources based on traffic demands, making it suitable for large-scale applications. In comparison, while Glitch does provide some scaling capabilities, it may not be as robust or efficient for handling sudden spikes in traffic as Google App Engine.
Data Storage: Google App Engine integrates seamlessly with Google Cloud Datastore and Google Cloud SQL for database management, ensuring efficient data storage and retrieval. In contrast, Glitch provides basic in-app storage options but may not offer the same level of reliability and scalability as Google's cloud-based storage solutions.
Custom Domain Support: Google App Engine allows users to easily connect custom domains to their applications, providing a more professional and branded user experience. In contrast, Glitch may have limitations or require additional configurations for setting up custom domains, potentially affecting the overall branding and accessibility of the application.

In Summary, Glitch and Google App Engine differ in deployment method, cost structure, language support, scalability, data storage options, and custom domain support.