Flinto vs Framer

Overview

Framer

Stacks365

Followers502

Votes32

GitHub Stars5.9K

Forks477

Flinto

Stacks39

Followers44

Votes0

Flinto vs Framer: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of user interface design tools, both Flinto and Framer are popular choices among designers and developers. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart in terms of features and functionalities.

Visual Prototyping: Flinto focuses on providing a user-friendly visual prototyping experience, aiming to simplify the process of creating interactive prototypes without the need for extensive coding knowledge. On the other hand, Framer offers more advanced customization options, allowing users to create intricate animations and interactions using code, making it a powerful tool for those with coding skills.
Collaboration Tools: Flinto offers collaborative features such as cloud syncing, team sharing, and feedback gathering, making it a suitable choice for team-based projects. In contrast, Framer puts more emphasis on individual customization and may lack some of the collaboration features found in Flinto.
Learning Curve: Flinto is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it easier for beginners to pick up and start creating prototypes quickly. Framer, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its coding-based approach, requiring users to have a basic understanding of programming concepts.
Compatibility: Flinto is primarily focused on designing prototypes for mobile apps and websites, offering a range of pre-built templates and design elements tailored for these platforms. In comparison, Framer is more versatile and can be used to create prototypes for various devices and interfaces, providing greater flexibility in design exploration.
Interaction Design: Framer provides more advanced tools for creating complex interactions and animations, giving designers more control over how elements behave in response to user input. Flinto, while offering basic interaction capabilities, may not be as robust in handling intricate interactions and animations compared to Framer.

In Summary, Flinto and Framer offer distinct advantages based on their respective strengths in visual prototyping, collaboration tools, learning curve, compatibility, and interaction design, catering to different preferences and skill levels in the design and development community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Framer	Flinto
Framer is a JavaScript framework that makes creating realistic prototypes a breeze – complete with filters, spring physics and full 3D effects. Framer Generator is a desktop app that imports the resources and folder hierarchy from Photoshop files (Sketch coming soon). Import your design and immediately start to add interaction and animation.	It is a Mac app used by designers around the world to create interactive and animated prototypes of their app designs. It lets designers quickly make interactive prototypes of their mobile, desktop, or web apps.
Generate assets out of Photoshop to set up new projects.;Animate any layer in 3D space with spring physics and bezier curves.;Hardware accelerated for high frame rates, based on CSS transforms.;Works on desktop, mobile and tablets. Plays well with WebKit.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 477	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 365	Stacks 39
Followers 502	Followers 44
Votes 32	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 18 Great for prototyping 6 Free 5 Fast idea validation 3 Integrates right with Photoshop	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Figma Android OS macOS Sketch iOS	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Framer, Flinto?

ProtoPie

It is the easiest tool used to turn your UI/UX design ideas into highly interactive prototypes for mobile, desktop, web, all the way to IoT. ProtoPie runs on macOS & Windows and the player app is on iOS and Android.

Origami

Origami is a free toolkit for Quartz Composer—created by the Facebook Design team—that makes interactive design prototyping easy and doesn’t require programming.

Supernova

Supernova converts any mobile design to full-fledged native applications, giving the developers extra time to do actual coding. No need to export resources, write navigation, connect it to components created by hand, read styles, apply styles, copy-paste information..

Lottie

Lottie is a mobile library for Android and iOS that parses Adobe After Effects animations exported as json with Bodymovin and renders them natively on mobile!

Material

Express your creativity with Material, an animation and graphics framework for Google's Material Design and Apple's Flat UI in Swift.

Principle

It makes it easy to design animated and interactive user interfaces. Whether you're designing the flow of a multi-screen app, or new interactions and animations, it helps you create designs that look and feel amazing.

Fuse

It is a set of user experience development tools that unify design, prototyping and implementation of high quality, native apps for iOS and Android.

Fiber

Fiber UI Kit is the perfect starting place for your next project. Each element has been designed to work independently or as one seamless flow. It’s a full-fledged prototype with customizable components.

Pop

Pop is an extensible animation engine for iOS and OS X. In addition to basic static animations, it supports spring and decay dynamic animations, making it useful for building realistic, physics-based interactions. The API allows quick integration with existing Objective-C codebases and enables the animation of any property on any object. It's a mature and well-tested framework that drives all the animations and transitions in Paper.

Avocado

Avocado is an open source interaction design toolbox built by IDEO. It enables designers to make quick interactive prototypes without writing a line of code. Built on top of Facebook's Origami framework, Avocado provides ready-to-use patches that can be easily combined to create fully-customized prototypes. Official announcement: http://labs.ideo.com/2014/05/27/avocado/

Related Comparisons

Flinto vs Framer: What are the differences?

Introduction

Visual Prototyping: Flinto focuses on providing a user-friendly visual prototyping experience, aiming to simplify the process of creating interactive prototypes without the need for extensive coding knowledge. On the other hand, Framer offers more advanced customization options, allowing users to create intricate animations and interactions using code, making it a powerful tool for those with coding skills.
Collaboration Tools: Flinto offers collaborative features such as cloud syncing, team sharing, and feedback gathering, making it a suitable choice for team-based projects. In contrast, Framer puts more emphasis on individual customization and may lack some of the collaboration features found in Flinto.
Learning Curve: Flinto is known for its user-friendly interface and intuitive design, making it easier for beginners to pick up and start creating prototypes quickly. Framer, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its coding-based approach, requiring users to have a basic understanding of programming concepts.
Compatibility: Flinto is primarily focused on designing prototypes for mobile apps and websites, offering a range of pre-built templates and design elements tailored for these platforms. In comparison, Framer is more versatile and can be used to create prototypes for various devices and interfaces, providing greater flexibility in design exploration.
Interaction Design: Framer provides more advanced tools for creating complex interactions and animations, giving designers more control over how elements behave in response to user input. Flinto, while offering basic interaction capabilities, may not be as robust in handling intricate interactions and animations compared to Framer.

Flinto vs Framer

Overview

Flinto vs Framer: What are the differences?