FireHost vs WebFaction: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **Data Center Security**: FireHost utilizes physical security measures like biometric access controls and continuous surveillance cameras, while WebFaction relies more on software-based security mechanisms such as firewall rules and intrusion detection systems.
2. **Scalability**: FireHost offers vertical scalability by allowing clients to easily upgrade their resources and capacity, whereas WebFaction's scalability options are more limited and may require migrating to a different plan.
3. **Managed Services**: FireHost provides fully managed services, including server monitoring and maintenance, while WebFaction offers a more self-managed approach where clients are responsible for the majority of server administration tasks.
4. **Compliance Certifications**: FireHost has various compliance certifications such as PCI DSS and HIPAA, making it suitable for industries with strict security and regulatory requirements, while WebFaction may not have as many specialized certifications.
5. **Support Services**: FireHost offers 24/7 support with a team of experts available to assist clients, whereas WebFaction has more limited support hours and may not have the same level of expertise readily available.
6. **Control Panel**: WebFaction provides a custom-built control panel for managing websites and server settings, while FireHost uses industry-standard control panels such as cPanel or Plesk for server management tasks.

In Summary, FireHost offers enhanced security measures, managed services, and compliance certifications, along with better scalability and support options compared to WebFaction.