Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Firebase

39.9K
34.3K
+ 1
2K
MoEngage

33
49
+ 1
0
Add tool

Firebase vs MoEngage: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Firebase and MoEngage

Firebase and MoEngage are both popular technology platforms used for various purposes in web and mobile app development. However, there are several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Purpose: Firebase is a comprehensive platform that offers a wide range of services including hosting, real-time database, authentication, cloud messaging, and more. It is designed as a backend as a service (BaaS) that provides a complete set of backend features for app development. On the other hand, MoEngage is primarily a customer engagement platform that focuses on personalized marketing automation, user analytics, and user engagement.

  2. Integration: Firebase can be easily integrated with various Google services and APIs, making it seamless to use with other Google tools. It also offers deep integrations with popular frameworks like Angular, React, and Flutter. MoEngage, on the other hand, can integrate with various third-party tools and platforms like Salesforce, Adobe Analytics, and Google Analytics. It provides extensive support for integration with marketing automation and analytics tools.

  3. User Analytics: Firebase includes Google Analytics, which provides detailed insights into user behavior, demographics, and app performance. It offers features like event tracking, user segmentation, and funnel analysis. MoEngage, on the other hand, provides advanced user analytics specifically focused on user engagement and marketing campaigns. It includes features like cohort analysis, RFM analysis (recency, frequency, monetary value), and predictive analytics for marketing automation.

  4. Personalization and Campaigns: MoEngage excels in offering personalized marketing campaigns and user engagement features. It provides capabilities like dynamic segmentation, A/B testing, and push notifications with advanced personalization options. Firebase, on the other hand, offers basic push notification capabilities but does not provide robust personalization features for marketing campaigns.

  5. Real-time Updates: Firebase includes a real-time database feature that allows real-time synchronization of data between clients and servers. This allows for instant updates and collaboration in applications. MoEngage, on the other hand, does not provide a real-time database feature and focuses more on user engagement and marketing automation rather than real-time collaborative features.

  6. Pricing Model: Firebase offers a flexible pricing model with a generous free tier and pay-as-you-go pricing for additional usage. MoEngage, on the other hand, offers pricing based on the number of monthly active users (MAUs) and the features required. It offers different pricing plans based on the scale of usage and additional add-on features.

In summary, Firebase provides a comprehensive backend as a service platform with a wide range of features, while MoEngage focuses on customer engagement and personalized marketing automation. They differ in their purpose, integration options, user analytics, personalization capabilities, real-time updates, and pricing models.

Advice on Firebase and MoEngage
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 461.2K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Firebase
Pros of MoEngage
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
  • 134
    Free
  • 128
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 68
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 32
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 18
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Chat
  • 6
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 6
    Firebase hosting
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    .net
  • 2
    Cloud functions
  • 2
    Free hosting
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Google's support
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Simple and easy
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Serverless
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Firebase
    Cons of MoEngage
    • 31
      Can become expensive
    • 16
      No open source, you depend on external company
    • 15
      Scalability is not infinite
    • 9
      Not Flexible Enough
    • 7
      Cant filter queries
    • 3
      Very unstable server
    • 3
      No Relational Data
    • 2
      Too many errors
    • 2
      No offline sync
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Firebase?

      Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

      What is MoEngage?

      It is a Mobile App Engagement & Marketing Platform, which helps Companies understand their Mobile App users better and reach out with relevant content at the right time using the right medium. You can think of us like MailChimp for mobile apps.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Firebase?
      What companies use MoEngage?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Firebase or MoEngage.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Firebase?
      What tools integrate with MoEngage?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      GitNode.jsFirebase+5
      7
      2343
      What are some alternatives to Firebase and MoEngage?
      Parse
      With Parse, you can add a scalable and powerful backend in minutes and launch a full-featured app in record time without ever worrying about server management. We offer push notifications, social integration, data storage, and the ability to add rich custom logic to your app’s backend with Cloud Code.
      MongoDB
      MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
      Heroku
      Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
      Auth0
      A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.
      Realm
      The Realm Mobile Platform is a next-generation data layer for applications. Realm is reactive, concurrent, and lightweight, allowing you to work with live, native objects.
      See all alternatives