StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Empire vs Hasura vs MongoDB Stitch

Empire vs Hasura vs MongoDB Stitch

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Empire
Empire
Stacks7
Followers28
Votes4
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks156
Hasura
Hasura
Stacks343
Followers634
Votes144
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.8K
MongoDB Stitch
MongoDB Stitch
Stacks133
Followers231
Votes4

Empire vs Hasura vs MongoDB Stitch: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here we will discuss the key differences between Empire and Hasura and MongoDB Stitch in terms of their features, functionality, and use cases.

  1. Deployment and Scalability: One key difference between Empire and Hasura is their approach to deployment and scalability. Empire is designed to be deployed as a standalone service, allowing for more flexibility in deployment options and scalability. Hasura, on the other hand, is primarily focused on being deployed with Kubernetes, which provides a more streamlined and automated deployment process. MongoDB Stitch also allows for easy deployment and scalability, with built-in horizontal scaling capabilities.

  2. Data Storage: Another major difference between Empire and Hasura and MongoDB Stitch is their data storage capabilities. Empire primarily utilizes PostgreSQL as its underlying database, providing robust and mature data storage options. Hasura, on the other hand, can work with various databases, including PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQL Server, providing more flexibility in terms of database choices. MongoDB Stitch, as the name suggests, is built on top of MongoDB, offering a NoSQL document-based data storage approach.

  3. Real-time Updates: Hasura and MongoDB Stitch offer more comprehensive real-time update capabilities compared to Empire. Hasura utilizes GraphQL subscriptions and event triggers to provide real-time updates to clients, while MongoDB Stitch leverages MongoDB's change streams feature. Empire, on the other hand, relies on traditional query-based approaches for data retrieval and updates.

  4. Authentication and Authorization: Empire, Hasura, and MongoDB Stitch all provide authentication and authorization features. However, there are differences in terms of their implementation and supported authentication providers. Empire offers a pluggable authentication system, allowing for customization and integration with various authentication providers. Hasura also provides various authentication options, including JWT, auth0, and custom methods. MongoDB Stitch offers authentication through various providers such as email/password, Google, Facebook, and more.

  5. Serverless Functions: Both Hasura and MongoDB Stitch offer serverless function capabilities, allowing users to execute custom code on the server-side. Hasura uses webhooks and Actions to enable serverless functions, while MongoDB Stitch provides a serverless functions feature called "Stitch Functions." Empire, on the other hand, does not have built-in serverless function capabilities.

  6. Pricing: Pricing is another important difference between Empire, Hasura, and MongoDB Stitch. Empire and Hasura are open-source solutions that can be self-hosted, making them free to use. MongoDB Stitch, on the other hand, is a fully managed service provided by MongoDB, which means there are pricing considerations based on usage and the selected plan.

In summary, Empire, Hasura, and MongoDB Stitch differ in terms of their deployment and scalability options, supported databases, real-time update capabilities, authentication and authorization mechanisms, serverless function features, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Empire, Hasura, MongoDB Stitch

Márton
Márton

CTO at Media4Care

Aug 31, 2020

Decided

We wanted to save as much time as possible when writing our back-end, therefore Apollo was out of the question, we went for an auto-generated API instead. Hasura looked good in the beginning, but we wanted to retain the ability to add a few manual resolvers and modifications to auto-generated ones, which ruled out Hasura. Postgraphile with its Plug-In architecture was the right choice for us, we never regretted it!

37.1k views37.1k
Comments
Raj
Raj

CTO & Founder at Novvum

Oct 5, 2020

Review

Hey Brian, it's hard to pick a best tool for any situation, however, there are tools that offer advantages dependent on use case.

Server Side

If you're looking to quickly generate a GraphQL API, you can use a Graphql As A Service like FaunaDB, Slash Graphql, or 8base.

If you want something more advanced on the server side: Prisma with Postgres, Nexus, & Apollo Server (js) is a great stack to try out. Examples here

Check out TypeORM and TypeGraphQL too

If you're have some existing data on Postgres, PostGraphile or Hasura are your best bet!

If you are using a lot of AWS services, check out Amplify and AppSync. Tutorial here

On the client side:

Check out Gatsby! Graphql is already configured and used to query static or remote information at build time. It's a great way to get your feet wet!

Apollo Client is often the choice for more advanced use cases. But URLQL and gqless are some pretty good alternatives too!

Hope this helps! 👍

304 views304
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Empire
Empire
Hasura
Hasura
MongoDB Stitch
MongoDB Stitch

Empire is a control layer on top of Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) that provides a Heroku like workflow. It conforms to a subset of the Heroku Platform API, which means you can use the same tools and processes that you use with Heroku, but with all the power of EC2 and Docker.

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

MongoDB Stitch lets developers focus on building applications rather than on managing data manipulation code, service integration, or backend infrastructure. Stitch lets you focus on building the app users want, not on writing boilerplate backend logic.

-
Stack-agnostic; Cloud-agnostic; Git push to deploy; Pre-configured API Gateway; Instant GraphQL or JSON APIs; Out-of-the-box Auth APIs with UI Kits; Filestore APIs with access control; Deploy custom code
REST API to MongoDB Atlas;Declarative data access controls;Service integrations (AWS S3, Twilio...);WebHooks;REST-like API for JavaScript, Android and iOS clients
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
156
GitHub Forks
2.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
7
Stacks
343
Stacks
133
Followers
28
Followers
634
Followers
231
Votes
4
Votes
144
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Easy deployment
  • 1
    BSD License
  • 1
    Open source
  • 1
    12-factor methodology
Pros
  • 23
    Fast
  • 18
    Easy GraphQL subscriptions
  • 16
    Easy setup of relationships and permissions
  • 15
    Automatically generates your GraphQL schema
  • 15
    Minimal learning curve
Cons
  • 3
    Cumbersome validations
Pros
  • 2
    Static Hosting
  • 1
    Best integration with MongoDB (Atlas)
  • 1
    Serverless
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Docker
Docker
GraphQL
GraphQL
GitHub
GitHub
MongoDB Atlas
MongoDB Atlas
Twilio
Twilio
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Mailgun
Mailgun
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Slack
Slack
Amazon SES
Amazon SES
PubNub
PubNub
Google Cloud Messaging
Google Cloud Messaging

What are some alternatives to Empire, Hasura, MongoDB Stitch?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase