Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
DeepSource Analyzer vs Snyk: What are the differences?
DeepSource Analyzer vs Snyk
DeepSource Analyzer and Snyk are both powerful tools used for analyzing code and detecting vulnerabilities in software projects. However, there are several key differences between the two.
Integration Process: DeepSource Analyzer seamlessly integrates with various version control systems, such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, making it easier for developers to incorporate it into their existing workflow. On the other hand, Snyk requires additional setup and configuration to integrate with these platforms.
Supported Languages: DeepSource Analyzer supports a wide range of programming languages, including Python, JavaScript, Go, and Ruby, among others. In contrast, while Snyk also supports popular languages like JavaScript, Python, and Ruby, it has limited support for other languages like Go.
Extensibility: DeepSource Analyzer allows users to write custom analyzers and linters using a simple plugin architecture, enabling them to tailor the tool to their specific requirements. In contrast, Snyk does not provide such extensibility options, limiting users to the built-in capabilities of the tool.
Continuous Integration: DeepSource Analyzer provides built-in support for continuous integration systems like Travis CI, CircleCI, and Jenkins, enabling seamless integration into the CI/CD pipeline. Snyk, on the other hand, requires additional configuration to integrate with these systems, which may be cumbersome for some users.
Code Review: DeepSource Analyzer offers powerful code review features that help developers identify and fix issues early in the development process. It provides detailed reports, suggestions, and automated fixes, enabling quicker resolution of code quality and security issues. Snyk, while offering code scanning capabilities, does not provide the same level of code review and automated fixes.
Pricing and Plans: DeepSource Analyzer offers a free plan for open-source projects, making it accessible to developers who work on such projects. Snyk, on the other hand, offers a free plan for individual developers, but charges for additional features and team collaboration.
In summary, DeepSource Analyzer and Snyk differ in terms of integration process, language support, extensibility, continuous integration, code review capabilities, and pricing plans. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and development environments.
I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.
I'd recommend Snyk since it provides an IDE extension for Developers, SAST, auto PR security fixes, container, IaC and includes open source scanning as well. I like their scoring method as well for better prioritization. I was able to remove most of the containers and cli tools I had in my pipelines since Snyk covers secrets, vulns, security and some code cleaning. SAST has false positives but the scoring helps. Also had to spend time putting some training docs but their engineers helped out with content.
Pros of DeepSource
- Free for open source3
- Easy setup and analysis3
- Autofixes for many lints for free2
Pros of Snyk
- Github Integration10
- Free for open source projects5
- Finds lots of real vulnerabilities4
- Easy to deployed1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of DeepSource
- Test coverage % differs from actual1
Cons of Snyk
- Does not integrated with SonarQube2
- No malware detection1
- No surface monitoring1
- Complex UI1
- False positives1