Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

DeepSource

16
49
+ 1
8
Snyk

478
379
+ 1
20
Add tool

DeepSource Analyzer vs Snyk: What are the differences?

DeepSource Analyzer vs Snyk

DeepSource Analyzer and Snyk are both powerful tools used for analyzing code and detecting vulnerabilities in software projects. However, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Integration Process: DeepSource Analyzer seamlessly integrates with various version control systems, such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, making it easier for developers to incorporate it into their existing workflow. On the other hand, Snyk requires additional setup and configuration to integrate with these platforms.

  2. Supported Languages: DeepSource Analyzer supports a wide range of programming languages, including Python, JavaScript, Go, and Ruby, among others. In contrast, while Snyk also supports popular languages like JavaScript, Python, and Ruby, it has limited support for other languages like Go.

  3. Extensibility: DeepSource Analyzer allows users to write custom analyzers and linters using a simple plugin architecture, enabling them to tailor the tool to their specific requirements. In contrast, Snyk does not provide such extensibility options, limiting users to the built-in capabilities of the tool.

  4. Continuous Integration: DeepSource Analyzer provides built-in support for continuous integration systems like Travis CI, CircleCI, and Jenkins, enabling seamless integration into the CI/CD pipeline. Snyk, on the other hand, requires additional configuration to integrate with these systems, which may be cumbersome for some users.

  5. Code Review: DeepSource Analyzer offers powerful code review features that help developers identify and fix issues early in the development process. It provides detailed reports, suggestions, and automated fixes, enabling quicker resolution of code quality and security issues. Snyk, while offering code scanning capabilities, does not provide the same level of code review and automated fixes.

  6. Pricing and Plans: DeepSource Analyzer offers a free plan for open-source projects, making it accessible to developers who work on such projects. Snyk, on the other hand, offers a free plan for individual developers, but charges for additional features and team collaboration.

In summary, DeepSource Analyzer and Snyk differ in terms of integration process, language support, extensibility, continuous integration, code review capabilities, and pricing plans. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and development environments.

Advice on DeepSource and Snyk
Bryan Dady
SRE Manager at Subsplash · | 5 upvotes · 459.8K views

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

See more
Replies (1)
Moises Figueroa
DevOps Engineer at Ingenium Code · | 2 upvotes · 40K views
Recommends

I'd recommend Snyk since it provides an IDE extension for Developers, SAST, auto PR security fixes, container, IaC and includes open source scanning as well. I like their scoring method as well for better prioritization. I was able to remove most of the containers and cli tools I had in my pipelines since Snyk covers secrets, vulns, security and some code cleaning. SAST has false positives but the scoring helps. Also had to spend time putting some training docs but their engineers helped out with content.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of DeepSource
Pros of Snyk
  • 3
    Free for open source
  • 3
    Easy setup and analysis
  • 2
    Autofixes for many lints for free
  • 10
    Github Integration
  • 5
    Free for open source projects
  • 4
    Finds lots of real vulnerabilities
  • 1
    Easy to deployed

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of DeepSource
Cons of Snyk
  • 1
    Test coverage % differs from actual
  • 2
    Does not integrated with SonarQube
  • 1
    No malware detection
  • 1
    No surface monitoring
  • 1
    Complex UI
  • 1
    False positives

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is DeepSource?

DeepSource helps developers ship clean and secure code with powerful static analysis, OWASP Top 10 reporting, and Autofix. Trusted by thousands of startups, enterprises, and Fortune 500 companies.

What is Snyk?

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use DeepSource?
What companies use Snyk?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with DeepSource?
What tools integrate with Snyk?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to DeepSource and Snyk?
Git
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
GitHub
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
Visual Studio Code
Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.
Docker
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
npm
npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.
See all alternatives